Effect of Limb Length Ratio on Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Outcomes (CLIMB II Study) (CLIMBII)

March 18, 2026 updated by: Salvador Navarrete
The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial comparing BP and roux limb lengths measuring 30 and 15% respectively of patient's total small bowel length versus current standard practice using fixed lengths. The findings would provide further insight into feasibility of standardizing RYGB limb lengths and optimizing resultant weight loss and metabolic effects. The investigators hypothesize RYGB with ratio-adjusted limb lengths (aRYGB) will result in higher total weight loss and resolution of metabolic syndrome comorbidities, including diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension compared to standard fixed-length RYGB (sRYGB). The study will also utilize the Short Form Rand 36-Item Health Survey (SF36) to determine differences in postoperative quality of life metrics.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study will be a prospective, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 recruitment allocation ratio. Patients will be randomized to Standard fixed-length RYGB (sRYGB) or ratio-adjusted limb lengths (aRYGB) once the total small bowel length (TSBL) is fully counted intraoperatively.

sRYGB will serve as the control group which will utilize BP and roux limb lengths of 100cm and 100cm, respectively. For the treatment group, aRYGB will incorporate a BP limb length measuring 30% and a roux limb of 15% of total small bowel length each.

Outcomes to be investigated:

Specific Aim 1: To determine significantly increased Total Weight Loss (TWL) after aRYGB compared to sRYGB in morbidly obese patients Given current understanding that weight loss after RYGB is mediated, at least in part, by a malabsorptive process, the investigators hypothesize that TWL will be greater after aRYGB versus sRYGB. As per standard of care at our institute, routine postoperative follow-up in the multidisciplinary Bariatric clinic will occur every 6 months (± 14 days) or more frequently as clinically indicated for the first two years postoperatively followed by yearly thereafter. Weight will be recorded in kilograms and a BMI will be calculated by the ratio of patient weight in kilograms over patient height in meters squared. Postoperative TWL will then be measured postoperatively at 6, 12, 24, 60 months from surgery.

Specific Aim 2: To compare rates of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) resolution between aRYGB Vs SRYGB by DM subgroup analysis Of the many metabolic changes that occur after bariatric surgery, one of the most salient effects include a rapid and effective resolution of DM. This has been extensively studied in context of various bariatric surgeries, including RYGB by our institution as previously described by the STAMPEDE trial. Significant reduction of HbA1C and improvement in insulin sensitivity was noted as early as six to 12 months postoperatively. As such, this study proposes measurement of the following two metrics at 6, 12, 24, 60 months postoperatively: 1) proportion of subjects achieving HbA1C less than or equal to 6.5%; and, 2) proportion of subjects able to wean and/or discontinue glycemic control medications.

Specific Aim 3: To investigate the relative postoperative efficacy of aRYGB compared to sRYGB on alleviating metabolic syndrome in morbid obesity Metabolic syndrome is a constellation of diagnoses including Hypertension (HTN) and Hyperlipidemia (HLD), which posit significant risk of medical comorbidities such as DM, coronary disease, and strokes. As such, addressing these conditions in morbidly obese patients confers a significant health benefit and decreases overall morbidity. This secondary outcome will be measured by comparing pre- versus postoperative serum lipid levels and proportion of patients requiring less antihypertensives 6, 12, 24, 60 months postoperatively.

Specific Aim 4: To investigate the presence of postoperative vitamin and nutritional deficiencies between the groups.

These secondary outcomes will be addressed comparing the vitamin levels between the groups at 6, 12, 24, 60 months postoperatively.

Additional outcomes proposed include evaluation of postoperative quality of life as captured by the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite-Clinical Trials (IWQOL-Lite-CT) survey as validated and effectively used in previous investigative bariatric studies. Responses will be tracked and obtained preoperatively and at various postoperative time points including Post-Operative Day (POD) 30 (± 15 days) and POD 365 (± 90 days). The investigators will furthermore track postoperative complications and adverse events, as measured by the Comprehensive Complications Index in addition to instances where additional bariatric surgical interventions are pursued.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

262

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Salvador Navarrete, MD
  • Phone Number: 2162199211
  • Email: navarrs@ccf.org

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Recruiting
        • Cleveland Clinic
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • morbidly obese patients (defined by BMI between 40 and 60).
  • Patient who understands and accepts the need for a long-term follow-up.
  • Patient who agrees to be included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • individuals unable to understand and sign a written consent form
  • patients with history of previous bariatric surgery procedures
  • presence of a severe and evolutive life threatening pathology unrelated to obesity
  • previous gastric or small bowel resection
  • active cancer
  • pregnancy or desired to be pregnant during the study
  • mentally unbalanced patients under supervision or guardianship, patient unable to give consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: aRYGB
BP and roux limb lengths measuring 30% and 15% respectively of patient's total small bowel length.
Biliopancreatic limb and roux limb lengths measuring 30 and 15% respectively of patient's total small bowel length in RYGB
Active Comparator: sRYGB
Standard fixed-length RYGB
Biliopancreatic limb and roux limb lengths measuring 30 and 15% respectively of patient's total small bowel length in RYGB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine change in TWL after aRYGB compared to sRYGB in morbidly obese patients
Time Frame: 6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery
Measured in kilograms
6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare rates of DM resolution between aRYGB Vs sRYGB by DM subgroup analysis
Time Frame: 6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery
Measured by subjects achieving HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5% and subjects able to wean and/or discontinue glycemic control medications
6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery
To investigate postoperative efficacy rates of aRYGB compared to sRYGB on alleviating metabolic syndrome in morbid obesity
Time Frame: 6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery
Measured by a change in serum lipid levels and subjects requiring less antihypertensives
6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery
To investigate the presence of postoperative vitamin and nutritional deficiencies between the groups.
Time Frame: 6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery
6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Salvador Navarrete, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 11, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 11, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Morbid Obesity

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Subscribe