Effects of Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Neck and Low Back Pain

Effects of Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Neck and Low Back Pain: a Quadruple-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (pPNS) is a physical therapy technique, whose main objective is to treat neuro-musculo-skeletal signs and symptoms by applying a current to a peripheric nerve with a blunt dry needle. Despite its clinical use being already stablished, its use in pathologic subjects is still unknown and, thus, so is its optimal parameterization. The present study proposes to perform two different protocols of peripheral nerve stimulation on neck and low back pain subjects to answer those questions and compared it towards a control group receiving a standard intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intervention will be performed on the Spinal Nerve (for neck pain subjects) and Inferior Gluteal Nerve and Tibial Nerve (for low back pain subjects), using ultrasonography to guide the needle insertion, without risk of affecting any adjacent structure. The theoretical basis of the technique is to produce analgesia by making controlled changes in the somatosensory system using synaptic plasticity, to ultimate affect the perception of pain through reduction of nociception afference. The protocols will be the following:

  • Intervention Group 1: Sensory Threshold, high frequency in trains (ST-bHF). 5 trains of 5 seconds, separated by 55 seconds from each other, at a frequency of 100 hertz (Hz), making 5 minutes of total treatment. The intensity will be set at patient's sensory threshold, ensuring a non-painful perception.
  • Intervention Group 2: Theta-Burst Stimulation (TBS). 40 trains separated 10 seconds apart, where each train contains 5 trains separated by 200ms, at a frequency of 5 hertz, resulting in 6 minutes and 45 seconds of total intervention. The intensity will be set at patient's motor threshold, ensuring a non-painful stimulation.
  • Intervention Group 3: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), at a frequency of 80 hertz and a pulse width of 250 microseconds, for 15 minutes. The intensity will be set at the detection threshold of each patient, generating a sensitive but not painful sensory but not painful.

The study will be a randomised quadruple-blind clinical trial. Two pPNS protocols (ST-bHF, TBS) and a third TENS protocol (TENS) will be compared. To study the effects of these protocols on pain, strength, functionality and electromyographic activity, three measurements will be performed: pre-intervention (Numerical Pain Scale (NRS), NRS for induced pain, Maximal strength + EMG), during the intervention (EMG) and immediately post-intervention (NRS, NRS for induced pain, Maximal strength + EMG). In addition, one week later, subjects will be asked for a pain NRS to assess the mid-term treatment effect.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain
        • Ionclinics & DEIONICS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (+18 years)
  • Patients with non-specific/mechanical/articular neck pain.
  • Patients with non-specific/mechanical/articular low back pain and/or low back pain accompanied by radicular symptomatology or sciatica.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy.
  • Severe illnesses: diabetes, cancer, neurological diseases, depression, etc...
  • Balanophora (needle phobia).
  • Professional athlete.
  • Other concomitant physiotherapy treatment for this pathology.
  • Patients with neck or low back pain associated with severe bone damage such as fractures or vertebral fissures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Theta-Burst Stimulation
The technique consists of percutaneous peripheral electrical stimulation on the Spinal or Inferior Gluteal and Tibial Nerve through a ultrasound-guided needle.
The ultrasound guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation will be applied to the Spinal or Inferior Gluteal and Tibial Nerve. The parameters will be 40 trains separated by 7 seconds from each other, where each train contains 5 trains separated by 200ms, at a frequency of 5Hz, resulting in 6 minutes and 45 seconds of total treatment. The intensity will be set at the motor threshold of the patient, ensuring a non-painful stimulation.
Active Comparator: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
The technique consists of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the trapezius or low back and internal calf muscles through surface electrodes.
The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation will be applied on the trapezius or low back and internal calf muscles at a frequency of 80Hz and a pulse width of 250 microseconds, for 15 minutes. The intensity will be set at the detection threshold of each patient generating a sensitive but non-painful perception.
Experimental: Sensory Threshold, Burst High Frequency
The technique consists of percutaneous peripheral electrical stimulation on the Spinal or Inferior Gluteal and Tibial Nerve through a ultrasound-guided needle.
The ultrasound guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation will be applied to the Spinal or Inferior Gluteal and Tibial Nerve. The parameters will be 5 trains of 5 seconds, 55 seconds apart, at a frequency of 100Hz, making 5 minutes of total treatment. The intensity will be set 200 microamperes (μA) above the detection threshold for each patient, guaranteeing a sensitive but not painful perception.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
The subject will verbally report the pain intensity suffered along the last week according to the Numeric rate scale (NRS): 0 will be any pain and 10 will be the maximal perception of pain.
Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-intervention
Patients will fill a demographic data questionnaire with descriptive variables such as age, sex, work, time with pain, concomitant pathologies, level of sporting activity, toxic habits and drugs.
Pre-intervention
Change in maximum strength during muscle contraction with dynamometer
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
The maximum strength achievable given the condition will be assessed by means of a dynamometry test. Neck pain subjects will stand up and perform a maximum voluntary trapezius contraction by raising the shoulder towards the ceiling. Low back pain subjets will be in prone position, resting the trunk on the bed, but no the lower limbs, that will be resting on the floor. They will perform a maximum voluntary unilateral hip extension with the homolateral leg extended and the other leg resting on the floor. In order to not influence the measurement, all subjects will receive the same instructions on how to perform the contraction: "fast and hard", and will be encouraged during the task. Three test will be performed, and a first familiarisation test will be discarded. The rest between measurements will be 1 minute.
Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Change in pain
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and one week after the intervention

The subject will verbally report a mean of the last week pain intensity according to the Numeric rate scale (NRS) from 0 to 10: 0 will be any pain and 10 will be the maximal perception of pain.

One week after the intervention, and after having received a conventional physiotherapy treatment, subjects will verbally report a mean of the last week pain intensity according to the Numeric rate scale (NRS).

Pre-intervention and one week after the intervention
Change in pain evoked with movement
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Participants will be asked to perform a motion that evokes pain related to their pathology. After performing the movement, the pain perception will be obtained from 0 to 10 according to the NRS scale: 0 will be any pain and 10 will be the maximal perception of pain.
Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Change in surface electromyography signal during muscle contraction
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Electrical activity of trapezius muscle (descending fibres) or gluteus maximus muscle will be measured synchronously with strength. Electromyography measurement will be performed in order to collect the muscle excitation signal during the muscle contraction. For the trapezius, electrodes will be placed in the middle of an imaginary line joining prominences of the acromion and C7's spinous apophysis. For the gluteus maximus, the electrodes will be placed in the middle of an imaginary line joining prominences of the sacrum and trochanter.
Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Surface electromyography signal during stimulation
Time Frame: During intervention
Electrical activity of trapezius muscle (descending fibres) or gluteus maximus and internal calf muscle will be measured synchronously with treatment application. Electromyography measurement will be performed in order to collect the muscle excitation signal during the electrical stimulation. For the trapezius, the electrodes will be placed in the middle of an imaginary line joining prominences of the acromion and C7's spinous apophysis. For the gluteus maximus, the electrodes will be placed in the middle of an imaginary line joining prominences of the sacrum and trochanter. For the inner calf, a plantar flexion will be requested to the subject to visualize the center of the muscle belly, where the electrodes will be placed.
During intervention
Treatment-evoked perceptions questionnaire
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
After the stimulation, subjects will be asked about their perceptions related to sensations during stimulation (pleasant- displeasing- indifferent), contraction of the area during the treatment (increasingly- decreasingly- equal), and changes in the strength of the treated area (more- less- equal).
Immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Enrique Velasco Serna, PhD, VIB-KULeuven

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Theta-Burst Stimulation

Subscribe