Live-streaming Vs Face-to-face Teaching Method Effectiveness in Training Surgical Clerkship (LS vs FTF)

November 6, 2024 updated by: Freda Halim, Pelita Harapan University

Objective Assessment of Live-streaming Vs Face-to-face Teaching Method Effectiveness in Training Simple Wound Suturing Skill to Surgical Clerkship

The goal of this observational study is to assess objectively whether teaching for simple wound sutures via Live-Streaming (LS) using Go-pro® has the same effectiveness as the traditional Face-to-face (FTF) teaching. The main question it aims to answer is whether training simple wound suturing skills to surgical clerkships via LS has the same effectiveness as the FTF training.

After initially doing pre-test, participants will be randomized into two groups: LS and FTF. After teaching exposure, the participants will be given 1 week period of self-training to master the skill (as such procedural skills require a period of self training before we examine the effect of teaching exposure). Afterwards, they underwent post-test again with the previously same examiner, using the same OSCE rubric to avoid bias. Researchers will compare if the LS and FTF groups to see if training simple wound suturing skills to surgical clerkships via LS has the same effectiveness as the FTF training.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Banten
      • Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia, 15811
        • Pelita Harapan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Surgery clerkships
  • Willing to participate voluntarily and give consent to the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who drop out between 1 week period of pre-test and post-test
  • Participants not willing to be involved in the teaching exposure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Face-to-face
Face-to-face teaching method
FTF group are participants who will learn simple sutures physically present with the instructor in the same room.
Experimental: Live-streaming
Live-streaming teaching method
One general surgeon (FH) will teach the participants how to do simple sutures on a mannequin, starting by explaining, then doing a live-demo step-by-step of simple wound suturing. The instructor uses a GoPro Hero 8 device on her head which is connected to the internet and produced live-streaming video, which will then be watched by LS group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-test Scores
Time Frame: 1 week after teaching
Post-test Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) scores Value ranges from 0 to 60. Higher score means better outcome, and vice versa.
1 week after teaching

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Differences of Pre-test and Post-test (Delta)
Time Frame: 1 week after teaching
Numerical differences of Pre- and Post-Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) scores (Delta) Value ranges from -60 to 60. Higher numerical difference means better outcome, and vice versa.
1 week after teaching

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Freda Halim, Dr, dr, SpB, Pelita Harapan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 011/K-LKJ/ETIK/I/2023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will be made publicly available as part of an open access dataset.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available shortly after the study is finished, and will be available publicly for as long as needed.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Open

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Teaching Method

Clinical Trials on Face-to-face

Subscribe