Anticipating Decline and Providing Therapy (ADAPT)

March 26, 2026 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Anticipating Decline and Providing Therapy (ADAPT): Post-ICU Cognitive Screening Pilot and Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

This pilot feasibility study will be a randomized control trial of usual care following Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge compared to the Anticipating Decline and Providing Therapy (ADAPT) screening and support intervention. The trial aims to enroll 120 older adults (age 60 or older).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anticipating Decline and Providing Therapy (ADAPT) is a program designed to support the implementation of a routine post-ICU cognitive impairment screening and support intervention. The program includes a routine validated cognitive screen for high-risk older adults at 6 weeks and 6 months post-ICU discharge. Patients with a screening assessment that may be consistent with cognitive impairment or dementia will receive additional resources including a specialized care plan developed by the Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Prevention. The specialized care plan is adapted from a health system-based dementia care intervention and designed to support post-ICU cognitive concerns. It was adapted with input from geriatrics, intensive care, and outpatient primary care clinicians. Also conducted are semi-structured interviews with 22 older adult ICU survivors and 6 primary care physicians to elicit preferences and the intervention was further adapted based on these results.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 60 and older at time of discharge from intensive care unit
  • Minimum 72 hour Intensive Care Unit stay in an ICU at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
  • Delirium during ICU stay as determined by positive Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)-ICU score, review of clinical - documentation, or discussion with clinical team
  • Primary care provider in the Atrium Health Wake Forest system or intention to follow with Primary Care Physician in Atrium Health system
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Death during initial hospitalization and/or discharge to Hospice
  • Life-expectancy < 6 months from pre-existing illness (defined as diagnosis of metastatic cancer, cirrhosis, advanced heart failure, prior palliative care referral)
  • Acute Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Continued residence in skilled nursing facility or rehab that prevents ability to complete study telephone call at time of first cognitive screen attempt
  • Prior history of dementia in electronic health record
  • Language or communication barrier that prohibits intervention participation
  • Participant cannot identify family or caregiver contact or family/caregiver unwilling to participate
  • Subject or legally authorized representative (LAR) decline consent
  • Unstable telephone service for contact after hospital discharge
  • Primary residence outside of North Carolina

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual Care
routine clinic visits
routine clinic visits
Other Names:
  • routine clinic visits
Experimental: Anticipating Decline and Providing Therapy (ADAPT) care
The program includes a routine validated cognitive screen for high-risk older adults at 6 weeks and 6 months post-ICU discharge
routine validated cognitive screen for high-risk older adults at 6 weeks and 6 months post-ICU discharge
Other Names:
  • Post-ICU cognitive screening

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants in Cognitive Screening Intervention Arm
Time Frame: Week 6
Number of participants in intervention arm who complete cognitive screening at 6 weeks
Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Percentage of participants having mild cognitive impairment (MCI), probable dementia and the combination of either MCI or probable dementia
Time Frame: Week 28
percentage of participants adjudicated as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI), probable dementia and the combination of either MCI or probable dementia
Week 28
Change in number of Participants between those enrolled and those who were eligible but declined
Time Frame: Week 52
compare pre-specified baseline characteristics (i.e., age, sex, race, ICU length of stay) between those enrolled and those who were eligible but declined
Week 52
Number of eligible participants who complete specialized care plan development visit
Time Frame: up to week 28
Number of eligible participants who complete specialized care plan development visit
up to week 28
Change in Modified Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI) Scores
Time Frame: Week 28
the modified caregiver strain index will be assessed via telephone call to identified caregiver or care partner in both groups - a 13-question tool that measures strain related to care provision - Scoring is 2 points for each 'yes', and 1 point for each 'sometimes' response. The higher the score, the higher the level of caregiver strain - range of 13-26
Week 28
Change in the number of hospitalizations and Emergency Department visits
Time Frame: Month 12
healthcare utilization will be the number of hospitalizations and Emergency Department (ED) visits
Month 12
Change in the Number of neuropsychiatric prescriptions medications
Time Frame: Month 12
number of neuropsychiatric prescriptions medications will be measured using the electronic health record
Month 12
Change in number of new diagnoses of dementia or mild cognitive impairment
Time Frame: Month 12
new diagnosis of dementia or mild cognitive impairment will be measured using the electronic health record
Month 12
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Scores
Time Frame: Week 28
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - Response Scale - 4 item scales. Each item will be measured on a 5 point Likert scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree - The score is calculated mean. Higher scores reflect higher measure of acceptability
Week 28
Acceptability of Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Scores
Time Frame: Week 28
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - Response Scale - 4 item scales. Each item will be measured on a 5 point Likert scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree - The score is calculated mean. Higher scores reflect higher measure of appropriateness
Week 28
Acceptability of Feasibility of Intervention measure (FIM) Scores
Time Frame: Week 28
The Acceptability of Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - Response Scale - 4 item scales. Each item will be measured on a 5 point Likert scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree - The score is calculated mean. Higher scores reflect higher measure of feasibility
Week 28

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative Perception
Time Frame: Week 28
semi-structured interviews with participants for feedback about the intervention - this will not be a numerical score
Week 28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jessica Palakshappa, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Usual Care post-Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

Subscribe