Extraperitoneal SINgle-port rObotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) Versus Transperitoneal Multi-port RARP in the Treatment Of Prostate Cancer (SINO-TOP)

February 1, 2024 updated by: Ren Shancheng, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
This study is a two-arm, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial on whether single-port extraperitoneal VIP RARP is non-inferior to multi-port transperitoneal RARP in terms of functional recovery rate and other key metrics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Multicenter enrollment of 480 patients with localized prostate cancer meeting enrollment criteria are randomized to undergo either single-port robotic extraperitoneal VIP radical prostatectomy or multi-port robotic transperitoneal bilateral intrafascial radical prostatectomy for perioperative data recording, treatment, and monitoring with 1 year follow up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

480

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 201109
        • Recruiting
        • Changzheng hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men aged 18 years ≤ age ≤ 75 years;
  2. Prostate biopsy within 6 months with diagnosis of organ-localized prostate cancer with preoperative staging of T1c to T2b,N0M0;.
  3. Gleason Score<8.
  4. PSA<20ng/ml.
  5. Pathologic diagnosis of prostate follicular adenocarcinoma or prostate ductal adenocarcinoma;
  6. The patient has healthy sexual function before surgery and intention for sexual activities after surgery;
  7. Physiological condition acceptable for laparoscopic surgery;
  8. Willing to cooperate and complete the study follow-up and related examinations;
  9. The subject or his agent voluntarily participates in this trial and signs the written informed consent;
  10. The questionnaire can be completed in Chinese.
  11. The patient has been informed of the trial;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. High-risk and non-organ localized prostate cancer (clinical stage ≥ T2c, GS ≥ 8, PSA > 20ng/ml);
  2. Special type of prostate cancer, such as neuroendocrine etc.;
  3. History of previous abdominal surgery and radiotherapy which may affect abdominal incision and Port placement;
  4. Recent surgery of rectum, perianal abscess or around fistula and perineal area;
  5. Patients who have undergone previous electro-prostatectomy/enucleation of the prostate;
  6. Non-recurrent patients with less than 12 months of follow-up;
  7. ECOG>1.
  8. Combination of other systemic tumors;
  9. had received any type of preoperative antitumor therapy;
  10. Suffering from poor general condition with the presence of one of the following conditions: including severe mental disorders, cardiovascular disease, active infections, bone marrow transplantation within 3 months, or significant abnormalities in organ function;
  11. Participation in other clinical studies or previous treatment with any gene therapy product within the last 3 months;
  12. Other conditions that the researchers believe may affect the experimental results or are unethical;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single-port extraperitoneal RARP
Single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy (VIP) techniques
Patients with localized prostate cancer are randomized into this group in a 1:1 ratio and receive single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy(VIP) techniques. The investigators will monitor patients for perioperative data recording, treatment and 1-year follow-up.
Active Comparator: Multi-port transperitoneal RARP
Multi-port transperitoneal RARP with bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing techniques
Patients with localized prostate cancer are randomized into this group in a 1:1 ratio and receive multi-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing techniques. The investigators will monitor patients for perioperative data recording, treatment and 1-year follow-up.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Potency recovery rate
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
Potency recovery rate 3 months postoperatively, based on the patient's description of whether the erection is firm enough for sexual activity or intercourse.
3 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Continence recovery rate
Time Frame: Up to 1 year, at a frequency of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
The rate of recovery of continence postoperatively, measured in the number of pads used per day.
Up to 1 year, at a frequency of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
PSA
Time Frame: Up to 1 year, at a frequency of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
PSA status postoperatively,measured in ng/mL
Up to 1 year, at a frequency of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Potency recovery rate
Time Frame: Up to 1 year, at a frequency of 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Potency recovery rate will be assessed by patient's self-reported erectile firmness for sexual activity or intercourse, International Index of Erectile Dysfunction(IIEF-5) score(from 0-25 score, a higher score means a worse outcome), and phosphodiesterase5 (PDE-5)inhibitor intake frequency according to patients' despciption (a higher intake means a worse outcome).
Up to 1 year, at a frequency of 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Clavien-Dindo complication score
Time Frame: Every day during period of hospitalization (up to 7 days)

Clavien-Dindo complication score measured in the following grades(a higher grade means a worse outcome) : First grade:complications that do not require medication, surgery or endoscopic treatment.

Second grade: complications require to be treated with drugs, including blood transfusion and parenteral nutrition.

Third grade: complications that require surgery, endoscopy, or radiation therapy.

Fourth grade: the emergence of life-threatening complications, including cerebral hemorrhage, etc., which is also divided into 4a and 4b, 4a is single-organ dysfunction, 4b is mainly multi-organ dysfunction and injury.

Fifth grade: death.

Every day during period of hospitalization (up to 7 days)
Operative time
Time Frame: During operation(on an average of 90-120minutes )
Time elapsed from skin incision to placement of the final skin suture, measured in minutes
During operation(on an average of 90-120minutes )
Estimated blood loss
Time Frame: During operation(on an average of 90-120minutes )
Estimated blood loss, measured in volume (mL)
During operation(on an average of 90-120minutes )
Number of additional ports
Time Frame: During operation(on an average of 90-120minutes )
Number of additional ports needed in surgery
During operation(on an average of 90-120minutes )
Period of hospitalization
Time Frame: During period of hospitalization (up to 7 days)
Hospital stay, counted in days from the first day of hospitalization to discharge
During period of hospitalization (up to 7 days)
Period of hospitalization post surgery
Time Frame: Post surgery, during period of hospitalization (up to 7 days)
Hospital stay, counted in days from the time of transfer to the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) to discharge
Post surgery, during period of hospitalization (up to 7 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Adenocarcinoma

3
Subscribe