- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06262425
rTMS Over S1 Enhance Motor Learning in Healthy People
Comparison of Different Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocols for Motor Learning in Healthy People. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of different repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) protocols in enhancing motor learning in healthy individuals. It focuses on two key brain areas: the primary motor cortex (M1) and the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), recognized for their roles in motor skill acquisition and execution.
Motor learning involves two distinct neural networks: the associative/premotor and sensorimotor networks. Studies suggest that the associative/premotor network predominates initially, followed by the sensorimotor network. M1 stores movement patterns, whereas S1 appears crucial for initial motor learning and movement adaptation.
rTMS, a non-invasive technique modulating neuronal excitability, has been used to improve motor function in patients with brain injuries. However, its effectiveness in healthy individuals has been variable, especially when stimulating M1 and S1. Prior research suggests that inhibitory rTMS in S1 may influence motor learning, but findings regarding its excitatory effect and comparison with M1 stimulation are mixed.
The primary hypothesis posits that excitatory rTMS in S1 will yield superior motor learning improvements compared to M1 stimulation in healthy individuals. The secondary hypothesis predicts improvements independent of the stimulated area.
The study will involve healthy participants, utilizing tests for accuracy and time. Methodology includes randomization, blind evaluation, and rTMS application based on assigned groups.
With a sample size of 35 subjects per group, data will be analyzed using parametric and non-parametric statistical tests to compare the effects of rTMS on M1 and S1 concerning motor learning in healthy subjects. Results will be considered significant with p < 0.05, and effect size will be evaluated.
This trial aims to provide clarity on the effectiveness of excitatory rTMS in specific brain areas to enhance motor learning in individuals without neurological pathologies, potentially impacting rehabilitation and motor performance.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Madrid
-
Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28045
- Neuron
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older than 18 years old and younger than 65
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presenting any neurological pathology
- Pain during the study
- Any contraindications to rTMS, such as metal implants, history of epileptic seizures or taking medication that lowers the seizure threshold
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex
Participants in the experimental group will receive 5 weekly sessions of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for two weeks.
An excitatory stimulation over the primary somatosensory area corresponding to the dominant hand will be applied.
For this purpose, the motor area will be localized and a coil will be placed 2 cm posterior to it.
An isolated pulse will be applied to the motor area to ensure that the coil is not placed over the motor area using 110% of the motor resting threshold.
After this, 22 trains of 10 Hz at an intensity of 90% of the motor resting threshold will be applied for 4 seconds, with a rest between series of 10 seconds (a total of 880 pulses).
After the stimulation, participants will train with the Forced Response training program for a total of 500 correct repetitions and the Purdue Pegboard Test with 4 repetitions for right hand, left hand and both hands.
|
It will be applyed a magnetic field over the Somatosensory cortex of the patient that pretends to hiperexcite the membrans of the neurons inthis area to enhance motor learning
|
|
Active Comparator: repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over primary motor cortex
Participants in the active comparator group will receive 5 weekly sessions of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for two weeks.
An excitatory stimulation over the primary motor cortex corresponding to the dominant hand will be applied.
For this purpose, the motor area will be localized, and an isolated pulse will be applied to the motor area to ensure that the coil is placed over the motor area using 100% of the motor resting threshold.
After this, 22 trains of 10 Hz at an intensity of 90% of the motor resting threshold will be applied for 4 seconds, with a rest between series of 10 seconds (a total of 880 pulses).
After the stimulation, participants will train with the Forced Response training program for a total of 500 correct repetitions and the Purdue Pegboard Test with 4 repetitions for right hand, left hand and both hands.
|
It will be applyed a magnetic field over the primary motor cortex of the patient that pretends to hiperexcite the membrans of the neurons inthis area to enhance motor learning
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Participants in the sham group will receive 5 weekly sessions of sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for two weeks.To achieve the placebo, the localization of the area to be stimulated will be carried out but the coil will be placed in a vertical position so the current will not go through the skull and the patient will just feel the vibration, communicating to the participant that it is likely that during the stimulation process he/she will not feel anything.
After the sham stimulation, participants will train with the Forced Response training program for a total of 500 correct repetitions and the Purdue Pegboard Test with 4 repetitions for right hand, left hand and both hands.
|
It will be applied a sham stimulation with the same protocol that pretends to create the illusion of being stimulated
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in accuracy
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 5 days and 10 days in accuracy
|
Accuracy in associating one letter of the keyboard with a letter from the Phoenician alphabet presented in the screen.
It will be measured by using the software PsychoPy, that has been used in other studies for measuring motor learning in an indirect way.
|
Change from Baseline to 5 days and 10 days in accuracy
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in reaction time speed
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 5 days and 10 days in reaction time speed
|
Reaction time for responding correctly the association between one letter of the keyboard and a letter from the Phoenician alphabet presented in the screen.
It will be measured by using the software PsychoPy, that has been used in other studies for measuring motor learning in an indirect way.
|
Change from Baseline to 5 days and 10 days in reaction time speed
|
|
Change in pegs placed in 30 seconds
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 5 days and 10 days in days placed in 30 seconds
|
Number of pegs placed in a pegboard in 30 seconds will be measured.
Patients will use just right hand first, after they will use just their left hand and finally with both hand at same time.
This procedure will be repeated and average pegs placed in each condition will be noted.
Purdue Pegboard Test will be used for measuring.
|
Change from Baseline to 5 days and 10 days in days placed in 30 seconds
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alfredo Lerín Calvo, PhD student, Neuron, Spain
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- ALC001NR004
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
-
University Hospital, GrenobleUnknownHealthy | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Transcranial Direct Current StimulationFrance
-
University of ZurichUniversity Hospital Inselspital, BerneRecruitingTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation | Electric Stimulation TherapySwitzerland
-
Florida State UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
Florida State UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...CompletedTranscranial Magnetic StimulationFrance
-
Florida State UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University of RegensburgCompletedTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation
-
Florida State UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Recruiting
-
Yi YangRecruitingTranscranial Magnetic StimulationChina
-
NYU Langone HealthWithdrawn
Clinical Trials on repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex
-
Shanghai Mental Health CenterXuhui Mental Health CenterRecruitingSchizophrenia | Cognitive Impairment | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia | Dorsolateral Prefrontal CortexChina
-
University of CalgaryDefence Research and Development CanadaCompletedBrain Injuries | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic | Biomarkers | Depression, Anxiety | Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyCanada
-
Emory UniversityWithdrawn
-
Emory UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsTerminatedStrokeUnited States
-
The Cleveland ClinicAmerican Heart AssociationCompleted
-
Universitat de LleidaNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy, SpasticSpain
-
Xuzhou Central HospitalThe Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingFunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Executive Function Disorder
-
Yanghua TianEnrolling by invitationInsomnia | Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)China
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompleted
-
Guangzhou Psychiatric HospitalCompletedCognitive Impairment | Bipolar Disorder | RelapseChina