Behavioral and Cognitive Predictors of Persistent Pain and Opioid Misuse in Chronic Pain

June 9, 2025 updated by: Chinwe Nwaneshiudu, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Chronic lower back pain (CLBP) affects approximately 20% of the global population. The study objective is to determine if impulsivity, inhibitory control, drug choice, and/or cognitive distortions predict opioid misuse and disability in patients with chronic pain. This is a prospective consented cross-sectional study characterizing behavioral and cognitive phenotypes using both patient-reported survey measures and cognitive testing. Outcome measures include correlations between impulsivity measures, opioid drug choice responses and cognitive distortion scores, and risk for opioid misuse (Primary outcomes: COMM scores, SOAPPR scores). Secondary outcomes is BPI measurement. A Certificate of Confidentiality will provide additional protections for participants.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

130

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Recruiting
        • Mount Sinai Pain management centers

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

chronic back pain

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • With diagnoses related to chronic lower back pain
  • Age above 18yrs
  • Non pregnant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with chronic back pain with lumbar, cervical or thoracic spine diagnoses.
No intervention will be used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Screener and Opioid Assessment for patients with pain revised (SOAPPR)
Time Frame: within 12 months
Risk of opioid misuse with the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain Revised (SOAPPR). The Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised (SOAPP-R) is a 24-item self-report questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0 to 24 that is used to predict risk of aberrant medication-related behaviors among chronic pain patients, with higher scores indicating higher risk of aberrant behaviors.
within 12 months
Current Opioid misuse measure (COMM) surveys
Time Frame: within 12 months
Current opioid misuse measures with the Current Opioid misuse measure (COMM) surveys. The COMM is a 17-item self-report measure with total scores ranging from 0 to 68 that is used to identify risk of opioid misuse among chronic pain patients, with higher scores indicating higher risk of opioid misuse.
within 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity with Brief Pain inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: within 12 months
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain intensity scale is a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale used to assess a patient's pain intensity, with 0 being no pain and 10 being pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicate higher pain intensity.
within 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chinwe Nwaneshiudu, ICAHN School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Immediately following publication. No end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ('learned intermediary') identified for this purpose.

For individual participant data meta-analysis.

Proposals should be directed to chinwe.nwaneshiudu@mountsinai.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data are available for 5 years at a third-party website (TBD)

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Back Pain

Clinical Trials on No Intervention

Subscribe