The Efficacy of Hemp-containing Cream Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Uremic Pruritus

March 25, 2024 updated by: Suthiya Anumas, Thammasat University Hospital

This Study Aims to Compare the Efficacy of Hemp-containing Cream and a Placebo in the Treatment of Uremic Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients. Patients Were Randomly Assigned Either the Hemp-containing Cream or a Placebo and Evaluated the WI-NRS and Skindex-10 Scores at Week 2, 4.

Uremic pruritus is a significant burden on hemodialysis patients, affecting approximately 46% of individuals undergoing dialysis. Various mechanisms, including inadequate dialysis, increased uremic toxins, inflammatory cytokines, parathyroid hormone, phosphorus, dry skin, mast cell histamine secretion, and nerve stimulation through μ-opioid receptors and nociceptors, contribute to uremic pruritus. Current treatments include antihistamines, gabapentin, moisturizer creams, and capsaicin creams, with limited success, as only 10% of patients find relief. Cannabinoids were also mentioned in uremic pruritus treatment but are less commonly used and there are no randomised controlled trial. Cannabinoid binding to CB1 and CB2 receptors inhibits mast cell differentiation, aggregation, and histamine release, whereas cannabinoid binding to TRP-iron receptors reduces peripheral nerve activation. Thus, cannabinoid seem to effective in relieving pruritus via various mechanisms.

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a hemp-containing cream in comparison to a placebo for treating uremic pruritus among hemodialysis patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Eligible participants is randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a hemp-containing cream or a placebo. then, they are assessed for the severity of itching symptoms using the WI-NRS and their itch-related quality of life using the Skindex-10 score at baseline, week 2, and week 4 of the study. Additionally, adverse effects are documented. Data is collected by the research assistant and recorded in computer with locking password and also was validated with second assistant.

We planned for a sample size of 60 participants to detect differences in itchinEligible participants is randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a hemp-containing cream or a placebo. then, they are assessed for the severity of itching symptoms using the WI-NRS and their itch-related quality of life using the Skindex-10 score at baseline, week 2, and week 4 of the study. Additionally, adverse effects are documented. Data is collected by the research assistant and recorded in computer with locking password and also is validated with second assistant.

For statistical analysis, continuous variables are compared using an unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Categorical variables are compared using a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The adjusted mean difference is used Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) , adjusted by score at baseline.

All statistical analyses were performed using Stata v.17.0 (StataCorp, Texas).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pathum Thani, Thailand, 12120
        • Thammasat

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults ≥ 18 years old, diagnosed with end-stage kidney disease
  • Undergoing thrice-weekly chronic hemodialysis for more than 90 days
  • Exhibit a WI-NRS score of 3 or higher

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ahistory of hemp allergy
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Dermatologic diseases
  • Adjustments to medications for controlling itch within the 14 days preceding the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: hemp group
They was assigned to apply the hemp-containing cream.
The application of the hemp-containing cream occurred in the morning and evening on the itching areas, excluding the face for 4 weeks.
Placebo Comparator: Control group
They was assigned to apply the placebo cream.
The application of the placebo cream occurred in the morning and evening on the itching areas, excluding the face for 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WI-NRS (Worst Itching Numerical Rating scale) score at week 4
Time Frame: week 4
WI-NRS score will demonstrate the severity of itch at week 4. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 10. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WI-NRS at week 2
Time Frame: week 2
WI-NRS score will demonstrate the severity of itch at week 2. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 10. The higher scores mean a worse outcome. The minimum score is 10 and maximum score is 60. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 2
Skindex-10 score at weeks 2 and 4
Time Frame: week 2 and 4
Skindex-10 score will demonstrate the itch-related quality of life at week 2 and 4. The minimum score is 10 and maximum score is 60. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 2 and 4
the mean difference score between baseline and week 4 for WI-NRS and the Skindex-10 score
Time Frame: week 4
The change of WI-NRS score and Skindex-10 score between baseline and week 4 represents the change of severity and QOL after complete study (week4) compare to baseline. The greater different scores mean a better outcome.
week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Suthiya Anumas, Thammasat University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 074/2566

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uremic Pruritus

Clinical Trials on Hemp

Subscribe