Comparison of AMCOP Bioactivator and High-pull Headgear in Treating Skeletal Class II Hyperdivergent Pediatric Patients

May 21, 2024 updated by: Andrea Scribante, University of Pavia

Comparison of AMCOP Bioactivator and High-pull Headgear in Treating Skeletal Class II Hyperdivergent Pediatric Patients: a Retrospective Study

The aim of the present study was to retrospectively compare the clinical use of high-pull headgear versus AMCOP bioactivators for hyperdivergent pediatric patients.

Cephalometric radiographs from pediatric patients treated at the Unit of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Section of Dentistry, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy and at the private practice of Dr. Cardarelli, Isernia, Italy will be collected.

Cephalometric tracing from Giannì analysis will be performed at the baseline (T0) and after 18 months of treatment (T1).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The aim of the present study was to retrospectively compare the clinical use of high-pull headgear versus AMCOP bioactivators for hyperdivergent pediatric patients.

Cephalometric radiographs from pediatric patients treated at the Unit of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Section of Dentistry, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy and at the private practice of Dr. Cardarelli, Isernia, Italy will be collected.

Cephalometric tracing from Giannì analysis will be performed at the baseline (T0) and after 18 months of treatment (T1).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lombardy
      • Pavia, Lombardy, Italy, 27100
        • Unit of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatrics - University of Pavia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Orthodontic patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mixed or permanent dentition
  • skeletal class II malocclusion diagnosed with ANB angle > 4° from cephalometric radiograph
  • skeletal hyperdivergency calculated from AnsPns^GoGn angle > 25°, and at least S-Ar^Go > 149° or Ar-Go^Gn > 137°

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lack of compliance in the use of the orthodontic appliance
  • syndromic patients, cleft lip or cleft palate, severe malformations and asymmetries of the jaws.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Case group
Patients were treated with AMCOP for 18 months.
Control Headgear
Patients were treated with high-pull headgear for 18 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Linear regressions
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and after 18 months (T1)
Linear regressions among the variables of the study and sex, age, and group of the patients will be performed.
Baseline (T0) and after 18 months (T1)
Change in cephalometric angular measurements
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and after 18 months (T1)

The following angular measurements will be calculated in cephalometric radiographs:

SNA SNB ANB SN^GoGn AnsPns^GoGn Occl-MP Occl-AnsPns N-S-Ar S-Ar-Go Ar-Go-N N-Go-Gn 11-occl 11-ANSPNS 41-occl 41-GoGn Nasolabial angle Facial angle

Baseline (T0) and after 18 months (T1)
Change in cephalometric linear measurements
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and after 18 months (T1)

The following linear measurements will be calculated in cephalometric radiographs:

Anterior cranial base Mandibular body Mandibular ramus Posterior facial height Anterior facial height A0B0

Baseline (T0) and after 18 months (T1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Scribante, DDS, PhD, Mac, University of Pavia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-AMCOPTEO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be available upon motivated request to the Principal Investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skeletal Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on AMCOP group

Subscribe