Reliability and Validity of Ultrasound for the Assessment of Soft Tissue Properties After Breast Cancer Treatment (SOFT-TI)

December 6, 2024 updated by: An De Groef, Universiteit Antwerpen

Reliability and Validity of Ultrasound for the Assessment of Structural and Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues at the Upper Limb Region in Women After Breast Cancer Treatment

After 1 year, more than 50% experience upper limb (UL) complaints after treatment for breast cancer. These complaints are disabling and cause limitations in daily life and this leads to a decrease in the patient's quality of life. The cause of these UL complaints is complex and multifactorial. Due to breast cancer treatment, the structural (tissue composition and volume) and mechanical (tissue stiffness) properties of the soft tissue may change. These changes can occur in the muscle, skin and surrounding fascia and especially in the soft tissue around the breast and axilla where that treatment is localised.

Ultrasound with specific 'add-on' techniques can objectively assess these features and provide a picture of their role in UL function after breast cancer. The first aim in this study is to investigate the reliability and validity of conventional 2D ultrasound for 1) soft tissue composition and 2) soft tissue thickness at the level of the breast and upper limb. The reliability and validity of shear wave elastography, a specific complement to conventional 2D ultrasound, to assess tissue stiffness will also be examined.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women with a history of primary breast cancer with and without upper limb dysfunctions and an age- and gender-matched healthy control group

Description

  1. Breast cancer patients without upper limb dysfunctions (n=30) Inclusion Criteria

    • Patients with unilateral primary breast cancer
    • Surgery including, either: Mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy or breast conserving surgery with axillary lymph node dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy
    • At least 3 months after surgery or radiotherapy in order to take into account wound healing
    • Comprehensive of the Dutch language
    • QuickDASH score <15/100

    Exclusion Criteria:

    • Bilateral surgery, widespread distance metastases, previous breast surgery
    • Diagnosis of neurological or rheumatological condition
    • upper limb dysfunctions caused by other reasons
  2. Breast cancer patients with upper limb dysfunctions (n=30) Inclusion Criteria

    • Patients with unilateral primary breast cancer
    • Surgery including, either: Mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy or breast conserving surgery with axillary lymph node dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy
    • At least 3 months after surgery or radiotherapy in order to take into account wound healing
    • Comprehensive of the Dutch language
    • QuickDASH score >15/100

    Exclusion Criteria:

    • Bilateral surgery, widespread distance metastases, previous breast surgery
    • Diagnosis of neurological or rheumatological condition
    • upper limb dysfunctions caused by other reasons
  3. Healthy volunteers (n=30)

Inclusion criteria:

  • Healthy women (QuickDASH <15) age-matched with a breast cancer patient from the main study
  • Comprehensive of the Dutch language

Exclusion criteria:

  • upper limb dysfunctions
  • Diagnosis of neurological or rheumatological condition, diabetes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Women after breast cancer with UL dysfunctions
Assessment of soft tissue properties at the upper limb region with clinical assessments and ultrasound
Retest Assessment of soft tissue properties at the upper limb region with clinical assessments and ultrasound
Women after breast cancer without UL dysfunctions
Assessment of soft tissue properties at the upper limb region with clinical assessments and ultrasound
Retest Assessment of soft tissue properties at the upper limb region with clinical assessments and ultrasound
Healthy volunteers
age- and gender-matched control group
Assessment of soft tissue properties at the upper limb region with clinical assessments and ultrasound
Retest Assessment of soft tissue properties at the upper limb region with clinical assessments and ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reliability of soft tissue thickness (mm)
Time Frame: 1 week
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of thickness (mm) of the skin, fat tissue, breast parenchyma, retromammary fat, and pectoralis major muscle measured with 2D ultrasound
1 week
Reliability of soft tissue composition
Time Frame: 1 week
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of tissue composition (echo-intensity) measured with 2D ultrasound
1 week
Reliability of soft tissue elasticity (m/sec)
Time Frame: 1 week
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of soft tissue elasticity (m/sec) of the pectoralis major muscle and breast measured with shear-wave elastography
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validity of soft tissue elasticity
Time Frame: 1 week
Soft tissue elasticity (m/sec) measured with the shear-wave elastography will be compared with the soft tissue index (N/m) measured with the MyotonPro, skin stiffness (N) measure with the SkinFibrometer, severity of tissue toxicity after radiotherapy (0-4) with the Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme (RTOG) and degree of myofascial adhesions (0-9) measured with the MAP-BC
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 2, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 2, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2776

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Assessment of soft tissue properties

Subscribe