Mental Health Literacy and Academic Performance (MHLAP)

June 15, 2024 updated by: Cezar Giosan, University of Bucharest

Mental Health Literacy and Academic Performance - A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of an intervention designed to promote mental health literacy in adolescents. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Whether this intervention can have an impact on mental health
  2. Whether this intervention can have an impact on fostering academic performance, particularly in disadvantaged students (i.e., academic resilience)
  3. Whether this intervention will have differential effectiveness as a function of the delivery format (psychoeducational materials only versus blended)

Participants will receive either an online, automated intervention consisting of psychoeducational materials delivered at predetermined intervals (automated), or the same but with the addition of synchronous or asynchronous psychoeducational sessions held by a licensed psychologist (i.e., blended).

These two conditions will also be compared to a Waitlist, to test if the interventions perform better than no treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A Randomized Clinical Trial was designed, involving comparisons at three time-points (pre-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up) between: (a) Automated delivery of the intervention, (b) Blended format of the intervention, (c) Waitlist (matched control group). Participants will be randomly allocated to one of these three arms, with randomization done at the classroom level.

Appropriate methods for two-level-designs were used to determine sample size requirements for a cRCT with 4 cluster groups (i.e. classrooms) per experimental condition, 22 participants per cluster. For a linear mixed-effects model, a sample size of approximately 88 participants per experimental condition for a total sample size of 264 was sufficient to achieve 80% power to detect an effect size of Cohen's d = 0.4 at an alpha level of 0.05.

Mental health symptomatology (screening items, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), depression, anxiety, social anxiety, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), eating disorders), adverse childhood experiences, bullying, social support, mental health stigma, help-seeking, social media engagement, digital addiction, and academic performance will be assessed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

264

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bucharest, Romania, 050663
        • Recruiting
        • University of Bucharest
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in High School

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 14 or older than 18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Automated Intervention
The intervention will last for 3 months, with two psychoeducational modules delivered per month.
Participants will receive 6 psychoeducational modules design to increase mental health literacy: Module 1: The Stigma of Mental Illness, Module 2: Understanding Mental Health and Mental Illness, Module 3: Information on Specific Mental Illnesses, Module 4: Experiences of Mental Illness, Module 5: Seeking Help and Finding Support, Module 6: The Importance of Positive Mental Health.
Experimental: Blended Intervention
The intervention will last for 3 months, with two psychoeducational modules delivered per month. In addition, regular synchronous or asynchronous psychoeducational sessions conducted by a licensed psychologist will be held with the participants.
Participants will receive the same materials as the Automated Intervention, as well as the possibility to attend psychoeducational sessions held by licensed psychologists.
No Intervention: Waitlist
This group will undergo the evaluations on the same schedule like the active groups. No intervention will be done.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Academic Performance - reading
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Reading comprehension will be assessed with a standardized test for Romanian language, which were sourced from the pool of items from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS). The test will consist of 26 items, with difficulties ranging from easy to difficult. Higher scores indicate greater academic performance.
up to 3 months
Academic Performance - mathematics
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Performance in mathematics will be assessed with a standardized test, sourced from the TIMSS, a platform specializing in standardized educational assessment in Romania. The test will consist of 26 items, with difficulties ranging from easy to difficult. Higher scores indicate greater academic performance.
up to 3 months
Depressive symptomatology
Time Frame: up to 3 months
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression Scale (PHQ-A, Johnson et al., 2002) is the adolescent-adapted version of the Patient Health Questionnaire and contains ten items. Scores range from 0 to 30 and a higher score is representative of a worse outcome.
up to 3 months
Anxiety symptomatology
Time Frame: up to 3 months
The Anxiety Rating scale (Spitzer et al., 2011) consists of eight items, with scores ranging from 0 to 24 and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social anxiety symptomatology
Time Frame: up to 3 months
The Severity Measure for Social Anxiety Disorder (SMSAD 11-17) is a ten-item instrument for children and adolescents (Carlton et al., 2022), with scores ranging from 0 to 50, with higher scores being indicative of a worse outcome.
up to 3 months
Posttraumatic stress symptomatology
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Posttraumatic Stress The Post Traumatic Symptom scale (Nedelcea et al., 2022) consists of 37 items. The first part of the scale presents a series of 17 stressful situations and participants are asked to indicate whether they have been exposed to one or more of these events in their lifetime. The last 20 items refer to the individual's reaction after experiencing a stressful situation. Scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
up to 3 months
Eating Disorder symptomatology
Time Frame: up to 3 months
The NEDA Eating Disorder Screening Tool (Fitzsimmons-Craft et al., 2019) is composed of 14 items. The first 11 items address different aspects of eating behavior and/or self-image. These contain multiple response options, with participants being guided to choose the one that suits them. The last three items refer to information about height, lowest weight in the last year and current weight. Higher scores indicate higher symptomatology.
up to 3 months
Perceived social support
Time Frame: up to 3 months
The Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (Kliem et al., 2015) contains six items, measured on a five-point Likert-type scale, where 1 = Does not fit me at all and 5 = Fits me extremely well. Scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicative of a better outcome.
up to 3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Help seeking
Time Frame: up to 3 months
The Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help - Short Form (Fischer & Farina, 1995) instrument assesses attitudes towards seeking specialized psychological help. It consists of ten items and participants are asked to express the extent to which they agree with the statements. Scores range from 0 to 30 and higher scores are indicative of a better outcome.
up to 3 months
Mental health stigma
Time Frame: up to 3 months
The Peer Mental Health Stigmatization Scale (McKeague et al., 2015) assesses stigmatizing attitudes of people experiencing mental health problems. It is composed of 24 items and participants are asked to express the extent to which they agree with the items. cores range from 0 to 96, with higher scores being indicative of a better outcome.
up to 3 months
Bullying
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Bullying will assessed with the six items used in the World Mental Health Initiative. The items refer to times when someone is intentionally hurt or scared by a peer in the school setting, on the internet and in close relationships. Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicative of a worse outcome.
up to 3 months
Social media engagement
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Social Media engagement will be measured with the Social Media Engagement Questionnaire (SMEQ; Przybylski et al., 2013). The questionnaire contains 5 items measured on an 8-point Likert scale (0 = not one day; 7 = every day). Higher scores represent higher engagement with social media. Scores range from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicative of a worse outcome.
up to 3 months
Digital addiction
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Digital Addiction will be measured with the Digital Addiction Scale for Teenagers (DAST; Seema et al., 2022). This is a 10-item instrument measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from never to very often. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicative of a worse outcome.
up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cezar Giosan, PhD, University of Bucharest

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MHEALTHACAD

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health Wellness 1

Clinical Trials on Automated Intervention

Subscribe