- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06225609
No Stoma VS Ghost Stoma in Patients Undergoing Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
January 17, 2024 updated by: fan li
Ghost Ileostomy Group Versus no Stoma Group in Patients Undergoing Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study
This study aimed at comparing the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), readmission rates, postoperative hospitalization days, duration of bearing the stoma (months), hospitalization costs, the number of hospitalizations with ghost ileostomy group versus no ileostomy group after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
So far, there are no relevant reports on ghost ileostomy among the Asian population, and all studies are small sample studies.In the past decades, with the advent of circular stapling devices, many middle and low rectal cancers have chosen new sphincter-saving procedures (such as ISR and Ta TME).
Nevertheless, when the incidence rate of AL remains high, is diverting ileostomy applicable?
Is ghost ileostomy applicable to rectal cancer in the context of new surgical procedures such as pelvic floor reconstruction, perineal drainage, anastomotic reinforcement and robotic surgery?
Is this delayed stoma safe and feasible with the increase of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy?
Therefore, our study proposes to summarize the review of the complications of GI and no stoma to explore the safety and effectiveness of GI in clinical practice.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
500
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pathologically confirmed rectal cancer.
- age ≥18 years and ≤80 years.
- intraoperative ghost ileostomy or no stoma was performed.
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA score >3.
- Patients with coexisting complete intestinal obstruction.
- History of long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs or glucocorticoids.
- Combined severe cardiac disease: with congestive heart failure or NYHA cardiac function ≥ grade 2.
- Patients with a history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery surgery within 6 months before the procedure.
- chronic renal failure (requiring dialysis or glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min).
Intraoperative combined multi-organ resection.
- Combined cirrhosis of the liver.
- Intraoperative findings of incomplete anastomosis and positive insufflation test.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ghost ileostomy
Laparoscopic or robotic surgery with ghost ileostomy
|
Laparoscopic or robotic surgery with ghost ileostomy
|
|
Active Comparator: No ileostomy
Laparoscopic or robotic surgery with no ileostomy
|
Laparoscopic or robotic surgery with no ileostomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Calculation postoperative of the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) for each patient
Time Frame: An average of 1 year from the date of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer until the date of when the patient's condition is stabilized without complications
|
The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)summarises all postoperative complications based on the established Clavien-Dindo classification (ranging from mild complications not leading to a deviation from the normal clinical course (grade I) up to postoperative death (grade V)) at an individual patient level according to their grade of severity.
|
An average of 1 year from the date of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer until the date of when the patient's condition is stabilized without complications
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative hospitalization days
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
If the ghost ileostomy group required bed rest or a second surgery for ileostomy due to complications or no stoma group required a second surgery due to complications, the number of days of hospitalization due to complications and/or reoperation since total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer was recorded.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Readmission rates
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Patients in the ghost ileostomy and no stoma groups who did not have a second surgery due to complications recorded the number of hospitalizations after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
If the ghost ileostomy and no stoma groups required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications, record the number of hospitalizations due to complications and/or reoperation since the data of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
The number of hospitalizations
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Patients in the ghost ileostomy and no stoma groups who did not have a second surgery due to complications recorded the number of hospitalizations after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
If the ghost ileostomy and no stoma groups required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications, record the number of hospitalizations due to complications and/or reoperation since the data of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
First hospitalization costs
Time Frame: During hospitalization,approximately 7 days
|
Patient hospitalization costs for total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer.
|
During hospitalization,approximately 7 days
|
|
Total hospitalization costs
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Patients in the ghost ileostomy and no stoma groups who did not have a second surgery due to complications recorded the costs total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer, if the ghost ileostomy and no stoma groups required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications and all patients in the diverting ileostomy group required reoperation for stoma reversal, record the costs due to complications and reoperation since the data of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The number of patients who required secondary abdominal surgery under general anesthesia due to complications
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Patient undergoes second abdominal surgery for complications after first surgery
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Whether patients undergo terminal ostomy after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Hartmann's procedure or for example, abdominoperineal extirpation
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
The number of participants with ghost ileostomy converted to diverting ileostomy
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
The ghost stoma required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Ghost ileostomy remove time
Time Frame: During hospitalization,approximately 7 days
|
Duration of days from the date of total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer to ghost stoma removed.
|
During hospitalization,approximately 7 days
|
|
The number of patients with complications after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Abdominal abscess,Anastomotic bleeding,Pelvic infection,Surgical incision infection, Peritonitis,Interventional drainage ,ileostomy wounds/abscesses/edema/dermatitis/ ulcers,Parastomal hernia ,Stoma prolapse,Anastomotic separation/poor healing, Anastomotic stenosis,Anastomotic leakage,Bowel obstruction,Anastomotic bowel necrosis ,Wound dehiscence / bleeding / sinus tract / abscess/fat liquefaction,Acute kidney injury ,Dehydration/output >1500 mL/day,Intestinal fistula,Incisional hernia .
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lee L, de Lacy B, Gomez Ruiz M, Liberman AS, Albert MR, Monson JRT, Lacy A, Kim SH, Atallah SB. A Multicenter Matched Comparison of Transanal and Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Low-rectal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):1110-1116. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002862.
- Zhao S, Zhang L, Gao F, Wu M, Zheng J, Bai L, Li F, Liu B, Pan Z, Liu J, Du K, Zhou X, Li C, Zhang A, Pu Z, Li Y, Feng B, Tong W. Transanal Drainage Tube Use for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1151-1158. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4568.
- Miccini M, Amore Bonapasta S, Gregori M, Barillari P, Tocchi A. Ghost ileostomy: real and potential advantages. Am J Surg. 2010 Oct;200(4):e55-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.017.
- Roodbeen SX, Penna M, Mackenzie H, Kusters M, Slater A, Jones OM, Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Cunningham C, Hompes R. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2459-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
- Mori L, Vita M, Razzetta F, Meinero P, D'Ambrosio G. Ghost ileostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: is it worthwhile? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jan;56(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182716ca1.
- Palumbo P, Usai S, Pansa A, Lucchese S, Caronna R, Bona S. Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Surgery: Role of the Ghost Ileostomy. Anticancer Res. 2019 Jun;39(6):2975-2983. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13429.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
March 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 17, 2024
First Posted (Estimated)
January 26, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
January 26, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 17, 2024
Last Verified
January 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Ghost 002
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rectal Neoplasms
-
Jagiellonian UniversityNot yet recruitingRectal Cancer | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Rectal Adenoma | Recurrent Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Rectal Neuroendocrine NeoplasmPoland
-
University of EdinburghNHS LothianNot yet recruitingRectal Cancer | Bowel Cancer | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Polyp Rectal | Rectal AdenomaUnited Kingdom
-
SafeHeal IncTerminatedSafeHeal Colovac Colorectal Anastomosis Protection Device Evaluation (SAFE-2) Pivotal Study (SAFE-2)Colorectal Cancer | Rectal Cancer | Rectal Tumor | Rectal/AnalUnited States, France, Belgium
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterNovartis Pharmaceuticals; National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkCompletedStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Recurrent Rectal CancerUnited States
-
Colospan Ltd.RecruitingRectal Cancer | Rectal Tumor | Rectal/AnalUnited States, Israel, Italy
-
Sahlgrenska University HospitalGöteborg UniversityNot yet recruitingRectal Cancer | Rectal Cancer Patients | Rectal Cancer Surgery | Rectal Cancer, RadiotherapySweden
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Rectal AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
University of California, DavisNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruitingRectal Cancer | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Early-stage Rectal CancerUnited States
-
Turkish Society of Colon and Rectal SurgeryBaskent University; Dokuz Eylul University; Halic University; Acibadem Kent Hospital and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingRectal Cancer Stage II | Rectal Cancer Stage III | Mid-Rectal CancerTurkey
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health and Science University; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Active, not recruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
Clinical Trials on Ghost ileostomy
-
University of Roma La SapienzaCompletedColo-rectal Anastomosis Dehiscence
-
Evangelisches Klinikum Köln Weyertal gGmbHUniversity of CologneCompletedColorectal SurgeryGermany
-
University Hospital, AngersUnknownEnterocolitis, Necrotizing | Intestinal Obstruction | Gastroschisis | Hirschsprung DiseaseFrance
-
Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery...Not yet recruiting
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedUlcerative Colitis | Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityCompletedRectal Neoplasms | Low Anterior ResectionChina
-
Northern Jiangsu People's HospitalCompletedIleostomy | Ileostomies | Loop IleostomiesChina
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityUnknownRectal NeoplasmsChina
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
University Hospital Inselspital, BerneTerminated