Simeox Therapy At Home Versus Standard of Care in NCFB Patients with CMH

February 27, 2025 updated by: Physio-Assist

Airway Clearance Therapy with Simeox Technology in Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis Patients with Chronic Mucus Hypersecretion - a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Pilot Study

This pilot RCT will assess benefits of Simeox technology on lung function, respiratory symptoms, health-related quality of life, subjective efficiency, device adherence at home, Patient satisfaction, tolerance, safety, and telecare feasibility.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) is a chronic respiratory disease with multiple etiologies characterized by an irreversible dilatation of bronchi and an impair mucociliary clearance. These alterations cause sticky mucus retention and leads to recurrent infections and chronic bronchial inflammations. Chest physiotherapy is one of the cornerstones of the management of NCFB patients, particularly to facilitate airway clearance. In NCFB patients with chronic mucus hypersecretion (CMH), it is recommended that airway clearance sessions be carried out daily or several times a day, which represents a very significant burden of care. Moreover, access to respiratory physiotherapy for patients can be limited due to several causes: geographical, time or healthcare professional availability constraints. In addition, few healthcare professionals are trained for bronchial drainage especially with airway clearance devices.

SIMEOX® (Physio-Assist, France) is an innovative medical device (CE medical mark) for mucus clearance. The device is connected to patient mouth with an expiratory kit circuit. When the patient starts up the device during exhalation only, SIMEOX® disseminates a vibratory pneumatic signal in the bronchi that liquefies mucus and transports it from distal to central airways for sputum expectoration. After device training with respiratory physiotherapist, patients can be treated at hospital and use SIMEOX® in autonomy at home. Device training and patient follow-up can be performed also remotely with telecare with similar efficiency than face to face visits with health care professionals.

The main objective of this Pilot study is to evaluate the effects of mid-term use of SIMEOX® in autonomy at home for 2 months in NCFB patients with CMH and pulmonary exacerbation (in- or outpatients) in comparison to standard of care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kraków, Poland, 30-688
        • Jagiellonian University Medical College
      • Lodz, Poland, 90-153
        • N. Barlicki University Hospital No 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with confirmed diagnosis of bronchiectasis confirmed by High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT): idiopathic, post-infective, systemic disease, ABPA, asthma, COPD, PCD
  • Overproduction of mucus (ie: estimated bronchorrhea >10mL/day).
  • Pulmonary exacerbation (in- or outpatients)
  • Age > 18 years old
  • Patient able to understand the study and to perform the 2-month follow up visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pneumothorax/pneumo-mediastinum in the six months prior hospitalization
  • Recent episode of severe haemoptysis
  • Unstable severe cardiac disease or hemodynamic instability
  • Cystic fibrosis or COPD as dominant diagnosis
  • Patient on lung transplant list
  • Severe lung injuries
  • Recent lung surgery
  • Inhalation support (continuous ventilatory support)
  • Tracheostomy
  • Uncontrolled GERD
  • Any contraindication to an instrumental bronchial clearance technique (up to the investigator)
  • Inability to perform PFT or 6MWT
  • Patient not available or wishing to move to a different region within 2 months of inclusion
  • Patient considered by the investigator to be physically or mentally inapt to use the device and/or to perform the study procedures.
  • Patient currently participating or having participated within one month prior to inclusion in a clinical intervention research trial that may impact the study, the impact of which is up to the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Simeox
Airway clearance device
Daily airway clearance therapy at home during 2 months
Daily airway clearance therapy at home during 2 months
Other Names:
  • Usual chest physiotherapy (manual, breathing exercise, PEP/oPEP)
Active Comparator: Control
Usual chest physiotherapy (manual, breathing exercise, PEP/oPEP)
Daily airway clearance therapy at home during 2 months
Other Names:
  • Usual chest physiotherapy (manual, breathing exercise, PEP/oPEP)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To describe the evolution in Self-reported home adherence from baseline (hospital discharge) during follow-up
Time Frame: 2 months
The evolution of device adherence will be described by % of self-reported sessions (0-1; 2-3; 4-7/week) by the patient over the 2-month FU (1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month and 2 months)
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the effect of Simeox on respiratory symptoms in NCFB patients after 2 months of therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
The change in respiratory symptoms score from baseline (hospital discharge) to 2-month FU will be measured with the Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAT) questionaire
2 months
To evaluate the effect of Simeox on the health-related quality of life of NCFB patients after 2 months of therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
The change in quality of life from baseline (hospital discharge) to 2-month FU will be measured with the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
2 months
To evaluate the effect of Simeox on Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 seconde (FEV1) after 2 monts of therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
The change in FEV1 from baseline (hospital discharge) to 2-month FU will be measured with spirometry
2 months
To evaluate the effect of Simeox on Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) after 2 monts of therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
The change in FVC from baseline (hospital discharge) to 2-month FU will be measured with spirometry
2 months
To evaluate the effect of Simeox on Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) at 25%, 50% and 75% of FVC after 2 monts of therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
The change in FEF at 25%, 50% and 75% from baseline (hospital discharge) to 2-month FU will be measured with spirometry
2 months
To evaluate the effect of Simeox on dyspnea after 2 monts of therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
The change in dyspnea from baseline (hospital discharge) to 2-month FU will be measured with the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) questionnaire
2 months
To evaluate the effect of Simeox on exercise capacity after 2 monts of therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
The change in walking distance from baseline (hospital discharge) to 2-month FU will be measured with the 6-min walking test (6MWT)
2 months
To evaluate safety of Simeox
Time Frame: 2 months
The safety of Simeox will be assessed by the rate and severity of Side effects during follow-up
2 months
To describe Simeox therapy settings (program selection) during follow-up
Time Frame: 2 months
Simeox settings will be described by program selection (1, 2 or 3)
2 months
To describe Simeox therapy settings (intensity) during follow-up
Time Frame: 2 months
Simeox settings will be described by intensity (25%, 50%, 75% or 100%)
2 months
To describe Simeox therapy settings (number of session) during follow-up
Time Frame: 2 months
Simeox settings will be described by the number of sessions per day
2 months
To describe Simeox therapy settings (session duration) during follow-up
Time Frame: 2 months
Simeox settings will be described by the session duration in minutes
2 months
To evaluate mucus quality with Simeox therapy during follow-up
Time Frame: 2 months
Mucus quality will be evaluated during follow-up with a score from 1 to 4 (abondant - Scanty)
2 months
To evaluate breathing quality with Simeox therapy during follow-up
Time Frame: 2 months
Breathing quality level will be evaluated during follow-up with a score from 1 to 4 (very good - very poor)
2 months
To evaluate ease handling of the Simeox device during follow-up
Time Frame: 2 months
Ease of handling level will be evaluated during follow-up with a score 1 to 4 (very easy - not easy at all)
2 months
To evaluate pain during Simeox therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
Pain level will be evaluated during follow-up with a scale from 0 to10 (no painful - very painful)
2 months
To evaluate fatigue during Simeox therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
Fatigue level will be evaluated during follow-up with a scale from 0 to 10 (no fatigue - very tired)
2 months
To evaluate ease of use of Simeox device after 2 months of therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
Ease of use level will be evaluated at 2 month with a score from 1 to 4 (very easy - not easy at all)
2 months
To evaluate patient preference between Simeox device and usual care after 2 months of therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
Patient preference will be evaluated at 2 month in comparaison to conventional techniques used (yes/no)
2 months
To evaluate patient recommendation to others patients of Simeox device after 2 months of therapy
Time Frame: 2 months
Patient recommendation to others patients will be evaluated at 2 month (yes/no)
2 months
Evaluate the feasibility of telecare during follow-up
Time Frame: 2 months
Feasibility of telecare during follow-up will be estimated by the percent of call visit performed with the patients compared to the number of call visits scheduled in the protocol
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Wojciech PIOTROWSKI, MD, PhD, Medical University of Lodz

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Simeox 1.1 290623

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

Clinical Trials on Simeox

Subscribe