Individualized Alpha Neurofeedback for ADHD

May 29, 2026 updated by: Winnie Wan Yee Tso (Dr), The University of Hong Kong

Examine the Effectiveness of Individualized Alpha Neurofeedback for Children With ADHD, a Triple-blinded Randomised Control Trial

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorders, characterised by inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Although pharmacotherapy is considered the first-line treatment for ADHD at all ages (at least for severe cases), non-pharmacological therapies might be equally effective without the risk of drug side effects. Some studies have shown that electroencephalographic (EEG) neurofeedback improves parent-rated ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents. However, whether neurofeedback is an effective treatment for ADHD is still under debate.

Several issues may hinder the evaluation of the effectiveness of neurofeedback treatment in previous studies. Firstly, previous neurofeedback studies did not utilize effective neurophysiological markers for ADHD. Theta/Beta ratio, the most common neurofeedback marker for treating ADHD in the past two decades, has recently been suggested to be only weakly correlated to individuals' attention. Secondly, previous studies mostly used the norm of the EEG markers in age/gender matched healthy children as the training target for ADHD children, which largely ignored the individual variations in EEG acquisition. Third, most of the previous studies lack a rigorous study design, for comparing neurofeedback with a 'placebo' condition and evaluating its specific and non-specific effects.

In the current studies, we propose to conduct a sham-controlled, triple-blind trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an individual-based neurofeedback treatment for ADHD children and adolescents. The EEG marker for neurofeedback in treating ADHD would be the individualized lower/higher alpha band power, based on the recent methodological advances in EEG spectrum processing (1/f model fit and individualized peak alpha frequency modelling) . The training target will be individualized and defined according to the neurophysiological pattern shown in pre-training resting-state conditions, and thus each participant will be trained to achieve their own optimum state of engagement. Sham neurofeedback will be used as a placebo condition, controlling for the non-specific effect of neurofeedback. The study will be triple-blinded (i.e, participants, individuals who administered treatment or intervention, and those who assessed the outcomes were masked).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

120 ADHD children will be invited to join the RCT neurofeedback training. They will be randomly assigned to one of two groups (neurofeedback group, sham feedback group, ). For the neurofeedback group participants will undergo an 4-week neurofeedback training (twice a week); for the sham feedback group, participants will undergo an 4-week sham feedback training (twice a week), All the groups will conduct cognitive and EEG tests before and after the 4-week period and the investigators will follow up with all the participants immediately after the training and 6-month after the training. When recruiting, participants and parents of the participants will be notified that their children are likely to be assigned to one of the three groups, and for the neurofeedback and sham feedback group, the parents and participants will not know which condition they are enrolled in, until the end of the study. By the end of the study, participants from the sham feedback group will be given an opportunity to rejoin a neurofeedback session for compensation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 0000
        • Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fulfilment of the DSM-IV-TR criteria for ADHD
  • No intention to use new medication/change dosage/join new non-pharmacological treatment program during the intervention period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of cerebral palsy/ history of structural brain abnormalities on CT/ MRI;
  • full-scale IQ score (FSIQ) < 70;
  • A history of seizure or prior electroencephalogram abnormalities related to epilepsy.
  • Having comorbid psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, epilepsy, or traumatic brain injury; current substance abuse or dependence
  • Planned other behavioural/durg treatment during the intervention period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham neurofeedback
The sham neurofeedback protocol was identical to the verum neurofeedback protocol except that the animation (horizontal plane movement) was based on the EEG results of another participant. EMG-based feedback will still be provided for the sham condition
Experimental: Individualized alpha neurofeedback
Real time visual feedback will be given the participants, such that as the higher/lower alpha power increases (relative to the mean value in the pre-training resting state EEG recording) a plane on the screen will move horizontally (the movement is correspondent to the magnitude of upper/lower alpha ratio), and the animation will change based on EEG parameter every 2 seconds. EMG-based feedback is also provided, such that if the children's EMG level is too high the plane will drop (vertical movement). Participants are instructed to 'fly' the plane as far as possible.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Conners CPT (Conners Continuous Performance Test)
Time Frame: prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention
The Conners Continuous Performance Test (CPT) is a computerized neuropsychological assessment designed to evaluate attention, impulsivity, and vigilance in children and adolescents aged 8-18 years. The test involves the presentation of letters on a computer screen, where the participant must respond to specific target letters while ignoring others. The Conners CPT provides measures of response time, errors, and variability, which can aid in the identification of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other attention-related problems.
prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention
Strengths and Weaknesses of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Symptoms and Normal Behavior Scale (SWAN)
Time Frame: prior to the intervention, immediate after the interventions & 6 months after the intervention
The Chinese SWAN is a validated instrument for the assessment of ADHD symptoms in Chinese children in Hong Kong. The SWAN questionnaire was originally devised by Swanson et al in 2005 based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for ADHD.
prior to the intervention, immediate after the interventions & 6 months after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC):
Time Frame: prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention
The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) is a comprehensive, standardized intelligence test designed for children and adolescents aged 6-16 years. The WISC measures cognitive abilities across various domains, including verbal comprehension, visual-spatial abilities, fluid reasoning, working memory, and processing speed. The test consists of several subtests, each designed to assess different aspects of cognitive functioning. The WISC is widely used in educational and clinical settings to help identify learning difficulties, intellectual giftedness, and other cognitive issues that may impact a child's academic performance and daily functioning
prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention
PedsQL (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory)
Time Frame: prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention & 6 months after the intervention
The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) is a reliable and validated instrument for assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents aged 2-18 years. It consists of 23 items, covering four domains: physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and school functioning. The PedsQL is designed to measure the impact of various health conditions on children's daily lives and well-being.
prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention & 6 months after the intervention
SDQ (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire)
Time Frame: prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention 6 months after the intervention
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioral screening questionnaire for children and adolescents aged 2-17 years. It consists of 25 items, covering five domains: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior. The SDQ is designed to help identify mental health problems and promote emotional well-being in children and adolescents.
prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention 6 months after the intervention
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Time Frame: prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention & 6 months after the intervention
The CBCL is a 120 item parent-report, which provides a measure of behavioral and emotional functioning and social competence of youth, aged six to 18
prior to the intervention, immediate after the intervention & 6 months after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Winnie WY Tso, MBBS, The University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADHD

Clinical Trials on Sham neurofeedback

Subscribe