Long-term Home-based Exercise for Patients With COPD: the COPDtoParis Project (COPDtoParis)

December 2, 2024 updated by: Anna Lei Stoustrup, Aalborg University Hospital

A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial on the Effects of Long-term Home-based Exercise for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Recent Exacerbation: the COPDtoParis Project

This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to investigate the effect of long-term, interactive home-based cycle-exercise on patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) after a COPD exacerbation requiring hospitalisation. The investigators aim to investigate if patients can maintain or improve the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in terms of walking distance, intensity of COPD symptoms, health related quality of life and Quality Adjusted Life-Years.

Participants will cycle on a pedal-exerciser in the comfort of staying in the participants' own home, whilst getting visual feedback from the 4Mvideo app. The 4Mvideo technology is a Danish designed software system, where users can cycle forward a recording of a cyclist by treading on a pedal-exerciser, thereby getting some of the experience of a real-life cycling trip at home.

The investigators will compare the clinical outcomes and daily activity levels with that of a control group consisting of COPD patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a higher risk of experiencing disability, and even though participating in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) are efficient for regaining strength, function and relieving symptoms, effects prove difficult to maintain. Furthermore, physical attendance to outpatient PR is challenging for COPD patients, many of whom are bound to their home, due to said disability and symptoms. Even in patients who follow through with the PR programme, adherence to exercise after is a major challenge.

The investigators hypothesise that an intervention group of COPD-patients, who will receive home-based cycle exercise will maintain or even improve effects on physical fitness from PR, in terms of walking distance, daily activity levels (DAL), exercise tolerance, disease prevention and health related quality of life (HRQoL).

Furthermore, the investigators hypothesise that the participants express improved motivation in terms of adhering to exercise, when participating in home-based, interactive group cycle exercise.

It is expected to measure changes in DAL, lung function, levels of dyspnoea, exercise tolerance, walking distance, mobility, COPD symptoms, activity of daily living (ADL) related performance and HRQoL of the participants, along with assessing disease prevention. Data is compared intrapersonal and in-between groups to identify differences in outcomes at an individual level, and between intervention- and control group. Furthermore, the investigators expect to uncover identifiable in-depth insights into the values and beliefs towards exercising amongst participants.

40 participants are recruited amongst COPD patients that live in Aalborg Municipality and are admitted at Aalborg University Hospital, hospitalised due to acute exacerbation of COPD. After being discharged participants are referred to rehabilitation, for most in their own home. After rehabilitation participants are randomized into either intervention group who will exercise on exercise bikes connected with tablets in their own home. The control group will receive usual care, which consists of offers of exercising in their own home according to a programme or participating in exercise at a facility center.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Ulla M Weinreich, PhD
  • Phone Number: +45 30687526
  • Email: ulw@rn.dk

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • Aalborg University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Ulla M Weinreich, PhD, MD
          • Phone Number: 30687526
          • Email: ulw@rn.dk

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults at age > 18 years old
  • Hospital admission with COPD exacerbation with pre-existing COPD diagnosis
  • Citizens of Aalborg Municipality
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Accepting of referral to rehabilitation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Terminal illness
  • Unstable heart disease, i.e., ischemic heart disease, cardiac rhythm disorders
  • Other conditions preventing participating in cycle exercise, e.g., amputation, regimens or earlier or upcoming surgeries preventing seated position, blindness
  • Inability to understand basic Danish oral and written information or giving informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Home-based, longterm cycle-exercise
One year home-based cycle exercise on a exercise bike connected to a video app from where participants can cycle push videos forward when cycling.
Patients will cycle in their own home using a pedal exerciser connected to the 4M-video app
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Standard of Care; exercise at fitness center, home-based exercise according to programme, self-initiated exercise
Exercise at Fitness Center, home based exercise according to a programme

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Five-repetition sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
The five-repetition sit-to-stand test is a test of lower limb function that measures the fastest time taken to stand five times from a chair with arms folded
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Five-repetition sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: Changes from baseline lower limb function at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
The five-repetition sit-to-stand test is a test of lower limb function that measures the fastest time taken to stand five times from a chair with arms folded
Changes from baseline lower limb function at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Five-repetition sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: Changes from baseline lower limb function at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
The five-repetition sit-to-stand test is a test of lower limb function that measures the fastest time taken to stand five times from a chair with arms folded
Changes from baseline lower limb function at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Five-repetition sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: Changes from baseline lower limb function at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
The five-repetition sit-to-stand test is a test of lower limb function that measures the fastest time taken to stand five times from a chair with arms folded
Changes from baseline lower limb function at follow-up are assessed at 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily Activity Levels
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Triaxial leg-mounted sensor that assesses time spent standing, walking, running, supine, cycling and sleeping/sedentary continuously throughout the day during post-hospitalisation rehabilitation for 6 weeks.
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Daily Activity Levels
Time Frame: Changes from baseline activity during rehabilitation at follow-up are assessed 12 months
Triaxial leg-mounted sensor that assesses time spent standing, walking, running, supine, cycling and sleeping/sedentary continuously throughout the day during post-hospitalisation rehabilitation for 6 weeks
Changes from baseline activity during rehabilitation at follow-up are assessed 12 months
Lung function Test (FEV1)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Forced expiratory volume in the first second in a spirometry
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Lung function Test (FEV1)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline lung function at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Forced expiratory volume in the first second in a spirometry
Changes from baseline lung function at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Lung function Test (FEV1)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline lung function at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Forced expiratory volume in the first second in a spirometry
Changes from baseline lung function at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Lung function Test (FEV1)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline lung function at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Forced expiratory volume in the first second in a spirometry
Changes from baseline lung function at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Level of Dyspnea with the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (mMRC)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
A scale from 0-4 is used to assess the degree of functional disability due to dyspnoea. Higher score indicate higher degree of dyspnea
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Level of Dyspnea with the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (mMRC)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline and at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
A scale from 0-4 is used to assess the degree of functional disability due to dyspnoea. Higher score indicate higher degree of dyspnea
Changes from baseline and at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Level of Dyspnea with the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (mMRC)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline and at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
A scale from 0-4 is used to assess the degree of functional disability due to dyspnoea. Higher score indicate higher degree of dyspnea
Changes from baseline and at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Level of Dyspnea with the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (mMRC)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline and at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
A scale from 0-4 is used to assess the degree of functional disability due to dyspnoea. Higher score indicate higher degree of dyspnea
Changes from baseline and at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Health Related Quality of Life with St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
The 2 part, 50 item questionnaire with scores from 0-100 is used to assess health impairment related to symptoms, activity, impacts, and total in patients with asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Health Related Quality of Life with St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline health related quality of life at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
The 2 part, 50 item questionnaire with scores from 0-100 is used to assess health impairment related to symptoms, activity, impacts, and total in patients with asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.
Changes from baseline health related quality of life at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Health Related Quality of Life with St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline health related quality of life at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
The 2 part, 50 item questionnaire with scores from 0-100 is used to assess health impairment related to symptoms, activity, impacts, and total in patients with asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.
Changes from baseline health related quality of life at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Health Related Quality of Life with St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline health related quality of life at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
The 2 part, 50 item questionnaire with scores from 0-100 is used to assess health impairment related to symptoms, activity, impacts, and total in patients with asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.
Changes from baseline health related quality of life at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Life-Space Assessment (LSA)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Measure of performance on a range of tasks, ie. balance (score range = 0-16) and gait (score range = 0-12). Balance and gait scores are summed to produce a total score (range = 0-28) with higher scores indicate a higher degree of mobility.
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Life-Space Assessment (LSA)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Measure of performance on a range of tasks, ie. balance (score range = 0-16) and gait (score range = 0-12). Balance and gait scores are summed to produce a total score (range = 0-28) with higher scores indicate a higher degree of mobility.
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Life-Space Assessment (LSA)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Measure of performance on a range of tasks, ie. balance (score range = 0-16) and gait (score range = 0-12). Balance and gait scores are summed to produce a total score (range = 0-28) with higher scores indicate a higher degree of mobility.
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Life-Space Assessment (LSA)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Measure of performance on a range of tasks, ie. balance (score range = 0-16) and gait (score range = 0-12). Balance and gait scores are summed to produce a total score (range = 0-28) with higher scores indicate a higher degree of mobility.
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Measurement of the impact of COPD on a person's life, and how this changes over time. Scale ranging from 5-30 where a higher score indicates a higher impact of COPD.
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline COPD impact at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Measurement of the impact of COPD on a person's life, and how this changes over time. Scale ranging from 5-30 where a higher score indicates a higher impact of COPD.
Changes from baseline COPD impact at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline COPD impact at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Measurement of the impact of COPD on a person's life, and how this changes over time. Scale ranging from 5-30 where a higher score indicates a higher impact of COPD.
Changes from baseline COPD impact at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline COPD impact at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Measurement of the impact of COPD on a person's life, and how this changes over time. Scale ranging from 5-30 where a higher score indicates a higher impact of COPD.
Changes from baseline COPD impact at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Assessing multidimensional frailty among community-dwelling older people. Scale ranges from 0-15, with a score ranging from 0 to 8 for physical frailty, 0 to 4 for psychological frailty and 0 to 4 for social frailty. Higher scores refer to greater frailty, as older persons with a total TFI score ≥5 are considered to be frail.
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Assessing multidimensional frailty among community-dwelling older people. Scale ranges from 0-15, with a score ranging from 0 to 8 for physical frailty, 0 to 4 for psychological frailty and 0 to 4 for social frailty. Higher scores refer to greater frailty, as older persons with a total TFI score ≥5 are considered to be frail.
Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Assessing multidimensional frailty among community-dwelling older people. Scale ranges from 0-15, with a score ranging from 0 to 8 for physical frailty, 0 to 4 for psychological frailty and 0 to 4 for social frailty. Higher scores refer to greater frailty, as older persons with a total TFI score ≥5 are considered to be frail.
Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Assessing multidimensional frailty among community-dwelling older people. Scale ranges from 0-15, with a score ranging from 0 to 8 for physical frailty, 0 to 4 for psychological frailty and 0 to 4 for social frailty. Higher scores refer to greater frailty, as older persons with a total TFI score ≥5 are considered to be frail.
Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Assessment of the overall level of fitness or frailty of an older adult. Scale ranges from 1-9 where a higher score indicates a higher degree of frailty.
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Assessment of the overall level of fitness or frailty of an older adult. Scale ranges from 1-9 where a higher score indicates a higher degree of frailty.
Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Assessment of the overall level of fitness or frailty of an older adult. Scale ranges from 1-9 where a higher score indicates a higher degree of frailty.
Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Assessment of the overall level of fitness or frailty of an older adult. Scale ranges from 1-9 where a higher score indicates a higher degree of frailty.
Changes from baseline frailty at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Qualitative outcome measure to assess a patients self-perception of performance in everyday living
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline performance at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Qualitative outcome measure to assess a patients self-perception of performance in everyday living
Changes from baseline performance at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline performance at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Qualitative outcome measure to assess a patients self-perception of performance in everyday living
Changes from baseline performance at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline performance at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Qualitative outcome measure to assess a patients self-perception of performance in everyday living
Changes from baseline performance at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Six Minutes Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
A sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Six Minutes Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 6 weeks
Six Minutes Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Six Minutes Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline and at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.
Changes from baseline and at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Measurement of balance, lower extremity strength, and functional capacity in older adults (>65 years of age). The test includes three different domains (walking, sit-to-stand and balance) to assess functional mobility.
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 6 weeks
Measurement of balance, lower extremity strength, and functional capacity in older adults (>65 years of age). The test includes three different domains (walking, sit-to-stand and balance) to assess functional mobility.
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 6 weeks
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Measurement of balance, lower extremity strength, and functional capacity in older adults (>65 years of age). The test includes three different domains (walking, sit-to-stand and balance) to assess functional mobility.
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 6 months
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Measurement of balance, lower extremity strength, and functional capacity in older adults (>65 years of age). The test includes three different domains (walking, sit-to-stand and balance) to assess functional mobility.
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
Readmissions
Time Frame: Readmissions are assessed at 12 months
From the electronic patient journal, data on number of participants who are readmitted, and number of individual readmissions, are collected
Readmissions are assessed at 12 months
Survival rates
Time Frame: Mortality is assessed at 12 months
From the electronic patient journal, potential deaths amongst participants are collected
Mortality is assessed at 12 months
EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
The EQ-5D-5L test assesses health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems." Patients select the level that best describes their health, resulting in a 5-digit number representing their health state. The EQ VAS is a separate measure where patients rate their overall health on a scale from "the best health you can imagine" to "the worst health you can imagine."
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 6 weeks
The EQ-5D-5L test assesses health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems." Patients select the level that best describes their health, resulting in a 5-digit number representing their health state. The EQ VAS is a separate measure where patients rate their overall health on a scale from "the best health you can imagine" to "the worst health you can imagine."
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 6 weeks
EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 6 months
The EQ-5D-5L test assesses health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems." Patients select the level that best describes their health, resulting in a 5-digit number representing their health state. The EQ VAS is a separate measure where patients rate their overall health on a scale from "the best health you can imagine" to "the worst health you can imagine."
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 6 months
EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
The EQ-5D-5L test assesses health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems." Patients select the level that best describes their health, resulting in a 5-digit number representing their health state. The EQ VAS is a separate measure where patients rate their overall health on a scale from "the best health you can imagine" to "the worst health you can imagine."
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-up are assessed at 12 months
30 Seconds Sit To Stand Test
Time Frame: Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
Assessment of mobility and functional capacity, particularly in older adults or individuals with mobility impairments that measures lower body strength and endurance. The patient is asked to sit in a chair with their arms crossed over their chest and then stand up and sit down as many times as possible within 30 seconds. The total number of complete stands is recorded as the score.
Baseline measurement at initation of intervention
30 Seconds Sit To Stand Test
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 6 weeks
Assessment of mobility and functional capacity, particularly in older adults or individuals with mobility impairments that measures lower body strength and endurance. The patient is asked to sit in a chair with their arms crossed over their chest and then stand up and sit down as many times as possible within 30 seconds. The total number of complete stands is recorded as the score.
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 6 weeks
30 Seconds Sit To Stand Test
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 6 months
Assessment of mobility and functional capacity, particularly in older adults or individuals with mobility impairments that measures lower body strength and endurance. The patient is asked to sit in a chair with their arms crossed over their chest and then stand up and sit down as many times as possible within 30 seconds. The total number of complete stands is recorded as the score.
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 6 months
30 Seconds Sit To Stand Test
Time Frame: Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 12 months
Assessment of mobility and functional capacity, particularly in older adults or individuals with mobility impairments that measures lower body strength and endurance. The patient is asked to sit in a chair with their arms crossed over their chest and then stand up and sit down as many times as possible within 30 seconds. The total number of complete stands is recorded as the score.
Changes from baseline mobility at follow-ups are assessed at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anna L Stoustrup, MSc, a.stoustrup@rn.dk

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COPDtoParis

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data are accessible through enquiry to principal investigator

IPD Sharing Time Frame

01/09/2025

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Home-based cycle-exercise for COPD patients

Subscribe