The Clinical Impact of the Novel Alzheimer's Blood-based Biomarkers (PLASMAR)

February 26, 2024 updated by: Marc Suarez-Calvet, Hospital del Mar Research Institute (IMIM)

The Clinical Impact of the Novel Alzheimer's Blood-based Biomarkers: the PLASMAR Study

The goal of this observational study is to determine whether the early adoption of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease is associated with an impact on etiological diagnosis, patient's management, emotional impact, patient's preferences and cost-effectiveness in patients presenting with cognitive complaints in a Cognitive Disorders Unit from a public hospital.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does the early adoption of blood-based biomarkers in clinical practice enable an earlier etiologic diagnosis with high confidence compared to the late adoption of blood-based biomarkers in the patients with cognitive complaints that are admitted in a Cognitive Disorders Unit?
  2. Is the early adoption of blood-based biomarkers in clinical practice associated with changes in clinical management compared to their late adoption?
  3. Is the early adoption of blood-based biomarkers in clinical practice associated with a lower emotional impact in the patients and their study partners/caregivers compared to their late adoption?
  4. Are blood-based biomarkers better tolerated than other tests and preferred by patients for the diagnostic work-up?
  5. Does blood-based biomarkers have an impact in the cost of the diagnostic workup and clinical management of the patients that are admitted in a Cognitive Disorders Unit?

Participants will be asked to:

  • Perform a blood extraction for blood-based biomarkers analysis at the beginning of the study.
  • Complete specific scales in each visit.

Researchers will compare the group in which blood biomarkers are delivered at 3 months with the group in which they are delivered at 9 months to assess whether early adoption of blood-based biomarkers is associated with an impact on etiological diagnosis, patient's management, emotional impact, patient's preferences and cost-effectiveness in a specialized memory unit.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Blood-based biomarkers that accurately detect Alzheimer's disease (AD) and neurodegeneration now offer a realistic, cost-effective and non-invasive assessment that will aid the diagnostic process in patients presenting with cognitive clinical manifestations. Plasma measures of Amyloid-β (Aβ) 42/40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 181, p-tau217, p-tau231 and Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) have shown high diagnostic accuracy to detect AD, while plasma Neurofilament light chain (NfL) indicates neuronal injury. Despite these promising results, there is still no clear real-word evidence of their clinical applications. Here, the PLASMAR project aims to determine whether blood-based biomarkers have an impact on the clinical management of patients presenting with cognitive complaints in a Cognitive Disorders Unit from a public hospital, which provides care to a heterogeneous population. The project is divided into two specific objectives. First, the investigators will determine, in a research cohort, which blood biomarker or biomarkers' combination have the highest accuracy to detect AD. Second, a prospective clinical cohort of consecutive patients coming to the memory unit will be recruited. The investigators will assess whether early adoption of blood-based biomarkers is associated with an impact on etiological diagnosis, patient's management, emotional impact, patient's preferences and cost-effectiveness in a specialized memory unit. Answering the question of whether blood-based biomarkers have a clinical impact in the real-world scenario of a memory unit, the PLASMAR project is crucial for the healthcare system and can guide the developing of guidelines and protocols on the use of blood-based biomarkers.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Catalonia
      • Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 08003
        • Hospital del Mar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

PLASMAR is prospective, unicentric, unblinded and randomized controlled study with blinded outcome ascertainment. Two hundred new patients will be consecutively recruited. All consecutive new patients who are visited for the first time to the outpatients' Memory Clinic at the Neurology Service (Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain) will be considered for the study. Each patient will name a study partner to participate in this study, who will be considered for the study as well. In case the patient is diagnosed with dementia, a caregiver will be considered.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects ≥18 and ≤85 years old of any sex, gender, race or ethnicity.
  • Individuals interested in participating in the study who understand the procedures that will be performed.
  • The patient must have a complaint (reported by the patient or by a study partner/caregiver) of cognitive or behavioral impairment.
  • The patient must satisfy the clinical diagnostic criteria for subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, or mild dementia (defined as a Global deterioration scale score equal to 4), and a neurodegenerative disease such as AD is considered in the differential diagnosis.
  • Agreement to undergo all the study procedures, complete all clinical visits according to protocol and capacity to give informed consent.
  • The patient has undergone (maximum 12 months ago) or will undergo a dementia blood workup and MRI and/or CT scan before V1.
  • In dementia patients, a study partner must be available for the duration of the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any significant systemic illness or unstable medical condition that could make it difficult to comply with the protocol.
  • Medical contraindications for any of the study procedures.
  • Available AD's cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers levels or amyloid-PET at screening.
  • The patient comes to the Memory Unit for reasons other than cognitive or behavioral impairment.
  • Patients in which an etiological diagnosis is already made.
  • The patient is currently participating or has participated in a clinical trial with an investigational pharmaceutical product.
  • Women who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Early Blood-based biomarkers Arm
The results of the blood-based biomarkers will be communicated to the managing neurologist at visit 1 (at 3 months from baseline visit).
A blood test will be performed to obtain plasma measures of Amyloid-β (Aβ) 42/40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 181, p-tau217, p-tau231 and Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and results will be disclosure to the early and late arms at different time points.
Late Blood-based biomarkers Arm
The results of the blood-based biomarkers will be communicated to the managing neurologist at visit 2 (at 9 months from baseline visit).
A blood test will be performed to obtain plasma measures of Amyloid-β (Aβ) 42/40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 181, p-tau217, p-tau231 and Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and results will be disclosure to the early and late arms at different time points.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Etiological diagnosis
Time Frame: 9 months
The proportion of patients for whom an etiologic diagnosis is reached with very high confidence (≥90%) in each group at 3 and 9 months.
9 months
Suspicion of neurodegenerative disease
Time Frame: 9 months
The proportion of patients for whom a suspicion of neurodegenerative disease is reached as etiology with very high confidence (≥90%) in each group at 3 and 9 months.
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of tests for etiological diagnosis
Time Frame: 9 months
The number of tests necessary to reach an etiological diagnosis with very high confidence (≥90%) in each group at 3 and 9 months.
9 months
Number of tests for a suspicion of neurodegenerative disease
Time Frame: 9 months
The number of tests to reach a suspicion of neurodegenerative disease as etiology with very high confidence (≥90%) in each group at 3 and 9 months.
9 months
Neurologist diagnoses over time
Time Frame: 9 months
Changes in the neurologist's etiologic diagnosis in each group during the time of the study.
9 months
Neurologist confidence in the etiological diagnosis, which is is collected through the PLASMAR questionnaire at each visit.
Time Frame: 9 months
Changes in the neurologist's estimate of the likelihood that the patient's symptoms are due to AD in each group during the time of the study.
9 months
Neurologist confidence in the suspicion of neurodegenerative disease, which is is collected through the PLASMAR questionnaire at each visit.
Time Frame: 9 months
Changes in the neurologist's estimate of the likelihood that the patient's symptoms are due to a neurodegenerative disease as etiology in each group during the time of the study.
9 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients whose clinical management in the Cognitive Disorders Unit changes
Time Frame: 9 months
Changes in the prescription or withdrawal of disease-specific pharmacologic treatments (cholinesterase inhibitors, Memantine) and other pharmacologic or non-pharmacological interventions in addition to the number of patients who are discharged from the Cognitive Disorders Unit during the time of the study.
9 months
Emotional impact of blood-based biomarkers on patient and study partner/caregiver
Time Frame: 9 months
Changes in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; score: 0-42, with higher scores indicating higher anxiety or depression) and The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; score: 0-40, with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress) during the time of the study.
9 months
Impact of blood-based biomarkers on patient's quality of life
Time Frame: 9 months
Changes in the 5-level European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions scale (EQ-5D-5L; score: 5-25, with higher scores indicating worse severity index) during the time of the study.
9 months
Patient's tolerance to biomarkers tests and their preferences in how they want to be diagnosed
Time Frame: 9 months
Tolerance score for each of the tests performed as part of clinical practice during the time of the study.
9 months
Relative cost savings from the Implementation of blood-based biomarkers in the Cognitive Disorders Unit.
Time Frame: 9 months
The cost of the diagnostic work-up to achieve an etiologic diagnosis with very high confidence (≥90%) and the cost savings in resources (arising from pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions, as well as discharges) will be combined to determine the relative cost of implementing blood-based biomarkers compared to their non-implementation.
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc Suárez-Calvet, MD PhD, Hospital del Mar Research Insititute (IMIM)
  • Principal Investigator: Albert Puig-Pijoan, MD, Hospital del Mar Research Insititute (IMIM)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurodegenerative Diseases

Clinical Trials on Early adoption of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease

Subscribe