Transversus Thoracis Plane Block Versus Parasternal Intercostal Nerve Plane Block for Cardiac Surgery

January 28, 2024 updated by: Rehab Abd-Allah Wahdan, Zagazig University

Role of Transversus Thoracis Plane Block Versus Parasternal Intercostal Nerve Plane Block in Enhanced Recovery Program After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

Traditionally postoperative pain management after cardiac surgery has been based on opiate analgesics. However, opiates have some undesirable dose-related side-effects such as nausea, constipation, vomiting, dizziness, mental confusion and respiratory depression, which substantially influence patient recovery and may delay discharge after surgery.

The American Society of Anesthesiologists has endorsed multi- modal analgesia, involving multiple analgesics with differing modes of action, to reduce the overreliance on opioid-based postsurgical analgesic regimens and the associated adverse effects.

The safety of using the transversus thoracis muscle plane block (TTP) or the parasternal intercostal nerve block (PSI block) for cardiac surgeries allow to make the option of using opioids alone and the possibility of its complications not the rule in post-operative pain relief in cardiac surgeries.

In the current study, improving the quality of the transversus thoracis muscle plane block (TTP) or the parasternal intercostal nerve block (PSI block) for cardiothoracic surgeries by enhancing post-operative pain relief becomes more and more required to cope up with the new surgical modalities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is an international effort to develop perioperative programs aimed at optimizing patient outcomes and healthcare delivery efficiency. These programs are composed of intervention bundles based on the principles of best practice, standardized and consistent healthcare delivery, regular audit, and team feedback, all with a patient-centered focus. Implementation of such programs has resulted in patient and healthcare benefits, including promising early results within the cardiac surgical community.

A perioperative, multimodal, opioid-sparing, pain management plan is classified as B-NR (B-level evidence, nonrandomized studies) in the classification of recommendation and level of evidence. The ERAS Cardiac Society's grading of this recommendation is appropriate because it is a laudable goal that requires additional research. Areas of investigation to refine postoperative pain management include the following: managing patient and provider expectations, individualizing the dose and types of analgesics, consideration of the potential cardioprotective effects of opioids, and incorporating nonpharmacologic approaches to pain management such as regional anesthesia.

Pain after cardiac surgery is caused by several factors; sternotomy, sternal/rib retraction, pericardiotomy, internal mammarian artery harvesting, saphenous vein harvesting, surgical manipulation of the parietal pleura, chest tube insertion and other musculoskeletal trauma during surgery.

Postoperative pain management remains an important clinical challenge in cardiothoracic surgery. Inadequate postoperative pain control may have adverse pathophysiologic sequelae, including increased myocardial oxygen demand, hypoventilation, suboptimal clearance of pulmonary secretions, acute respiratory failure, and decreased mobility, with associated increased risks for thromboembolic events. These adverse events may result in greater perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Despite several multimodal approaches to postoperative pain control, optimal pain management after cardiothoracic procedures remains elusive.

Regional anesthesia (RA) is often included in enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) as an important component of a bundle of interventions to improve outcomes after surgery. Regional anesthesia techniques, including neuraxial and peripheral nerve block, can provide many benefits for patients in the perioperative period. These benefits include a decrease in postoperative pain (subsequently reducing opioid consumption and associated adverse effects), decrease in nausea and vomiting, improvement in mobilization and recovery of gastrointestinal function, decrease in length of stay (LOS), reduction in surgical stress response, and potentially, reduction in morbidity and mortality. They are therefore commonly used to improve quality of patient care and have also been used as a key component of many enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs).

The transversus thoracis muscle plane block (TTP) is a newly developed regional anesthesia technique which provides analgesia to the anterior chest wall. First described by Ueshima and Kitamura in 2015, the TTP block is a single-shot nerve block that deposits local anesthetic in the transversus thoracis muscle plane between the internal intercostal and transversus thoracis muscles. In the original ultrasound- guided cadaveric study, the TTP block was found to cover the T2-T6 intercostal nerves.

The anterior branches of these intercostal nerves dominate the sensory innervation of the internal mammary region, suggesting this new technique had potential to provide analgesia for surgery of the anterior chest wall.

Another technique for blocking multiple anterior branches of intercostal nerves, named the parasternal intercostal nerve block (PSI block). To perform a PSI block, we inject a local anesthetic between the pectoral major muscle and the external intercostal muscle. Because anterior branches of the intercostal nerve penetrate through these two muscles to innervate the internal mammary area, injection of a local anesthetic to this plane could block anterior branches of intercostal nerves.

Parasternal intercostal nerve blocks using local anesthetic agents have been shown to provide improved postoperative pain control and decreased opioid requirements with fewer potential complications.

This study can reduce economic cost by ENHANCED RECOVERY After Surgery (ERAS) (early extubation, reduce ICU and hospital stay) and improving postoperative analgesia. Implementation of such programs has resulted in patient and healthcare benefits, including promising early results within the cardiac surgical community.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Rehab A Wahdan, MD
  • Phone Number: 002 01003481323
  • Email: obz13w@yahoo.com

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Elsharqya
      • Zagazig, Elsharqya, Egypt, 44519
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient acceptance.
  • Sex: both; male and female
  • Age (21-60) years old.
  • American society of anesthesiology (ASA): II and III.
  • Body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2
  • Elective cardiac surgeries requiring median sternotomy.
  • Accepted mental state of the patient.
  • Non-smoker or ex-smoker for more than one month.
  • Optimal preoperative glycemic control, defined by a hemoglobin A1c level less than 6.5%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal and lack of informed consent.
  • Emergency or non-median sternotomy surgery.
  • History of allergy to local anesthetics (lidocaine or bupivicaine).
  • Coexisting hematologic disorders or malnourished patient.
  • Pre-existing major organ dysfunction including hepatic or renal failure, and left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
  • Peripheral neuropathy.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Patients with a diagnosis of cognitive impairment.
  • Significant psychiatric illnesses including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, uncontrolled anxiety, or depression.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Patients will not receive any regional injections
Active Comparator: The transversus thoracis muscle plane block (TTP) group
Patients will receive the TTP block with administration of 20 ml volume of local anesthetics (Lidocaine 2% + Bupivicaine 0.5% 1:1 mixture + 8mg dexamethasone) bilaterally
patient in supine position with chest exposed and monitored by beat-to-beat arterial tracing and standard monitors. After determining the anterior T4-T5 interspace using US, the US probe places in the longitudinal plane 1 cm lateral to the sternal border. A parasternal sagittal view of the internal intercostal muscle and the transversus thoracis muscle between the fourth and fifth rib will be visualized above the pleura. A 22-gage needle will be inserted in plane to the transducer with the tip of the needle located in the TTP between the internal intercostal and transversus thoracis muscles. After excluding intravascular and intrapleural placement, LA will administer with intermittent aspiration (administration of 20 ml volume of local anesthetics (Lidocaine 2% +Bupivicaine 0.5% 1:1 mixture + 8mg dexamethasone) on each side. After block administration, the patients will be monitored for LA toxicity, hemodynamic instability, and allergic or unexpected adverse reactions for 20 minutes.
Active Comparator: The parasternal intercostal nerve block (PSI block) group
Patients will receive the PSI block with administration of 20 ml volume of local anesthetics (Lidocaine 2% + Bupivicaine 0.5% 1:1 mixture + 8mg dexamethasone) bilaterally
patient in supine position with chest exposed and monitored by beat-to-beat arterial tracing and standard. Ultrasound scan will be performed from lateral to medial in the intercostal space. The intercostal muscles and pleura will be identified along the lower border of the rib. At the lateral border of the sternum, internal thoracic vessels lying anterior to transverse thoracic muscle are identified. The needle will be inserted in-plane to follow its tip using 4-mL injections per intercostal space across levels two through six bilaterally, for a total of 40 mL (Lidocaine 2% +Bupivicaine 0.5% 1:1 mixture + 8mg dexamethasone)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in assessment of postoperative pain will be assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) scale
Time Frame: at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours postoperatively
scale of 0-10, the patient will learn to quantify postoperative pain where 0= No pain and 10= Maximum worst pain.
at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours postoperatively
The first requirement for analgesia:
Time Frame: within 24 hour postoperative
The time from injection of LA to patient first request of analgesia
within 24 hour postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total amount of morphine consumed
Time Frame: within 24 hour postoperative
Total amount of morphine given to each patient
within 24 hour postoperative
Extubation time
Time Frame: within 24 hour postoperative
Time from ICU admission to the time the endotracheal tube will be pulled out
within 24 hour postoperative
ICU stay
Time Frame: within 24 hour postoperative
Time from ICU admission to time of discharge to ward
within 24 hour postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Howaida A Kamal, MD, Faculty of medicine, zagazig university, Egypt

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

planned after the completion of the study and publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

planned after the completion of the study and publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

principal investigator

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Surgery

Clinical Trials on transversus thoracis muscle plane block (TTP)

Subscribe