- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06217744
Mental Health Literacy and Academic Performance (MHLAP)
Mental Health Literacy and Academic Performance - A Randomized Clinical Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of an intervention designed to promote mental health literacy in adolescents. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Whether this intervention can have an impact on mental health
- Whether this intervention can have an impact on fostering academic performance, particularly in disadvantaged students (i.e., academic resilience)
- Whether this intervention will have differential effectiveness as a function of the delivery format (psychoeducational materials only versus blended)
Participants will receive either an online, automated intervention consisting of psychoeducational materials delivered at predetermined intervals (automated), or the same but with the addition of synchronous or asynchronous psychoeducational sessions held by a licensed psychologist (i.e., blended).
These two conditions will also be compared to a Waitlist, to test if the interventions perform better than no treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A Randomized Clinical Trial was designed, involving comparisons at three time-points (pre-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up) between: (a) Automated delivery of the intervention, (b) Blended format of the intervention, (c) Waitlist (matched control group). Participants will be randomly allocated to one of these three arms, with randomization done at the classroom level.
Appropriate methods for two-level-designs were used to determine sample size requirements for a cRCT with 4 cluster groups (i.e. classrooms) per experimental condition, 22 participants per cluster. For a linear mixed-effects model, a sample size of approximately 88 participants per experimental condition for a total sample size of 264 was sufficient to achieve 80% power to detect an effect size of Cohen's d = 0.4 at an alpha level of 0.05.
Mental health symptomatology (screening items, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), depression, anxiety, social anxiety, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), eating disorders), adverse childhood experiences, bullying, social support, mental health stigma, help-seeking, social media engagement, digital addiction, and academic performance will be assessed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Cezar Giosan, PhD
- Phone Number: +1(212)4448577
- Email: giosan@outlook.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bucharest, Romania, 050663
- Recruiting
- University of Bucharest
-
Contact:
- Cezar Giosan, PhD
- Phone Number: +40730908050
- Email: giosan@outlook.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Enrolled in High School
Exclusion Criteria:
- Younger than 14 or older than 18
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Automated Intervention
The intervention will last for 3 months, with two psychoeducational modules delivered per month.
|
Participants will receive 6 psychoeducational modules design to increase mental health literacy: Module 1: The Stigma of Mental Illness, Module 2: Understanding Mental Health and Mental Illness, Module 3: Information on Specific Mental Illnesses, Module 4: Experiences of Mental Illness, Module 5: Seeking Help and Finding Support, Module 6: The Importance of Positive Mental Health.
|
|
Experimental: Blended Intervention
The intervention will last for 3 months, with two psychoeducational modules delivered per month.
In addition, regular synchronous or asynchronous psychoeducational sessions conducted by a licensed psychologist will be held with the participants.
|
Participants will receive the same materials as the Automated Intervention, as well as the possibility to attend psychoeducational sessions held by licensed psychologists.
|
|
No Intervention: Waitlist
This group will undergo the evaluations on the same schedule like the active groups.
No intervention will be done.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Academic Performance - reading
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
Reading comprehension will be assessed with a standardized test for Romanian language, which were sourced from the pool of items from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS).
The test will consist of 26 items, with difficulties ranging from easy to difficult.
Higher scores indicate greater academic performance.
|
up to 3 months
|
|
Academic Performance - mathematics
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
Performance in mathematics will be assessed with a standardized test, sourced from the TIMSS, a platform specializing in standardized educational assessment in Romania.
The test will consist of 26 items, with difficulties ranging from easy to difficult.
Higher scores indicate greater academic performance.
|
up to 3 months
|
|
Depressive symptomatology
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression Scale (PHQ-A, Johnson et al., 2002) is the adolescent-adapted version of the Patient Health Questionnaire and contains ten items.
Scores range from 0 to 30 and a higher score is representative of a worse outcome.
|
up to 3 months
|
|
Anxiety symptomatology
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
The Anxiety Rating scale (Spitzer et al., 2011) consists of eight items, with scores ranging from 0 to 24 and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
up to 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Social anxiety symptomatology
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
The Severity Measure for Social Anxiety Disorder (SMSAD 11-17) is a ten-item instrument for children and adolescents (Carlton et al., 2022), with scores ranging from 0 to 50, with higher scores being indicative of a worse outcome.
|
up to 3 months
|
|
Posttraumatic stress symptomatology
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
Posttraumatic Stress The Post Traumatic Symptom scale (Nedelcea et al., 2022) consists of 37 items.
The first part of the scale presents a series of 17 stressful situations and participants are asked to indicate whether they have been exposed to one or more of these events in their lifetime.
The last 20 items refer to the individual's reaction after experiencing a stressful situation.
Scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
|
up to 3 months
|
|
Eating Disorder symptomatology
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
The NEDA Eating Disorder Screening Tool (Fitzsimmons-Craft et al., 2019) is composed of 14 items.
The first 11 items address different aspects of eating behavior and/or self-image.
These contain multiple response options, with participants being guided to choose the one that suits them.
The last three items refer to information about height, lowest weight in the last year and current weight.
Higher scores indicate higher symptomatology.
|
up to 3 months
|
|
Perceived social support
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
The Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (Kliem et al., 2015) contains six items, measured on a five-point Likert-type scale, where 1 = Does not fit me at all and 5 = Fits me extremely well.
Scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicative of a better outcome.
|
up to 3 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Help seeking
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
The Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help - Short Form (Fischer & Farina, 1995) instrument assesses attitudes towards seeking specialized psychological help.
It consists of ten items and participants are asked to express the extent to which they agree with the statements.
Scores range from 0 to 30 and higher scores are indicative of a better outcome.
|
up to 3 months
|
|
Mental health stigma
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
The Peer Mental Health Stigmatization Scale (McKeague et al., 2015) assesses stigmatizing attitudes of people experiencing mental health problems.
It is composed of 24 items and participants are asked to express the extent to which they agree with the items.
cores range from 0 to 96, with higher scores being indicative of a better outcome.
|
up to 3 months
|
|
Bullying
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
Bullying will assessed with the six items used in the World Mental Health Initiative.
The items refer to times when someone is intentionally hurt or scared by a peer in the school setting, on the internet and in close relationships.
Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicative of a worse outcome.
|
up to 3 months
|
|
Social media engagement
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
Social Media engagement will be measured with the Social Media Engagement Questionnaire (SMEQ; Przybylski et al., 2013).
The questionnaire contains 5 items measured on an 8-point Likert scale (0 = not one day; 7 = every day).
Higher scores represent higher engagement with social media.
Scores range from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicative of a worse outcome.
|
up to 3 months
|
|
Digital addiction
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
Digital Addiction will be measured with the Digital Addiction Scale for Teenagers (DAST; Seema et al., 2022).
This is a 10-item instrument measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from never to very often.
Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicative of a worse outcome.
|
up to 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Cezar Giosan, PhD, University of Bucharest
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- MHEALTHACAD
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mental Health Wellness 1
-
Indiana UniversityCommunity Health Network; Boys & Girls Clubs of IndianapolisCompletedMental Health Wellness 1 | Child Behavior | Adolescent Behavior | Mental Health Wellness 2United States
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterNot yet recruitingMental Health Wellness 1 | Wellness, PsychologicalUnited States
-
King's College LondonCompletedMental Health Wellness 1 | Mental Health IssueUnited Kingdom
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaGreen International UniversityNot yet recruitingMental Health Wellness 1
-
Northern Arizona UniversityUniversity of Colorado, DenverRecruiting
-
The New SchoolColumbia University; Universidad del Norte; HIASRecruitingMental Health Wellness 1Colombia
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompletedMental Health Wellness 1United States
-
University of BathKing's College London; University of Pennsylvania; Newcastle University; University... and other collaboratorsCompletedMental Health Wellness 1United Kingdom
-
The University of Hong KongThe Boys' and Girls' Clubs Association of Hong KongCompleted
-
University of South WalesMIND CymruTerminated
Clinical Trials on Automated Intervention
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompleted
-
M. Kit Delgado, MDCompletedAppointment RemindersUnited States
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNot yet recruitingReferral | Cardiac Rehab | LINE Robot Intervention
-
University Hospital Carl Gustav CarusCompleted
-
University of California, San FranciscoAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); San Francisco Health Plan...Completed
-
The University of Hong KongCompletedStroke | Hypertension | Lifestyle ModificationsHong Kong
-
Columbia UniversityNot yet recruitingGlaucoma | Hypertension | Elevated Blood Pressure | Glaucoma, SuspectUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalUnknownDepression | Hypertension | Diabetes | InsomniaUnited States
-
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)The Commonwealth Fund; California HealthCare FoundationCompleted
-
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityRecruiting