Virtual Reality Software for Patients With Stroke (RESET)

November 25, 2024 updated by: Alberto Soriano-Maldonado, Universidad de Almeria

Development and Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Software for Improving Disability and Quality of Life in Patients With Stroke

The goal os this clinical trial is to develop and validate a gamified, fully immersive, and stroke-specific virtual reality software to improve physical disability and quality of life in patients with stroke.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • To assess the effects of a gamified, fully immersive and stroke-specific virtual reality 10-week intervention combined with usual care rehabilitation, compared to usual care rehabilitation alone and in combination with a commercially available VR system, on disability in patients with stroke.
  • To assess the effects of a gamified, fully immersive and stroke-specific virtual reality intervention combined with usual care rehabilitation, compared to usual care rehabilitation alone and in combination with a commercially available virtual reality system, on quality of life, upper-body motor function, gross manual dexterity, handgrip strength, static and dynamic balance, and cognitive function in patients with stroke

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability and ranks as the second most prevalent cause of mortality worldwide. According to data from the World Health Organization, since 2005, the global probability of a person experiencing a stroke has increased by 50 percent. It is expected that 1 in 4 individuals will face the risk of having a stroke in their lifetime. A stroke can result in significant loss of motor functions, communications abilities, weakness, or hemiparesis, leading to a diminished quality of life. Therefore, improving the rehabilitation process is evidently of paramount significance. Virtual reality has emerged as a novel strategy to improve neurological diseases; however, there is an absence of an immersive software designed specifically for stroke patients within a gamified environment. Therefore, the aim of RESET randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effect of a gamified, fully immersive, and stroke-specific virtual reality software on disability in stroke patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Alberto Soriano-Maldonado, PhD
  • Phone Number: 950 01 55 50
  • Email: asoriano@ual.es

Study Locations

      • Almeria, Spain, 04009
        • Recruiting
        • Torrecárdenas University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Granada, Spain, 18071
        • Recruiting
        • University of Granada
        • Contact:
      • Granada, Spain, 18016
        • Recruiting
        • San Cecilio University Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Almería
      • Almeria, Almería, Spain, 04120
        • Recruiting
        • University of Almeria
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women and men with either an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • Stroke between the last 7 to 14 days
  • Functional independence before stroke (modified Rankin scale <3)
  • Paresis of the lower extremity, upper extremity, or both, with a score ≤3 on the "motor arm" item of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scale
  • Trunk control in seated and standing position
  • Ability to understand basic instructions and to decide whether to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate-severe aphasia that precludes understanding the required tasks
  • Cognitive impairment that precludes cooperation with tasks
  • Serious behavioral problems or mental disorders
  • Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, quadriplegia, neurodegenerative diseases, lower limb fractures, or recent myocardial infarction
  • Vital organ (heart, lung, liver, kidney, etc.) failure, malignant tumor, or other unstable condition
  • A history of cerebrovascular disease (if not fully resolved)
  • Photosensitive epilepsy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Commercial non-immersive virtual reality group (CVR)
Nintendo Switch (Nintendo Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan).
This group will use the Nintendo Switch (Nintendo Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan) gaming system with the Sports package games.
Experimental: Gamified, fully immersive and stroke-specific virtual reality group (RESET)
The RESET virtual reality software will be integrated in the META QUEST 3 glasses (Meta Platforms, San Francisco, CA, US).
The RESET virtual reality software will be integrated into META QUEST 3 glasses (Meta Platforms, San Francisco, CA, US) by DYNAMICS.
Active Comparator: Usual care (UC)
3 session/week of 90 minutes of physical therapy and occupational therapy.
The UC intervention consists of 3 sessions/week of 90' of physical therapy and occupational therapy conducted by a physiotherapist and an occupational therapist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disability (The Barthel index)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
An ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living. It consists of 10 common activities, with eight of them representing activities related to personal care and 2 related to mobility. These are assessed for independence/dependence and scored via an arbitrary weighting system- the index yields a total score out of 100 - the higher the score, the lower degree of disability.
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life (NEWSQOL)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
The Newcastle Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Measure assess the specific health-related quality of life measure of 56 items grouped into 11 domains: feelings; ADL/self-care; cognition; mobility; emotion; sleep; interpersonal relationships; communication; pain/sensation; vision; and fatigue. Each item is rated in range 0 to 3, and they are not significant individually. The results of each domain are obtained by the sum of the scores of the items, and higher values indicate greater impact on quality of life.
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Upper extremity motor function (Fugl-Meyer assessment of Upper Extremity)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
The test consists of 33 items that evaluate the movement, coordination and reflex action of the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist and hand. Each item is scored on a 3-point scale (0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially, 2=performs fully) and the total score ranges from a minimum of 0 (hemiplegia) to a maximum of 66 points.
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Gross manual dexterity (The Box and Block Test)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
The participant is seated at a table, facing a rectangular box that is divided into two square compartments of equal dimension by means of a partition. A total of 150 colored, wooden cubes or blocks (2.5 cm) are placed in one compartment. The participant is instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment to the other for 60 seconds. The score is the number of blocks moved from one compartment to the other during the trial time. The patient's hand must cross over the partition in order for a point to be given, and blocks that drop or bounce out of the second compartment onto the floor are still rewarded with a point. Multiple blocks carried over at the same time, count as a single point. Higher scores on the test indicate better gross manual dexterity.
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Digital dynamometry will be used to assess the muscular strength in kilograms of both the affected and non-affected upper extremities.Participants will execute the test three times with each hand and the best score will be used to calculate the average of the three repetitions. The non-paretic side will be used as a reference for the paretic side.
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Lower extremity function (Berg Balance Scale)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
The Berg Balance Scale is a quantitative assessment of balance in older adults. The scale consists of 14 items requiring subjects to maintain positions or complete movement tasks (common to everyday life) of varying levels of difficulty. Items receive a score of 0-4 based on ability to meet the specific time and distance requirements of the test. 0 represents inability to complete the item and a 4 represents the ability to complete it independently.
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Lower extremity function (Time Up and Go test)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
The Time Up and Go assesses the ability to perform sequential motor tasks relative to walking and turning. The test requires participants to stand up from a chair, walk a distance of 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and seat by themselves in the minimum timeframe possible. The time taken to complete the test is registered.
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Cognitive function
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA, consists of 10 simple questions or tasks related to cognitive function. Typically, these are grouped into the following cognitive domains: short term memory, visuospatial abilities, executive functions, attention, concentration, working memory, language, and orientation to time and place. The total score ranges 0-30. Higher scores indicating better cognitive performance.
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Cognitive function
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
The Trail-Making Test will be used to assess the executive function. Successful performance of this test requires letter and number recognition, mental flexibility, visual scanning, and motor function. The Part A consists of 25 circles with the numbers 1-25 written randomly in the circles. The participant is required to connect the circles with a pencil as quickly as possible (i.e. number one to number two, etc). The Part B of the test consists of 25 circles, 13 of them numbered 1 to 13 and, and 12 lettered A to L, randomly distributed over a page of paper. The participant is required to connect the circles with a pencil as quickly as possible, alternating between numbers and letters and taking both series in ascending sequence (i.e. 1, A, 2, B, 3, C…). The time taken to complete the task and the number of errors are recorded in seconds. Greater time indicates greater impairment.
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Plasma concentrations of inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Interleukin 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 (ng/mL)
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
BDNF quantification in blood
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Change in Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (ng/mL)
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
GDNF quantification in blood
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Change in Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (ng/mL)
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
PACAP-38 quantification in blood
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Change in Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide-38 (ng/mL)
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Plasma concentrations of inflammatory markers, quantification in blood
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Change in Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) (ng/mL)
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
IGF-1 quantification in blood
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Change in Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 (ng/mL)
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
NGF quantification in blood
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26
Change in Nerve Growth Factor (ng/mL)
Changes from baseline to weeks 13 and 26

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alberto Soriano-Maldonado, PhD, Universidad de Almeria

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All individual participant data will be shared once the study is finalised and the main results are published. IPD can be obtained by contacting the responsible party.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Two years (24 months) after the study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The PI must be contacted and a minimum number of co-authors from the research team must be included in any publication.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Nintendo Switch (Nintendo Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan)

Subscribe