- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06290661
Clinical Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.
Prospective, Multicentre, Randomised Withdrawal Design of a Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation System for Patients With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate safety and efficacy of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- The efficacy of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain
- The safety of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain Participants are going to undergo procedure that implant peripheral nerve stimulation electrode produced by Jiangsu CED Medtech Co., Ltd. Then the subjects, whose VAS scores decrease more 30% than baseline level, are classified into two groups randomly. One of the group receiving active stimulation called trial group and another receiving placebo stimulation called control group. All subjects are required to make their own subjects' pain diary to record VSA score before and after implantation until at the end of follow-up. Also, participants are asked to report use of analgesic medications, number of awakenings and adverse events.
Researchers will compare pain scores between the two groups to see if peripheral nerve stimulation is effective to patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The investigators divide study process into 3 main periods called enrollment/baseline period, treatment period and follow-up period. The treatment period is classified into test period, randomized withdrawal period and observation period further.
- Enrollment/baseline period This study will be conducted at four clinical trial sites in China with 3 to 6 subjects included in the pretest and the formal trial planned to enroll 56 subjects. All subjects enter screening process after signing the informed consent form (ICF) approved by the ethics committee. Subjects are enrolled who meet inclusion criteria and do not meet any exclusion criteria. Enrolled subjects will undergo vital signs, physical examination, laboratory tests, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain for at least 4 days, Neuropathic Pain Scale (DN4), and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) as part of the screening period assessment prior to electrode implantation.
Treatment period 2.1 Implantation of devices Enrolled subjects are implanted with the percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation system, which was parameterized by the investigator via a programmable controller. Subjects are provided with a "Transcutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Remote Control Instruction Manual" to guide them in the proper operation and use of the system.
2.2 Test period Investigators will adjust stimulation parameters and record VAS score under different parameters conditions. The enrolled subjects are provided 1 to 5 stimulation therapy patterns parameterized by investigators after the test.
Then the subjects receive continuous stimulation with parameterized patterns of 7 (±3) days and VAS scores are be recorded every day of 7 days. Subjects will enter next stage if their VAS scores decrease more than 30% from baseline level or withdraw the trial as reduction less than 30% and devices are removed.
2.3 Randomized withdrawal period Subject will be classified into random group. One of the group receiving active stimulation called trial group and another receiving placebo stimulation called control group. Both of two groups are performed stimulation in the next 7 days. The subjects of control group will get active stimulation again as the VAS scores back to and maintain 2 days at baseline level. VAS scores will be recorded every day during this period.
2.4 Observation period The devices are on work until 28th day after the implantation in trial group; stimulators are turned on after randomized withdrawal period until 28th day after the implantation in control group.
All subjects have electrode leads removed on day 28 of implantation or at early withdrawal.
- Follow-up period Investigators will begin follow up as the removal of electrode leads or on the day 28 of implantation. Indicators including VAS score will be evaluated and recorded to assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation during follow-up.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Dong Yang, PHD
- Phone Number: 86 13871230491
- Email: dongyang118@sina.com
Study Locations
-
-
Hubei
-
Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430022
- Recruiting
- Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
-
Contact:
- Dong Yang, PHD
- Phone Number: 86 13871230491
- Email: dongyang118@sina.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- 18 years old and above, male or female
- Diagnosed by trained clinical doctors as postherpetic neuralgia, which is an indication for peripheral nerve stimulation therapy;
- Assess the damage or disease of the peripheral sensory system through the four questions of Douleur Neuropathy before surgery;
- The subject has received conventional treatment but the efficacy is poor, or cannot tolerate the side effects of conventional treatment;
- Visual analogue scale for pain within 24 hours before surgery ≥ 5;
- The subjects are able to understand the purpose of this study, have sufficient compliance with the research treatment, and are willing to sign an informed consent form;
Exclusion criteria:
- Subjects who need to receive both radio frequency modulation and intrathecal drug infusion treatment simultaneously;
- Subjects who are known to have cardiac implants (pacemakers or defibrillators) or other implantable neural stimulators (spinal cord stimulators or deep brain stimulators, etc.);
- Subjects with severe psychological and/or mental disorders and/or non therapeutic drug dependence;
- Subjects expected to undergo MRI examination within 30 days after PNS implantation;
- Expected to be discharged within 48 hours or less;
- Target nerve damage or muscle defects in known pain areas;
- Subjects who are known to be allergic to skin contact materials (tape or adhesive);
- Allergy to anesthetics such as lidocaine;
- Concomitant severe heart disease, liver disease, kidney disease, respiratory system disease, and coagulation dysfunction;
- Pregnant women, lactating women, or women planning to have children within the next three months;
- Subjects who have participated in any other clinical trial, or who may participate in any other trial after enrollment;
- Other situations that the researcher deems unsuitable for participation in this clinical trial
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Participants receiving active electrostimulation after implantation procedure
Twenty-eight participants (anticipated) from different 4 hospital in China whose mean VAS scores decreased more than 30% compared with baseline scores after electrode implantation.
They will still receive electrostimulation therapy during randomized withdrawal period.
|
Maintain the electrical stimulation state, and according to the patient's feeling to set the appropriate stimulation parameter range (pain relief and no obvious numbness and discomfort), the programme will be written into the patient's self-control remote control, by the patient according to their own pain situation for the independent control of the stimulation current.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Participants receiving placebo electrostimulation after implantation procedure
Twenty-eight participants (anticipated) from different 4 hospital in China whose mean VAS scores decreased more than 30% compared with baseline scores after electrode implantation.
The electrostimulation of them will be turned off during randomized withdrawal period.
|
No actual electrostimulation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in mean pain visual analogue scale VAS scores between trial and control groups in the randomised withdrawal period
Time Frame: every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period)
|
Researchers will collect visual analogue scale scores of 7 days after the implantation of peripheral nerve stimulation electrode to calculate mean scores of 4 days before randomized withdrawal and evaluate the difference in pain improvement of peripheral nerve stimulation between the two groups (trial and control group) by analyzing the mean change in VAS scores during randomized withdrawal period.
|
every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period)
|
|
Visual simulation assessment scale collects pain scores after peripheral electrode placement
Time Frame: Every day from 7 to 28 days after electrode implantation, as well as the 14th day after electrode removal
|
Researchers collected daily pain scores from the day of peripheral nerve stimulation electrode implantation until removal using the VAS pain scale, as well as pain scores on the 14th day after electrode removal.
|
Every day from 7 to 28 days after electrode implantation, as well as the 14th day after electrode removal
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of subjects whose pain relief more than 30%
Time Frame: Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period)
|
The VAS scores recorded in pain diary by participants during randomized withdrawal period decreased more 30% than baseline period.
|
Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period)
|
|
Proportion of subjects of ideal pain state
Time Frame: Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period), every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period), and every day from 14 to 28 days after electrode implantation (observation period)
|
The VAS scores recorded in pain diary by participants during test period, randomized withdrawal period and observation period less than forty millimeters.
|
Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period), every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period), and every day from 14 to 28 days after electrode implantation (observation period)
|
|
Sleep-related assessment after electrostimulation
Time Frame: Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period), every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period), and every day from 14 to 28 days after electrode implantation (observation period)
|
The number of awakenings in sleep diary by participants during test period, randomized withdrawal period and observation period.
|
Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period), every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period), and every day from 14 to 28 days after electrode implantation (observation period)
|
|
Change of life quality after electrostimulation
Time Frame: 4 days before electrode implantation, 7, 14, 21, 28 days after electrode implantation, and 14 days after electrode removal.
|
The subjects will be asked to fulfill the Mos 36-item Short Form Health Survey with assistance of clinical physician.
|
4 days before electrode implantation, 7, 14, 21, 28 days after electrode implantation, and 14 days after electrode removal.
|
|
Analgesic medications
Time Frame: Every day from 4 days before electrode implantation to 14 days after electrode removal.
|
Participants themselves record the analgesic medications of name, dosage, numbers, routine and duration after peripheral nerve stimulation.
|
Every day from 4 days before electrode implantation to 14 days after electrode removal.
|
|
Stability of external assistant devices
Time Frame: Every day from the 1st to 28th day after electrode implantation, as well as the 14th day after electrode removal.
|
The stability is assessed with failure rate which defined as number of failures divided by total number of uses.
|
Every day from the 1st to 28th day after electrode implantation, as well as the 14th day after electrode removal.
|
|
Questionnaire survey equipment satisfaction
Time Frame: On the first day of electrode implantation and the day of electrode removal (remove the electrode 28 days after surgery).
|
A questionnaire survey (0-10 points, 0 points very dissatisfied, 10 points very satisfied) was conducted for each surgeon on the ease of operation of the product and the reasons for dissatisfaction were recorded; a questionnaire survey (0-10 points, 0 points very dissatisfied, 10 points very satisfied) was conducted for each subject on the comfort and ease of use of the equipment and the reasons for dissatisfaction were recorded.
|
On the first day of electrode implantation and the day of electrode removal (remove the electrode 28 days after surgery).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gilmore C, Ilfeld B, Rosenow J, Li S, Desai M, Hunter C, Rauck R, Kapural L, Nader A, Mak J, Cohen S, Crosby N, Boggs J. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic neuropathic postamputation pain: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jun;44(6):637-645. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100109. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
- Mobbs RJ, Nair S, Blum P. Peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain. J Clin Neurosci. 2007 Mar;14(3):216-21; discussion 222-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.11.007.
- Al-Jehani H, Jacques L. Peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic neurogenic pain. Prog Neurol Surg. 2011;24:27-40. doi: 10.1159/000323017. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
- Weiner RL, Reed KL. Peripheral neurostimulation for control of intractable occipital neuralgia. Neuromodulation. 1999 Jul;2(3):217-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.1999.00217.x.
- Slavin KV. Peripheral nerve stimulation for neuropathic pain. Neurotherapeutics. 2008 Jan;5(1):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.11.005.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UHCT-IEC-SOP-016-03-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Trigeminal Neuralgia
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalBeijing Ditan Hospital; Beijing Xiaotangshan Hospital; Beijing Fangshan District... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingPostherpetic; Neuralgia, Trigeminal (Etiology)China
-
University of AlbertaRecruitingTrigeminal Neuralgia (TN)Canada
-
Alexandria UniversityNot yet recruitingHigh-intensity Laser Therapy Versus Low Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Trigeminal NeuralgiaTrigeminal NeuralgiaEgypt
-
Kriya Therapeutics, Inc.RecruitingRP-008 in Combination With Daily Oral Varenicline for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia (RELIEF)Trigeminal NeuralgiaCanada
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleNot yet recruiting
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Abbasi Shaheed HospitalActive, not recruitingTrigeminal NeuralgiaPakistan
-
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityYueyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineNot yet recruiting
-
University of FloridaFacial Pain Research FoundationCompleted
-
Klinikum Klagenfurt am WörtherseeUniversity of KlagenfurtCompletedGlossopharyngeal Neuralgia | Trigeminal Neuralgia, Idiopathic | Postherpetic; Neuralgia, Trigeminal (Etiology) | Atypical Facial PainAustria
Clinical Trials on Active electrostimulation
-
University of AlcalaCompletedPelvic Floor DisordersSpain
-
Rennes University HospitalCompletedChronic Renal Failure (CRF)France
-
Tatiane Gomes de AraujoUnknownOveractive Bladder | Parkinson DiseaseBrazil
-
Hospital de TerrassaUnknown
-
Saliwell Ltd.McGill University; Charite University, Berlin, Germany; University of Brasilia; Indiana University and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalRecruitingAtrophy, MuscularBrazil
-
Janaina Mayer de Oliveira NunesTerminatedUrinary Bladder, Overactive
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompletedFacioscapulohumeral Muscular DystrophyFrance
-
Centro de Atenção ao Assoalho PélvicoRecruitingWomen | Urgent Urinary Incontinence | Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation | Bladder HyperactiveBrazil
-
Laval UniversityCompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Canada