Comparison Study Between PET/CT and Whole-Body Diffusion Weighted MRI in the Detection of Distant Malignancies

January 14, 2024 updated by: Hala Mohamed Ahmed, Sohag University

A Prospective Comparison Study Between 18F-FDG PET/CT and Whole-Body Diffusion Weighted MRI in the Detection of Distant Malignancies in Patients With Various Cancers

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and DWI WB-MRI in detection of distant metastasis of various cancers.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Metastasis is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer, accounting for ~90% of cancer-associated deaths.

Distant metastasis (DM) is a crucial point in the management of malignant tumors. DM is always associated with poor survival. Conclusive diagnosis of DM is crucial for improving the prognosis, reduction of the recurrence rate and hence, elevation of the 5-year survival rate.

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) allows the analysis of active tumor tissue in the whole body. So, it obtains improved sensitivity and specificity when compared to conventional imaging modalities.

18F-FDG PET/CT is a diagnostic imaging modality with good quantitative properties. It has proven its interest in diagnosing, staging, and evaluating tumor response.

Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) has been proposed as another effective whole-body approach for assessing both local invasiveness and distant metastases in patients with newly diagnosed cancers providing several advantages.

WB-MRI primarily provides structural information (revealing a detailed image of the pathology or lesion) on tumor spread; however, the absence of functional datasets has been resolved by incorporating Whole-body Diffusion Weighted Imaging (WB-DWI) into medical practice. WB-DWI shortens examination interpretation times by directing the radiologist's attention to abnormalities, which may then be investigated on anatomic sequences. It enables early detection of skeletal metastases as well as spread to other sites (liver and brain).

DW-MRI measures the Brownian motion of water molecules within intra- and extracellular spaces. This occurs in highly cellular lesions or in environments in which tissue architecture is disrupted and can be quantified by calculating the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

adult patient, having present history of malignancy and referred from the general surgery or oncology clinics as having known metastatic lesions proven by histopathology or cytology. all Patients should be eligible to go through both modalities; PET-CT and MRI.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Only patients with malignancies proven by histology and patients with metastatic lesions proven by histopathology or cytology were included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • As regard the PET/CT study, patients who have the general CT contraindications such as pregnancy, breast feeding, history of allergic reaction to the contrast medium, renal disease, etc.

    • As regard the MRI study, general contraindications including claustrophobia, MR-incompatible pacemakers and MR-incompatible heart valves.
    • Patients whose MRI sequences were incomplete, low-quality and/or had no histopathological evidence of metastatic lesions were eliminated from the study.
    • Low-quality or incomplete MRI included MRI exams with incomplete sequence(s), which is particularly common in elderly patients who are unable to tolerate the scan, or uncooperative patients who do not obey breathing instructions and motion artifacts that may impair images and lead to lower accuracy.
    • Declined consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
comparison between the efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and DWI WB-MRI in detection of distant metastasis of various cancers
Time Frame: 1 Year

comparing the value of both PET-CT and whole body MRI mainly the DWI sequence in detection of bony and soft tissue metastasis in different types of malignancy. Which? will be better in early detection.

PET-CT:

differentiation of benign from malignant lesions can be determined using (Standardized uptake value) (SUV) as malignant lesions show higher SUV than benign lesions.

Typically, a standardized uptake value (SUV) is a descriptive name of the quantity that incorporates the patient's size and the injected dose; > 2.0: considered malignancy, less than this value: considered to be benign.

DWI WB-MRI:

differentiation of benign from malignant lesions can be determined using ADC value as malignant lesions show low ADC value compared to the benign lesions.

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a descriptive name of the measure of the magnitude of diffusion (of water molecules) within tissue.

1 Year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of SUV value in PET-CT for detection of metastatic lesions in cancer patients
Time Frame: 1 Year
detection of malignancy by applying Cut-Off level SUV value in detection and differentiation of metastatic deposits.
1 Year
DWI-MRI in detection of metastatic lesions in cancer patients
Time Frame: 1 Year

detection of malignancy with applying ADC cut-off level for differentiating the malignant metastatic deposits.

qualitative interpretation: differentiation of benign from malignant lesions can be determined through presence Vs absence diffusion restriction at diffusion weighted images (DWI), as only the malignant lesions that show diffusion restriction .

quantitative interpretation: differentiation of benign from malignant lesions can be determined using ADC value as malignant lesions show low ADC value compared to the benign lesions.

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a descriptive name of the measure of the magnitude of diffusion (of water molecules) within tissue.

1 Year
MRI in detection of metastatic lesions in cancer patients
Time Frame: 1 Year

comparing each sequence of MRI in different organs including T2WI, T1WI and DWI sequences. ? Which is the best for detection and characterization of the Metastatic lesions in different bony and soft tissue in different parts of the body.

T2WI & T1WI are descriptive names of sequences in the MRI study that can be evaluated qualitatively.

DWI is a descriptive name of sequences in the MRI study that can be evaluated qualitatively and quantitively through using the ADC value which is a descriptive name of the measure of the magnitude of diffusion (of water molecules) within tissue.

1 Year
Added value PET-CT in detection of metastatic lesions in cancer patients
Time Frame: 1 Year

value of PET CT in detection of malignant metastatic deposits in bony and soft tissue lesions and the different pitfalls including the inflammatory conditions. Does the PET-CT can overcome it and how much sensitivity it has? qualitative interpretation : differentiation of benign from malignant lesions can be determined through the degree of 16F-FGD uptake as malignant lesions show avid uptake.

quantitative interpretation: differentiation of benign from malignant lesions can be determined using (Standardized uptake value) (SUV) as malignant lesions show higher SUV than benign lesions.

Typically, a standardized uptake value (SUV) is a descriptive name of the quantity that incorporates the patient's size and the injected dose, that is more than 2.0 is considered to be suggestive of malignancy, whereas lesions with SUVs less than this value are considered to be benign.

1 Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PET-CT and MRI in malignancy

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distant Metastasis

Clinical Trials on PET-CT, MRI

Subscribe