The Effect Of High And Low Molecular Weight Sodium Hyaluronic Acid Eye Drops After Crosslinking

January 29, 2024 updated by: Marmara University

The Effect Of High And Low Molecular Weight Sodium Hyaluronic Acid Eye Drops On Corneal Recovery After Crosslinking

Purpose: The objective of this investigation was to assess the impact of eye drops containing high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HMW-HA) and low molecular weight hyaluronic acid (LMW-HA) on corneal nerve regeneration, dendritic cell (DC) density, corneal sensitivity (CS), and ocular surface parameters in patients with keratoconus following corneal crosslinking (CXL).

Methods: Sixty-three eyes of 55 keratoconus patients were randomized to instill eye drops containing HMW-HA (n: 20) for 12 months, LMW-HA (n:23) for 12 months and polyvinyl alcohol (n: 20) until the epithelial defect closure in the control group after CXL. Subbasal nerve plexsus (SNP) was imaged with corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) and ACCMetrics program was used to quantify corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), corneal nerve fiber branching density (CNBD) and corneal nerve fiber total branching density (CTBD). DC density was calculated with Image J software. CS was measured using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, non-invasive break-up time (NI-TBUT) were evaluated. All measurements were performed before CXL and postoperatively after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study assessed individuals aged 18 and above diagnosed with keratoconus and scheduled for epithelium-off CXL. A total of 63 eyes from 55 keratoconus patients were randomly assigned using computer-generated randomization (www.random.org/integers) into three groups: 20 eyes in the HMW-HA group, 23 eyes in the LMW-HA group, and 20 eyes in the control group without the administration of artificial tears.

Post-CXL, the HMW-HA group received topical HMW-HA (Comfort Shield®, i.com medical GmbH, Munich, Germany) three times daily for 12 months, the LMW-HA group received topical LMW-HA (Thealose Duo®, Thea, Clermont-Ferrand, France) three times daily for 12 months, and the control group received topical polyvinyl alcohol (Refresh, Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) three times daily until epithelial defect closure. All participants underwent accelerated epithelium-off CXL (A-CXL) for 10 minutes with 9 mW/cm² ultraviolet-A irradiation. The postoperative standard treatment regimen included topical moxifloxacin (0.5% Vigamox, Alcon Inc, USA) for one week, topical dexamethasone (0.1% Dexasine-SE, Kaysersberg Pharmaceuticals, France) for one week after epithelial closure, followed by topical loteprednol 0.5% (Lotemax, Bausch & Lomb, USA) for three weeks.

Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and manifest spherical equivalent (SE) were recorded at all visits. The assessment was carried out in the following order: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), corneal tomography (Pentacam, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany), corneal sensitivity, corneal fluorescein staining, and CCM imaging. Examinations were conducted preoperatively and at the postoperative 1th, 3rd, 6th and 12th months.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pendik
      • Istanbul, Pendik, Turkey, 34890
        • Marmara University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Fifty-five patients with keratoconus were included in the study. All participants underwent accelerated epithelium-off CXL (A-CXL) for 10 minutes with 9 mW/cm² ultraviolet-A irradiation. A total of 63 eyes from 55 keratoconus patients were assigned into three groups: 17 patiens (20 eyes) in the HMW-HA group, 22 patient (23 eyes) in the LMW-HA group, and 20 patient (20 eyes) in the control group.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Keratoconus patiens aged 18 and above who had been scheduled for corneal crosslinking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dry eye disease, corneal thickness below 400 micrometer, pregnancy, breastfeeding, topical or systemic drug use, eye disease other than keratoconus, systemic diseases, active atopy or allergy, contact lens use, ocular surgery history.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Control group
Nineteen patiens (20 eyes) received topical polyvinyl alcohol (Refresh, Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) three times daily until epithelial defect closure after CXL in control group.
CCM was performed using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 with the Rostock Cornea Module (HRT3-RCM, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Germany) under topical anesthesia. A viscous gel (Viscotears, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK) served as a coupling agent between the cornea and the applanation cap. The subjects were instructed to focus on the fixation light with the unexamined eye to ensure proper positioning. Five high-quality images of the SNP were selected and analyzed using the automated tracing of nerve fibers program (ACCMetrics, M.A. Dabbah, Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, Manchester, England).
Corneal sensitivity was evaluated using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau Ophtalmologue, Chartres, France), comprising a nylon filament measuring 60 mm in length and 0.12 mm in diameter. Participants were instructed to maintain a forward gaze while the esthesiometer gently made perpendicular contact. The procedure involved gradually decreasing the filament length in 5 mm increments, starting from 60 mm, until the initial response from the subject was detected.
Noninvasive tear break-up time (NI-TBUT) was assessed using a Sirius Scheimpflug camera (CSO, Florence, Italy) and the device automatically provided the average NI-TBUT value
The Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire consists of a total of 12 questions categorized into three subscales as follows: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers. Each patient is asked to rate the symptoms on a 5-point scale ranging from never (0 score) to always (4 score) for every question in the questionnaire. The fourth and fifth questions in the first section, concerning blurred vision and reduced vision symptoms, were excluded from the questionnaire as these symptoms may already be present in patients with keratoconus disease. The total OSDI score was calculated according to the formula: OSDI = [(sum of scores for all questions answered) × 100] / [(total number of questions answered) × 4].
Scheimpflug-tomography device (Pentacam, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) was used for measurement of keratometric values.
LMW-HA group
Twenty-two patiens (23 eyes) received topical LMW-HA (Thealose Duo®, Thea, Clermont-Ferrand, France) three times daily for 12 months.
CCM was performed using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 with the Rostock Cornea Module (HRT3-RCM, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Germany) under topical anesthesia. A viscous gel (Viscotears, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK) served as a coupling agent between the cornea and the applanation cap. The subjects were instructed to focus on the fixation light with the unexamined eye to ensure proper positioning. Five high-quality images of the SNP were selected and analyzed using the automated tracing of nerve fibers program (ACCMetrics, M.A. Dabbah, Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, Manchester, England).
Corneal sensitivity was evaluated using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau Ophtalmologue, Chartres, France), comprising a nylon filament measuring 60 mm in length and 0.12 mm in diameter. Participants were instructed to maintain a forward gaze while the esthesiometer gently made perpendicular contact. The procedure involved gradually decreasing the filament length in 5 mm increments, starting from 60 mm, until the initial response from the subject was detected.
Noninvasive tear break-up time (NI-TBUT) was assessed using a Sirius Scheimpflug camera (CSO, Florence, Italy) and the device automatically provided the average NI-TBUT value
The Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire consists of a total of 12 questions categorized into three subscales as follows: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers. Each patient is asked to rate the symptoms on a 5-point scale ranging from never (0 score) to always (4 score) for every question in the questionnaire. The fourth and fifth questions in the first section, concerning blurred vision and reduced vision symptoms, were excluded from the questionnaire as these symptoms may already be present in patients with keratoconus disease. The total OSDI score was calculated according to the formula: OSDI = [(sum of scores for all questions answered) × 100] / [(total number of questions answered) × 4].
Scheimpflug-tomography device (Pentacam, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) was used for measurement of keratometric values.
HMW-HA group
Seventeen patiens (20 eyes) received topical HMW-HA (Comfort Shield®, i.com medical GmbH, Munich, Germany) three times daily for 12 months.
CCM was performed using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 with the Rostock Cornea Module (HRT3-RCM, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Germany) under topical anesthesia. A viscous gel (Viscotears, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK) served as a coupling agent between the cornea and the applanation cap. The subjects were instructed to focus on the fixation light with the unexamined eye to ensure proper positioning. Five high-quality images of the SNP were selected and analyzed using the automated tracing of nerve fibers program (ACCMetrics, M.A. Dabbah, Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, Manchester, England).
Corneal sensitivity was evaluated using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau Ophtalmologue, Chartres, France), comprising a nylon filament measuring 60 mm in length and 0.12 mm in diameter. Participants were instructed to maintain a forward gaze while the esthesiometer gently made perpendicular contact. The procedure involved gradually decreasing the filament length in 5 mm increments, starting from 60 mm, until the initial response from the subject was detected.
Noninvasive tear break-up time (NI-TBUT) was assessed using a Sirius Scheimpflug camera (CSO, Florence, Italy) and the device automatically provided the average NI-TBUT value
The Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire consists of a total of 12 questions categorized into three subscales as follows: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers. Each patient is asked to rate the symptoms on a 5-point scale ranging from never (0 score) to always (4 score) for every question in the questionnaire. The fourth and fifth questions in the first section, concerning blurred vision and reduced vision symptoms, were excluded from the questionnaire as these symptoms may already be present in patients with keratoconus disease. The total OSDI score was calculated according to the formula: OSDI = [(sum of scores for all questions answered) × 100] / [(total number of questions answered) × 4].
Scheimpflug-tomography device (Pentacam, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) was used for measurement of keratometric values.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD)
Time Frame: Baseline
Automated tracing of nerve fibers program - CCMetrics (CCMetrics; M. A. Dabbah, ISBE, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK) was used to analyze CNFD.
Baseline
Corneal nerve branch density (CNBD)
Time Frame: Baseline
Automated tracing of nerve fibers program - CCMetrics (CCMetrics; M. A. Dabbah, ISBE, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK) was used to analyze CNBD.
Baseline
Corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD)
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Automated tracing of nerve fibers program - CCMetrics (CCMetrics; M. A. Dabbah, ISBE, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK) was used to analyze CNFD.
Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Corneal nerve branch density (CNBD)
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Automated tracing of nerve fibers program - CCMetrics (CCMetrics; M. A. Dabbah, ISBE, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK) was used to analyze CNBD.
Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL)
Time Frame: Baseline
Automated tracing of nerve fibers program - CCMetrics (CCMetrics; M. A. Dabbah, ISBE, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK) was used to analyze CNFL
Baseline
Corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL)
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Automated tracing of nerve fibers program - CCMetrics (CCMetrics; M. A. Dabbah, ISBE, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK) was used to analyze CNFL
Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Corneal nerve fiber total branching density (CTBD)
Time Frame: Baseline
Automated tracing of nerve fibers program - CCMetrics (CCMetrics; M. A. Dabbah, ISBE, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK) was used to analyze CTBD.
Baseline
Corneal nerve fiber total branching density (CTBD)
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Automated tracing of nerve fibers program - CCMetrics (CCMetrics; M. A. Dabbah, ISBE, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK) was used to analyze CTBD.
Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Corneal Sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline
Corneal sensitivity was assessed using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau Ophtalmologue, Chartes, France).
Baseline
Corneal Sensitivity
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Corneal sensitivity was assessed using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau Ophtalmologue, Chartes, France).
Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Dendritic cell density
Time Frame: Baseline
The Density of dendritic cells was calculated using ImageJ software (Image V.1.31; National Institutes of Health)
Baseline
Dendritic cell density
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
The Density of dendritic cells was calculated using ImageJ software (Image V.1.31; National Institutes of Health)
Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Ocular surface disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
The Turkish validated version of the OSDI, a questionnaire assesing the clinical symptoms of the ocular surface disease, was used. The 4th and 5th questions in the first section, which inquire about blurred vision and reduced vision symptoms, were excluded from the questionnaire as they could already be present in patients with keratoconus disease.
Baseline
Ocular surface disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
The Turkish validated version of the OSDI, a questionnaire assesing the clinical symptoms of the ocular surface disease, was used. The 4th and 5th questions in the first section, which inquire about blurred vision and reduced vision symptoms, were excluded from the questionnaire as they could already be present in patients with keratoconus disease.
Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
Non invaziv tear break-up time (NI-TBUT)
Time Frame: Baseline
The tear break-up time (TBUT) was evaluated non-invasively using a Sirius Scheimpflug camera (CSO, Florence, Italy).
Baseline
Non invaziv tear break-up time (NI-TBUT)
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months
The tear break-up time (TBUT) was evaluated non-invasively using a Sirius Scheimpflug camera (CSO, Florence, Italy).
Postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Functions
Time Frame: Baseline
Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by the Snellen chart, based on the logMAR scoring system and manifest spherical equivalent (SE) were assessed.
Baseline
Refractive Outcomes
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st, 3rd and 6th months
Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by the Snellen chart, based on the logMAR scoring system and manifest spherical equivalent (SE) were assessed.
Postoperative 1st, 3rd and 6th months
Keratometric Findings
Time Frame: Baseline
Corneal tomography (Pentacam, OCULUS, Wetzlar Germany) was used to obtain the data for K1, K2, Kmean, Kmax, and the Thinnest point (TP).
Baseline
Keratometric Findings
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st, 3rd and 6th months
Corneal tomography (Pentacam, OCULUS, Wetzlar Germany) was used to obtain the data for K1, K2, Kmean, Kmax, and the Thinnest point (TP).
Postoperative 1st, 3rd and 6th months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Semra Akkaya Turhan, Assoc. prof., Marmara University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Keratoconus

Clinical Trials on in vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy

Subscribe