Early Age-Related Hearing Loss Investigation (EARHLI) (EARHLI)

July 31, 2025 updated by: Justin S. Golub, Columbia University

Early Age-Related Hearing Loss Investigation (EARHLI): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Mechanisms Linking Early Age-Related Hearing Loss and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Early Age-Related Hearing Loss Investigation (EARHLI) is a single site study that will randomize late middle age adults to either a hearing intervention (including hearing aids) or a health education intervention. Participants will be followed for 1 year. This study will provide information on reducing cognitive decline in those at risk for Alzheimer's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

EARHLI will be a phase II 1:1 randomized controlled trial of a hearing intervention (including prescription hearing aids) versus a health education program. Participants must be 55-75 years old and have early-stage age-related hearing loss and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. The trial will last 1 year and occur at a single site (Columbia University Irving Medical Center). Outcome measurements will include cognition, social engagement, and change in brain organization/connectivity. Assessments will occur at study start, 6 months, and 12 months. A total of 150 participants will be enrolled (75 per intervention group). Participants will also have a hearing test and a blood test. Approximately half of participants will have two MRI scans. As part of participating, all participants will get prescription hearing aids, either at study start or end.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Recruiting
        • Columbia University Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Justin S Golub, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 55-75 years of age
  • Adult-onset hearing loss of approximately mild to moderate in severity (4-frequency 0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz pure tone average 20 dB to 55 dB HL in better hearing ear)
  • Aidable hearing loss, defined by word recognition score in quiet ≥ 60% in better hearing ear
  • Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) defined by Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE2) score >23, Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) global score equivalent = 0.5, and ADNI3 criteria of Logical Memory II score of ≤6 if 0-7 years of education, ≤9 if 8-15 years, and ≤11 if ≥16 years
  • Availability of a study partner (informant) for the administration of the cognitive screen and the ADCS-Activities of Daily Living-Prevention Instrument (ADCS-ADL-PI)
  • Community-dwelling
  • Fluent in English or Spanish
  • Availability of participant in area for study duration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported congenital hearing loss, known genetic mutation-related hearing loss, or hearing loss onset before middle age (<45 years old)
  • Prior dementia diagnosis
  • Reported disability in ≥ 2 activities of daily living (ADLs)
  • Current or previous consistent hearing aid user (such as utilization of hearing aids within the past 6 months beyond brief trials)
  • Unwillingness to wear hearing aids regularly (≥8 hours/day)
  • Medical contraindications to the use of hearing aids (e.g., actively draining ear)
  • Corrected vision impairment (worse than 20/63 on MNRead Acuity Chart in worse eye)
  • Untreatable conductive hearing loss with air-bone gap > 15 dB in two or more contiguous octave frequencies in both ears

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Hearing Intervention
Participants will receive 4 sessions across 8 weeks with a later booster session and hearing aid fitting. Each session will take ~75 minutes.
The hearing intervention includes an auditory needs assessment, hearing aid fitting, establishing Bluetooth connectivity from hearing aids to devices such as smartphones and computers, systematic orientation and instruction in device use, and provision and discussion of hearing "toolkit" materials for self-management and communication strategies. The hearing intervention is person-centered, focusing on identification of individual needs, setting of specific goals, engagement in shared-informed decision-making, and development of self-management abilities. Intervention-centric outcomes (e.g., hearing aid data logging, real ear measures) to verify the best-practices intervention will be gathered at all 5 intervention sessions as well as weeks 16 and 52. Additional visits to troubleshoot hearing aids or address concerns will be scheduled as needed.
Other: Health Education Intervention
Participants will receive a modified health education program on healthy aging. It will match the number and length of sessions as the hearing intervention, including compliance/phone checks. Participants will be on a waitlist to obtain hearing aids without fee at the end of their 12-month participation.
The evidence-based interactive health education program is designed for older adults and addresses chronic disease and disability prevention. Session content will be individualized for each participant based on a "key," depending on his/her goals/interests. The curriculum includes didactics, activities, and goal setting led by staff trained/certified to deliver the intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FC-SRT) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is the Cognitive Performance Test # 1 ADCS-PACC 1: Evaluates Episodic Memory. Scoring from 0 - 48 and a higher score translates into a preserved function of the episodic memory.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Delayed Recall Log Memory IIa, (DRLM) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is the Cognitive Performance Test # 2 ADCS-PACC 2: Evaluates Episodic Memory. Scoring from 0 - 25 and a higher score translates into a preserved function of the episodic memory.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Digit Symbol Substitution Test, (DSST) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This it the Cognitive Performance test # 3 ADCS-PACC 3: Evaluates speed of processing. Scoring from 0 - 91 and a higher score relates to better performance and speed of processing.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Mini-Mental State Examination 2, (MMSE-2) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is the Cognitive Performance test # 4 ADCS-PACC 4: Evaluates Global Cognition. Scoring from 0 - 30 and a higher score relates to preserved Global Cognition.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Trail Making Test Part B, (TMTB) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is the Cognitive Performance test # 5 Evaluates Episodic Memory. Scored in terms of the time, in seconds, required to complete the trail. 300 seconds = maximum amount of time. The less seconds it takes to complete the trail, the better performance/ episodic memory.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Activities of Daily Living for Mild Cognitive Impairment, (ADCS-ADLPI) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is the Cognitive Performance test # 6: Evaluates the ability of patients to perform Activities of Daily Living. Section a. Scored from 0 - 45: Items 1 to 15. Higher score for each activity equals better performance. Section b. Scored from 0 - 5. Item 16 to 20. Higher score equals better performance
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Social Activity Frequency
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is the Social Engagement and Related Socialization test # 1: Evaluates frequency of social activity participation. Participants are asked on a 5-point scale how often during the past 6 months they engaged in 6 common activities involving socialization. A composite score is created
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSR) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is the Social Engagement and Related Socialization test # 2: Evaluates Social Activity Participation. Scored from 8 - 40 a higher score translates into higher levels of social participation.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Community Integration Measure (CIM) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is the Social Engagement and Related Socialization test # 3: Evaluates Community Integration/Participation. Scored from 10 - 50. Higher scores indicate higher levels of community integration and participation.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Cohens Social Network Index (SNI) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is the Social Engagement and Related Socialization test # 4: Evaluates Social Relationships. Scored from 1 - 12. Higher score indicates a larger number of social roles in which the respondent has regular contact.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
University of California Loneliness Scale (ULS) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is the Social Engagement and Related Socialization test # 5: Evaluates Individuals perception of loneliness. The total score ranges from 20 - 80. Higher scores indicate higher loneliness.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Brain MRI Measures
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 52
Approximately 50% of all participants (random selection) will have a functional brain MRI.
Week 0, Week 52

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hearing Handicap Index for Adults and the Elderly-Short (HHIS) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This test evaluates self perceived hearing handicap. Score ranges from 0 - 48, a higher score indicates higher perception of problems secondary to hearing loss.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Hearing Handicap Index-Short-Significant Other (HHIO) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This test evaluates hearing handicap perceived by subjects significant other. Score ranges from 0 - 48, a higher score indicates higher perception of problems secondary to hearing loss.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This test evaluates a range of hearing disabilities across several domains. Scored from 0 - 120, a higher score indicates better hearing.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale (VFS) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This test evaluates listening-related fatigue in individuals with hearing loss and other communication-based difficulties. Scored from 0 - 40, a higher score indicates more symptoms of fatigue related to hearing loss.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This test evaluates self-report whole-body physical and mental tiredness related to activities of fixed intensity and duration in adults. Scored from 0 - 50, a higher score indicates more symptoms of fatigue.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
Assesses the 9 criterion domains used to diagnose a depressive disorder. Scored 0 - 27 This is the Depression/Depressive Symptom Measure #1: Higher score indicates the presence of more depressive symptoms.
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
CESD-12 Depression (CES) Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is the Depression/Depressive Symptom Measure # 2: Evaluates symptoms of depression. Possible range of scores is 0 -26, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
RAND Short-Form 36 (SF36)
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 28, Week 52
This is a general measure of quality of life
Week 0, Week 28, Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Justin S Golub, MD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Hearing Intervention

Subscribe