Transauricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation, Pressure Pain and Interoception

September 25, 2025 updated by: Laura De Herde, Aalborg University

Effects of Transauricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Interoceptive Channels in Healthy Subjects

Interoception, the ability to perceive, process and respond to signals originating from within the body, is crucial for maintaining healthy physiological ranges. Indeed, dysfunction in this ability has been associated with various mood and pain disorders. Based on the overlap between the anatomical pathway of this ability and the site of action of the tool, transauricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) could modulate this interoception. However, little is known about the breadth, duration, and mechanism of interoception modulation by taVNS.

The study (Ethics Region Nord Jylland Denmark, N-20230022) will address these limitations, with 2 experiments with a focus on three interoceptive channels: deep muscular pressure pain, heartbeat, and thermal perception.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The first experiment will aim to corroborate and extend the pain-modulating effect of taVNS to other interoceptive functions and to vagal-activation markers. For this, 30 healthy subjects will complete a randomized, active control, crossover study. The main intervention is left concha taVNS (NEMOS, CerboMed GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) for 20 minutes (200µs duration, 25Hz, at a personalized intensity). This will be compared to an active control of identical electrical stimulation to the left earlobe. A blinding assessment inquiring which stimulation is supposed to be therapeutic will be collected. Main outcomes are pressure pain thresholds and temporal summation of pain responses acquired via cuff-pressure algometer (Cortex Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark) placed at the calf. Heartbeat perception, assessed via the heartbeat counting task, and thermal perception, assessed using a QST thermal grid, are also primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes are conditioned pain modulation, resting state electroencephalography, electrocardiography, and pupillary light reflexes. To assess whether, and how, taVNS modulates deep muscular pressure pain, heartbeat, and thermal perception, primary and secondary measurements pre, post and 30min post stimulation will be collected and compared. To assess the duration of the potential effects, these outcomes will be collected, and compared, at 5min intervals until the primary measurements are within 20% of baseline values. Given baseline is recovered, the second stimulation session will take place. Given this has not occurred within 1.5h of the cessation of the stimulation in the first stimulation session, subjects will be asked to come back at their earliest convenience.

The second experiment will additionally explore the effect of stimulation paradigm and intensity. For this, 20 healthy subjects will complete a randomized, active and sham control, crossover study. The main intervention is left concha taVNS (NEMOS, CerboMed GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) for 40 minutes (200µs duration, 25Hz). This will be compared to an active control of identical electrical stimulation to the left earlobe and sham stimulation. Stimulation intensity will be given at 2/3rd of perception to pain threshold and at pain thresholds. A burst and continuous paradigm will also be employed. A blinding assessment inquiring which stimulation is supposed to be therapeutic will be collected. Main outcomes are pressure pain thresholds acquired via cuff-pressure algometer (Cortex Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark) placed at the calf. Heartbeat perception, assessed via the heartbeat counting task is also primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes are conditioned pain modulation, resting state electroencephalography, electrocardiography, and pupillary light reflexes. Assessments will be acquire pre, during and post stimulation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Denmark
      • Gistrup, North Denmark, Denmark, 9260
        • Center For Neuroplasticity and Pain

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Are aged 18-60
  • Are healthy
  • Speak and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are pregnant and/or breastfeeding
  • Regularly use cannabis, opioids, or other drugs
  • Currently or previously suffered of a neurologic, musculoskeletal, mental, or other illnesses (e.g., brain or spinal cord injuries, degenerative neurological disorders, major depression, cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, etc.)
  • Once or more a week take of analgesic medication or other medication which may affect the trial (including paracetamol and NSAIDs)
  • Have a recent history of acute pain, particularly in the lower limbs.
  • Have abnormally disrupted sleep in 24 hours preceding experiment.
  • Have contraindications to electric application (history of epilepsy, metal implants in head or jaw, etc.)
  • Lack the ability to cooperate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Earlobe Stimulation
Electrodes (Ambu, Neuroline, Bordeaux, France) will respectively be placed on the front and back of the earlobe. When appropriate, these electrodes will be plugged into a digitimer . Whilst pulse width, frequency, stimulation burst and total duration will be respectively standardized to 200microseconds, 25Hz, continuous and 20minutes, the stimulation will be person specific. To acquire this intensity, participants will perform a thresholding protocol. Based on an elegant stair-case algorithm, the perception and pain (described as a 7/10 pain level, where 10 is the most amount of pain imaginable) thresholds will be obtained. Stimulation intensity will then be defined as 2/3 the range between these thresholds. For example, if the perception and pain thresholds are respectively at 2mA and 8mA, the stimulation intensity would be 6mA.
Standard electrodes (Ambu, Neuroline, Bordeaux, France) cut into 0.6cm circles, attached to a digitimer.
Experimental: transauricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation

NEMOS taVNS electrodes will be placed in the left concha cymba of participants (CerboMed GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). When appropriate, these electrodes will be plugged into a digitimer. Whilst pulse width, frequency, stimulation burst and total duration will be respectively standardized to 200microseconds and 25Hz.

In the first experiment, continuous and 20min stimulation will be applied at one person-specific intensity. To acquire this, using an elegant stair-case algorithm, perception and supra-pain (described as a 7/10 pain level, where 10 is the most amount of pain imaginable) thresholds will be obtained. Stimulation intensity will then be defined as 2/3 the range between these thresholds.

In the second experiment, burst and continuous stimulation will be applied for 40min. Two intensities will be used: 2/3 the range between perception and supra-pain thresholds and supra-pain thresholds.

transauricular vagal nerve stimulation electrodes (NEMOS, CerboMed GmbH, Erlangen, Germany), attached to a digitimer.
Sham Comparator: Sham
No current will be applied to the ear of the participant.
transauricular vagal nerve stimulation electrodes (NEMOS, CerboMed GmbH, Erlangen, Germany), attached to a digitimer.
Standard electrodes (Ambu, Neuroline, Bordeaux, France) cut into 0.6cm circles, attached to a digitimer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Perception Threshold
Time Frame: This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention. It will also be taken in 5min intervals post-intervention until the PPT is back within 20% of the pre-intervention value.
Pressure algometer cuffs, placed on the calf of participants, attached to an electronic visual analogue scale (VAS) measuring device will be employed. Per cuff, as it inflates, participants are asked to move the dial of the VAS when the pressure begins to be painful. The pressure at which this occurs is referred to as the pain perception threshold (PPT).
This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention. It will also be taken in 5min intervals post-intervention until the PPT is back within 20% of the pre-intervention value.
Pain Tolerance Threshold
Time Frame: This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
Pressure algometer cuffs, placed on the calf of participants, attached to a visual analogue scale (VAS) will be employed. Per cuff, as it inflates, participants are asked to move the dial of the VAS when the pressure begins to be painful. They are then tasked to accordingly move the dial as the pain increases. Importantly, when the pain becomes intolerable, participants are tasked to press the red button which releases all pressure. The pressure at which this occurs is referred to as the pain tolerance threshold (PTT).
This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
Temporary Summation of Pain
Time Frame: This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
The pressure algometer cuff will inflate on the dominant leg for 1second, with a 1second break, to the given PTT 10 times consecutively. Participants are asked to move the VAS dial to the pain level at each inflation, without returning to 0 on the scale. Nothing will be done with the cuff on the opposite leg.
This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
Heartbeat Perception
Time Frame: This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
Randomly interleaved and without manual help, subjects will be tasked to count their own heartbeat across 3 time-intervals (25, 35 and 45 seconds). The difference between the perceived and actual heartbeat count is defined herein as the heartbeat perception.
This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
Thermal Perception
Time Frame: This measurement will be acquired pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
The QST.lab thermal stimulator contains 6 stimulation regions, which can individually be programmed. First, with all regions programmed identically, participants will be tasked to state when the stimulus is perceived as painfully cold and warm. These will respectively be the cold and warm thresholds. A thermal-grid illusion pattern will then be generated: this involves interleaving stimulation regions as cold (2deg above the cold threshold) and hot (2deg below the hot threshold). Participants will then be asked to rate the pain intensity of this stimulation (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable).
This measurement will be acquired pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Conditioned Pain Modulation
Time Frame: This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
The non-dominant leg will receive a continuous pressure of 70% of the PTT previously registered. The cuff on the dominant leg will gradually inflate. As this occurs, participants are once again asked to start moving the dial when the pressure begins to be painful, and to press the red button when this becomes intolerable.
This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
Handheld Pain Perception Threshold
Time Frame: This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
For each side separately, a handheld pressure algometer will be applied at a constant rate of 30kPa/s, perpendicularly to the belly of the musculus trapezius. Participants will be instructed to press a button when they first perceive the pressure to be painful. This is referred to as the handheld pain perception threshold.
This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pupil Light Reflex
Time Frame: This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
Using a pupilometer, covering the other eye, the size of one pupil will be measured during the light reflex. This will be done for both eyes.
This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
Resting State Electroencephalography
Time Frame: This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, during the intervention and post- and 30min post-intervention.
Using electroencephalography (g.tec medical engineering, Austria), namely a cap of electrodes conducted to the head using gel, resting state brain activity will be recorded
This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, during the intervention and post- and 30min post-intervention.
Resting State Electrocardiography
Time Frame: This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.
Using electrocardiography, namely electrodes placed on the torso of participants, resting state cardiac activity will be recorded.
This measurement will be taken pre-intervention, and directly post- and 30min post-intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 7, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 7, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be anonymized. During the experiment, personal data necessary for the execution of the project will be processed, and after termination of the experiment, personal data in accordance with the Data Protection Regulation.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Acute

Clinical Trials on taVNS

Subscribe