Effect of Acupuncture Dry Needle in Treatment of Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain

February 14, 2024 updated by: Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

Short Term Effect of Acupuncture Dry Needle in Treatment of Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Low back pain affects about 60% to 90% of the working-age population in modern industrial society. Chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP) is the most common problem of the working-age population in modern industrial society; it causes a substantial economic burden due to the wide use of medical services and absence from work. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the short-term effect of acupuncture dry needle in treatment of chronic mechanical low back pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Low back pain affects about 60% to 90% of the working-age population in modern industrial society. Chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP) is the most common problem of the working-age population in modern industrial society; it causes a substantial economic burden due to the wide use of medical services and absence from work. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the short-term effect of acupuncture dry needle in treatment of chronic mechanical low back pain. Thirty patients their age ranged from 20 - 45 years participated in our study and divided randomly into two equal groups suffering from nonspecific low back pain. The first group (A) consist of 15 patients receiving acupuncture dry needle over trigger points of back muscles followed by stretching and strengthening exercises for back muscles, the second group (B) consist of 15 patients receiving only stretching and strengthening exercises for back muscles. The following parameters including pain severity, functional disability and lumbar range of motion (flexion, extension, right side bending and left side bending) were measured before and after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Riyadh
      • Al-Kharj, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11942
        • Walid Kamal Abdelbasset

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ranges from 20 to 45 years old.
  2. Pain of at least 30 mm to 70 mm on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst imaginable pain).
  3. Presence of MTrPs at least in 4 muscles on any side.
  4. Patients had lower back myofascial pain syndrome for at least 3 months ago.

Exclusion Criteria:

A history of previous back surgery, neurologic deficit, current lower extremity symptoms, cardiopulmonary disease with decreased activity tolerance, rheumatologic conditions, polyarticular osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and advanced lumbar degenerative disease, patients receiving other treatment in the form of physical therapy or medication for the duration of the study that may interfere with the results of this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Acupuncture dry needle
This group received acupuncture dry needle over trigger points of back muscles followed by stretching and strengthening exercises for back muscles, 2 sessions per week for 2 weeks.
The muscles that have been treated iliocostalis lumborum, quadratus lumborum, gluteus medius and piriformis muscles. The patients received 2 sessions per week for 2 weeks.
No Intervention: Stretching and strengthening exercises
This group received only stretching and strengthening exercises for back muscles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Four weeks
Pain was assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS is a scale that allows continuous data analysis and uses a 10 cm line with 0 in one end (no pain) and 10 (worst pain) on the other end. Patients were asked to place a mark along the line to denote their level of pain.
Four weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional disability
Time Frame: Four weeks
Functional disability of each patient was assessed by Oswestery disability questionnaire. It is valid and reliable tool. It is consists of 10 multiple choice questions for back pain, patient select one sentence out of six that best describe his pain, Higher scores indicated great pain. Scores (0-20%) minimal disability, Scores (20%- 40%) moderate, Scores (40% - 60%) severe, Scores (60%-80%) crippled, Scores (80% - 100%) patients are confined to bed.
Four weeks
Lumbar range of motion
Time Frame: Four weeks
Modified-modified Schober flexion technique was used based on the work of Williams et al. This method is reliable and valid in measuring range of motion of lumbar flexion. The investigator stood behind the standing patient to identify the posterior superior iliac spines with her or his thumbs, and then an ink mark was drawn along the midline of the lumbar spine horizontal to the posterior superior iliac spines. Another ink mark was made 15 cm above the original mark; the distance between superior and inferior skin marks was measured. Then the investigator instructed the patient to bend forward into full lumbar flexion and the new distance between superior and inferior skin marks was measured.
Four weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RHPT/022/035

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Acupuncture dry needle

Subscribe