Improving Congenital Heart Disease Care (EmpowerMyCH)

January 21, 2026 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Improving Care for Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

The theory-informed digital health intervention, called as "Empower My Congenital Health (EmpowerMyCH)" aims to activate and engage ACHD patients in building confidence toward navigating the adult healthcare system. This tool is built after incorporating the theories of behavior change, gathering inputs from target patients in all stages of its design and implementation. The key features of the tool include a digital medical passport, updated congenital information, community support, and patient stories and advice. The investigators aim to test the acceptability, feasibility, efficacy, and effectiveness of the intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of this clinical trial study is to learn whether a digital multi-component intervention would increase the knowledge, self-efficacy, self-advocacy, and patient engagement skills of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) to confidently navigate the health care system and have timely recommended specialist visits.

The multicomponent intervention contains features such as a digital medical passport, updated health-related specific information, opportunities to engage with CHD community, peer-support, doctor visit reminders, etc. The intervention components are designed with inputs from the patients and the CHD community and have the potential to be adapted on an ongoing basis depending on the needs of the patients.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Does the digital multi-component CHD patient engagement intervention enhance the patient engagement skills and lead to timely specialist visit?

Participants will be recruited from the clinics, through word of mouth, social media, and others. Participants can use the website link or a QR code to sign an electronic consent form to be eligible to participate. Once consented, the participants will receive surveys to collect baseline and health status information as well as intervention components at regular intervals. The study will be available for participants to join on the web or mobile, depending on their preferences.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94117
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have congenital heart disease
  • 18 years or older
  • can sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • developmentally delayed
  • unable to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
This is a digital (web and mobile-based) multicomponent patient engagement behavioral intervention. The intervention components include digital medical passport, health-specific updated information, credible resources, connections with the community, peer- and expert support and guidance, among others
The intervention has features such as a digital medical passport, updated health-related information, community support and patient/peer stories and advice

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: 6-12 months
Number of patients recruited out of all the eligible patient approached for recruitment
6-12 months
Satisfaction with the intervention components
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Scores on client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8) survey. Scores are summed across items once. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.
0, 6 and 12 months
Acceptability of the intervention components
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months

Rates of app downloads. The investigators will download app data monthly to evaluate the frequency and duration of the use of various intervention components.

The investigators will recruit 10 participants for focused group discussions on acceptability of the app.

0, 6 and 12 months
Feasibility of the intervention
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Ability to download the app or any technical difficulties with the app or its features.
0, 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient activation measure (PAM)
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12 months
The Patient Activation Measure® is a 13-item survey that assesses an individual's knowledge, skills and confidence integral to managing one's own health and healthcare. PAM generates a score along an empirical, interval-level scale from 0-100 that correlates to one of four levels of patient activation. PAM Levels 1 and 2 indicate lower patient activation, while PAM Levels 3 and 4 indicate higher patient activation.
0, 6, 12 months
Gothenburg Empowerment Scale (GES)
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12 months

Each question is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. A higher total score indicates a higher level of empowerment.

The GES is a validated and reliable measure of patient empowerment in adults with CHD. It can be used to assess empowerment levels over time, to identify areas where empowerment can be improved, and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to promote empowerment.

0, 6, 12 months
Timely specialist visit
Time Frame: 24 - 36 months
Proportion with scheduled or completed ACHD specialist visits.
24 - 36 months
Euro-Quality of Life
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, and 24 months
The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. Higher score indicates worse quality of life
0, 6, 12, and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anushree Agarwal, MBBS, MAS, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Digital patient empowerment intervention

Subscribe