Multifunctional Cataract Surgery Assistive Instruments Used in Cataract Surgery

In order to better cope with complex situations of cataract surgery, we designed and improved a new set of multi-functional cataract surgery auxiliary devices, including ophthalmic surgery auxiliary hooks, eye retractor hooks and membranous cataract scissors. Their common feature is that they have the function of 2-3 traditional surgical instruments, which can be switched in operations, reducing the replacement of different surgical instruments, lowing the number of surgical instruments in and out of the incision, reducing trauma and improving surgical efficiency. The purpose of this multi-center prospective clinical study is to verify the advantages of this new group of multifunctional devices and further summarize the experience and improvement by comparing the safety and effectiveness of traditional cataract surgical instruments combined with new multifunctional cataract assisted surgical instruments and traditional cataract surgical instruments alone.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cataract is the number one cause of blindness, and the main treatment method is surgery to remove the cloudy lens and install an intraocular lens. The operation relies on ophthalmic micromanipulative instruments, but in complex cases such as abnormal lens capsule, ocular trauma, etc., the difficulty of surgery increases, so that conventional instruments are often unable to complete the operation well. In order to better cope with these complex situations, we designed and improved a new set of multi-functional cataract surgery auxiliary devices, including ophthalmic surgery auxiliary hooks, eye retractor hooks and membranous cataract scissors, which have obtained utility model patents and first-class medical device filings. Their common feature is that they have the function of 2-3 traditional surgical instruments, which can be switched intraoperatively, reduce the replacement of different surgical instruments, reduce the number of surgical instruments in and out of the incision, reduce trauma and improve surgical efficiency. The purpose of this multi-center prospective clinical study is to verify the advantages of this new group of multifunctional devices and further summarize the experience and improvement by comparing the safety and effectiveness of traditional cataract surgical instruments combined with new multifunctional cataract assisted surgical instruments and traditional cataract surgical instruments alone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310009
        • Recruiting
        • Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Clinical diagnosis of cataract Patients need to undergo cataract surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

- Active intraocular inflammation The intraocular pressure (IOP) was higher than 25 mmHg The endothelial cell count (ECC) was less than 1,200 cells/mm2 Combined with other eye diseases Combined with other serious systemic diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multi-functional instruments
Patients undergoing cataract with lens subluxation surgery with Multifunctional cataract-assisted retractor
Ophthalmic retractors can be used to lift the lens during surgery to assist in lens sucking or resection; Intraoperative injection of reagent, which has the advantage of retractable, micro-incision. Ophthalmic hooks can be used to secure support capsular bags; auxiliary cleavage; polishing capsule; Viscoelastic agent is injected as needed. The front end of the membranous cataract scissor is a capsular tearing forceps, and the capsule tearing and capsule scissors can be flexibly switched. All three instruments have the functions of two or three traditional instruments, which can be designed to reduce the number of times the instruments enter and exit the incision during surgery, improve surgical efficiency,
Other Names:
  • A set of available instruments including ophthalmic retractor, ophthalmic hook and membranous cataract scissors,
Active Comparator: Traditional instruments
Patients undergoing cataract with lens subluxation surgery with traditional capsule retractor
traditional Cataract-assisted instruments for cataract operation.Puncture knives, microscissors, microscopic forceps, nucleus hooks, lens graft forceps, are used to cut the cornea, assist in removing the cloudy lens, suturing wounds.
Other Names:
  • commonly used instruments for cataract surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful implantation rate of intraocular lens
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
implantation rate of intraocular lens with different instrument
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual function
Time Frame: 1day postoperation,1 week,1 month, 3month postoperation
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using a decimal chart Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using a decimal chart
1day postoperation,1 week,1 month, 3month postoperation
intraocular pressure
Time Frame: 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 month postoperation
intraocular pressure
1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 month postoperation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-0370

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on multifunctional instruments

Subscribe