Feasibility of Optimizing Organized Cervical Cancer Screening by Urine Self-sampling (PAPPEES)

May 28, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux
This project addresses the issue of promoting organized cervical cancer screening (CCS) from the perspective of the use of urine self-sampling (USS). Via a prospective and monocentric study, the present study aims to evaluate the acceptability of women to collect a urine self-sample and to respond to a questionnaire on their feelings about this screening method.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In France, individual cervical cancer screening (CCS) has reduced the annual frequency of cervical cancer (CC), both in terms of incidence (2920 cases) and mortality (1117 deaths) : 2.5% reduction in CC incidence was observed per year between 1980 and 2012. More than 6 millions CCS are performed each year leading to the diagnosis of approximately 170,000 cytological abnormalities, including about 15,000 high-grade intraepithelial lesions, precursors of cancer. Since 2019, CCS is now recommended in France with cytology-based screening before 30 and high risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing from 30 to 65 years-old (screening interval of 5 years after a negative test).

Since only 50 to 60% of the target population is currently screened, the French High Authority for Health (HAS) has recently recommended the implementation of an organized screening program (OSP) to increase screening-participation and to reduce inequalities in access to screening. This OSP includes sending an invitation to under screened women for a consultation and a clinician taken cervical sample. However, the response rate to the OSP of cancers to a first letter of invitation is generally low, less than 20% (for example, the rate of participation in colon cancer screening in the french department of Gironde is 18.8% in 2020 (data from French Regional Coordination Center for Cancer Screening). This trend is particularly true in rural areas with low medical density: northern and southern areas of Gironde are concerned with 2/3 of under-screened women for CCS. Reducing social and territorial inequalities in participation in organized CCS and optimizing the screening process for the least participating women remain a challenge.

Self-sampling kits, with the possibility to be sent to the women, seem to be a promising alternative to overcome the low participation in these areas.

Vaginal self-sampling has already been shown to increase participation. More recent studies have focused on urine self-sampling for the detection of cervical precancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

173

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France
        • CHU Bordeaux

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women aged 31 to 49
  • Coming to the Bordeaux University Hospital for a gynecological consultation in order to have a cervical swab (PCC) for screening or follow-up.
  • Patient affiliated to or benefiting from a social security system
  • Non-objection to study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient unable to speak French and/or illiterate
  • Patient under legal protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: urine self-sampling
urine self-sampling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urine self-sampling acceptability
Time Frame: Baseline
Acceptability rate of self-testing obtained via questionnaire: The questionnaire survey methodology enables both quantitative and qualitative qualitative analysis of practices, opinions and behaviors according to and behaviors according to respondent characteristics (age, gender, level of education...). level, etc.). Content analysis of responses to open-ended questions consists in creating categories and classifying the different discourses in these categories categories in order to identify the main themes. The level of satisfaction will be assessed by classifying the emerging categories according to positive perceptions and obstacles.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cervical swab result
Time Frame: Baseline
positive/negative
Baseline
Urine test result
Time Frame: Baseline
positive/negative
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 19, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 19, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trials on urine self-sampling

Subscribe