DDEP for Lifestyle Modification in Chronic Kidney Disease

April 25, 2025 updated by: Miaofen Yen, National Cheng Kung University

A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial Evaluating the Implementation of Digital Dyadic Empowerment Program (DDEP) on Lifestyle Modification for Chronic Kidney Disease Management

This is a randomized controlled feasibility trial conducted on patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and their significant other

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The trial will be conducted on 60 dyads, each comprising a CKD patient and a significant other, who will be randomly assigned into two groups. The intervention group will receive the Digital Dyadic Empowerment Program (DDEP) while the control group will receive routine education and care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tainan City, Taiwan, 70101
        • National Cheng Kung University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient has a diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease for at least six months;
  2. The patient can identify a helpful significant other and both parties are willing to participate;
  3. The patient can communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The significant other is a healthcare provider;
  2. The patient or the significant other has a mental illness diagnosis;
  3. The patient is currently receiving renal replacement therapies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital Dyadic Empowerment
The intervention group (Digital Dyadic Empowerment) will utilize LINE, a prominent instant messaging App in Taiwan, to assist in lifestyle modification, along with support from the significant other.

The Digital Dyadic Empowerment Intervention utilizes LINE, a prominent instant messaging App in Taiwan, integrated with an extended application to deliver comprehensive lifestyle modification support to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) dyads. Key features of this intervention include:

  1. Access to CKD Health Education Information;
  2. Supportive Information for Significant Others;
  3. Physiological Values Logging for Self-Monitoring;
  4. Reminders for Clinical Appointments and Daily Self-Management Tasks;
  5. Kidney Health Diary for Lifestyle Modification Progress Tracking;
  6. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and Consultation with Healthcare Providers.

This intervention aims to enhance the overall well-being of CKD dyads by promoting education, self-monitoring, adherence to appointments, and efficient communication with healthcare providers.

Other Names:
  • LINE Official Account - Kidney Lifestyle
No Intervention: Control group
The control group receives routine education and care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in eGFR at 3 Months (Patient-specific)
Time Frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
For each patient, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) by the IDMS-MDRD Equation at 3 months was obtained through the patient's biochemical test reports. Higher eGFR numbers generally indicate better kidney functions.
Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in CKD Stage at 3 Months (Patient-specific)
Time Frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
For each patient, the change from Baseline in CKD stage at 3 months was obtained by comparing the CKD stage at baseline and at follow-up, converted into the following three categories: (1) recover (e.g., from Stage 3a [at baseline] to Stage 2 [at follow-up]); (2) stable (e.g., remaining Stage 3a at both baseline and follow-up); and (3) progress (e.g., from Stage 3a [at baseline] to Stage 3b [at follow-up]).
Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in Health Promoting Lifestyle at 3 Months (Patient-specific)
Time Frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
For each patient, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in patient's Health Promoting Lifestyle at 3 months was assessed using the Chinese version of the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II (HPLP-II), a validated scale with 52 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The total scores range from 52 to 208, with higher scores indicate better health-promoting behavior.
Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life at 3 Months
Time Frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
For each participant, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in Quality of Life at 3 months was assessed using the first item of the Taiwanese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF). The item was rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in TTM Stage at 3 Months
Time Frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
For each dyad, change from Baseline in TTM stage at 3 months was obtained by comparing the TTM stage of change at baseline and at follow-up, converted into the following three categories: (1) regress (e.g., from Preparation [at baseline] to Contemplation [at follow-up]); (2) maintain (e.g., remaining Action at both baseline and follow-up); and (3) advance (e.g., from Action [at baseline] to Maintanece [at follow-up]).
Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Adherence to Health Behaviors at 3 Months (Patient-specific)
Time Frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
For each patient, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in patient's adherence to healthy behaviors was measured using the Adherence to Healthy Behaviors Scale (AHBS). The scale includes 13 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate better adherence.
Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in Helping Relationships From Significant Others at 3 Months (Patient-specific)
Time Frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
For each patient, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in patient's Helping Relationships from Significant Others at 3 months was assessed using the Chinese version of the Helping Relationships from Significant Others Scale (HRSO).The scale consists of 15 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 15 to 105. Higher scores indicate better support from the significant other.
Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in Dyadic Adjustment at 3 Months
Time Frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
For each participant, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in Dyadic Adjustment at 3 months was assessed using the 7-item Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS-7). The first six items are rated on a 6-point scale, while the seventh item is rated on a 7-point scale. The total scores range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating better relationship quality.
Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Miaofen Yen, PhD, National Cheng Kung University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 29, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Diseases

Clinical Trials on Digital Dyadic Empowerment

Subscribe