Physiologic Pacing for Symptomatic First-Degree Heart Block

January 29, 2024 updated by: Daniel Kaiser, Ascension Health
The purpose of this study is to determine if physiologic pacing will improve symptoms and outcomes in patients with symptomatic first-degree heart block (pr interval ≥250ms).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to determine if physiologic pacing will improve symptoms and outcomes in patients with symptomatic first-degree heart block (pr interval ≥250ms). Patient will undergo a comparative effectiveness study where patients with symptomatic first-degree heart block (pr interval ≥250ms) undergo left bundle pacing (3830 lead) and are randomized to DDD-50 vs Managed Ventricular pacing-50 (MVP-50; AAI-DDD 50) and undergo a crossover at 3 months. This study will compare two standard of care options utilizing Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved devices. Patients are evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months in terms of patient symptoms, exercise capacity, arrhythmia burden, and patient activity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 or above
  • Ventricular Ejection Fraction (EF) > 50%
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV
  • PR interval ≥250ms
  • Narrow QRS duration (≤140ms) or prolonged QRS duration with typical Right Bundle Branch Block (RBBB) morphology on 12 lead ECG and sinus rhythm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Permanent atrial fibrillation (AF)
  • Patients who are unable to perform a 6 minute hall walk
  • Other serious medical condition with life expectancy of less than 1 year
  • Lack of capacity to consent
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindication to use of the relevant study device or leads (as per current manuals from manufacturer)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: DDD-50 followed by AAI-DDD 50
Patients will be programmed to DDD-50 first. After 3 months, patients will be programmed to AAI-DDD 50.

All patients will undergo a dual chamber Medtronic pacemaker implantation meeting approved indications for pacemaker implantation per Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines.

Pacemaker Model: Azure XT W1DR01. Right ventricular lead model: Medtronic 3830.

This device programming attempts to increase the amount of ventricular pacing via the Medtronic 3830 lead. Since the enrolled patients have a prolonged PR interval, this programming attempts to synchronic atrial and ventricular contractions.
This device programming attempts to encourage native conduction and minimize ventricular pacing via the Medtronic 3830 lead. This programming attempts to minimize ventricular pacing, which has been associated with worse outcomes by causing ventricular dyssynchrony between the left and right ventricles.
Other: AAI-DDD 50 followed by DDD-50
Patients will be programmed to AAI-DDD-50 first. After 3 months, patients will be programmed to DDD 50.

All patients will undergo a dual chamber Medtronic pacemaker implantation meeting approved indications for pacemaker implantation per Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines.

Pacemaker Model: Azure XT W1DR01. Right ventricular lead model: Medtronic 3830.

This device programming attempts to increase the amount of ventricular pacing via the Medtronic 3830 lead. Since the enrolled patients have a prolonged PR interval, this programming attempts to synchronic atrial and ventricular contractions.
This device programming attempts to encourage native conduction and minimize ventricular pacing via the Medtronic 3830 lead. This programming attempts to minimize ventricular pacing, which has been associated with worse outcomes by causing ventricular dyssynchrony between the left and right ventricles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life per the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)
Time Frame: 6 months after pacemaker implantation.
Determine if pacemaker programming influences quality of life based on Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)
6 months after pacemaker implantation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exercise capacity
Time Frame: 6 months after pacemaker implantation.
Determine if pacemaker programming influences exercise capacity (6 minute hall walk, Bruce protocol, or modified Bruce protocol).
6 months after pacemaker implantation.
Atrial fibrillation burden
Time Frame: 6 months after pacemaker implantation.
Determine if pacemaker programming influences overall burden of atrial fibrillation.
6 months after pacemaker implantation.
Patient activity
Time Frame: 6 months after pacemaker implantation.
Determine if pacemaker programming influences patient activity (as measured by device accelerometer).
6 months after pacemaker implantation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Symptomatic First-degree Heart Block

Clinical Trials on Dual chamber Medtronic pacemaker implantation.

Subscribe