QualiTy of Life Evaluation in Patients With ChRonic ObstructIve Pulmonary Disease Who Require Tiotropium as additiOnal treatmeNt. (TRITON)

February 19, 2024 updated by: Elpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.

A Multicenter, Non-interventional, Observational Clinical Trial to Assess the Quality of Life in Patients With ChRonic ObstructIve Pulmonary Disease Who Require Tiotropium as additiOnal treatmeNt.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex, heterogeneous disease usually with a decline lung function and worsening symptoms; hence, both forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1; lung function) and validated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used in clinical trials to assess disease severity and response to treatment.

The PROs are different in terms of their scope of assessment and in the information that they capture. PRO questionnaires such as the Baseline Dyspnoea Index (BDI), Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale are used to assess dyspnoea, whereas the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) are commonly used to assess patients' health status .

Furthermore, the mMRC scale is unidirectional and minimally responsive to treatment interventions, while the BDI, TDI, CAT, CCQ and SGRQ (approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration) are multidirectional.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

With the availability of numerous PROs, it is important to understand which provide a better evaluation of patients' health status and demonstrate responses to treatment. Even when PROs evaluate the same parameter, e.g. dyspnoea, they may not always capture a uniform response. Hence, it would be useful to examine if the PROs correlate with each other and whether any specific PROs better reflect treatment benefit (as expressed by minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs)) than the others. Furthermore, understanding the relationship between the PROs and lung function (FEV1) may provide insights into whether a change in lung function translates to a change perceptible by the patients (assessed through PROs).

Tiotropium is a potent, long-acting, selective anticholinergic bronchodilator. Treatment with tiotropium produces sustained improvements in lung function, particularly FEV1 (peak, trough, average, and area under the curve) compared with either placebo or ipratropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Preliminary evidence suggests that treatment with tiotropium may slow the rate of decline in FEV1, but this finding awaits confirmation. Tiotropium reduces lung hyperinflation, with associated improvements in exercise capacity. Tiotropium, compared with either placebo or ipratropium, improves a variety of patient-centered outcomes, including subjective dyspnea ratings and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) scores. Tiotropium reduces the frequency of COPD exacerbations and of hospitalizations due to exacerbations, but has not been shown to reduce all-cause mortality. Compared with the long-acting bronchodilators, tiotropium provides incrementally better bronchodilation, but it is not clearly superior in terms of patient-centered outcomes. Tiotropium has a good safety profile; however patients with severe cardiac disease, bladder outlet obstruction, or narrow angle glaucoma were excluded from all studies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients patients (≥40 years old) with a diagnosis of Chronic Respiratory Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who were treated with ICS/LABA, LABA/LAMA with a LABA or ICS/LABA or were not receiving long-acting bronchodilators (LABA or LAMA) for COPD and required addition of tiotropium from 1 to 7 days before the start of the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients (≥40 years old) with a diagnosis of Chronic Respiratory Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
  2. Patients who were treated with Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA, LABA/LAMA with a LABA or ICS/LABA or were not receiving long-acting bronchodilators (LABA or LAMA) for COPD and required addition of tiotropium from 1 to 7 days before the start of the study.
  3. Patients who are able to provide informed consent and follow study procedures and requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. According to the contraindications of the product's Summary of Product Characteristics.
  2. Patients receiving LAMA monotherapy prior to study entry.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life assesment
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnea assesment
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in Baseline Dyspnoea Index, BDI at baseline and Transition Dyspnoea Index, TDI between study visits and after 6 months treatment.
6 months
COPD Assessment Test
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in CAT (COPD Assessment Test) between study visits and after 6 months of treatment.
6 months
FEV1 % predicted measurement
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in FEV1% predicted and other spirometric parameters (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC) during study visits and after 6 months of tiotropium treatment
6 months
Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler (FSI-10) questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in FSI-10 questionnaire for patients satisfaction after 6 months of tiotropium treatment.
6 months
Exacerbations
Time Frame: 6 months
Report of number of median exacerbations that will be appeared during 6 months of tiotropium treatment
6 months
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 6 months
Report the number of Adverse Events during study period
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD

Clinical Trials on Tiotropium treated patients

Subscribe