Development of Digital Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis: Validation Study 2 (DreaMS_VS2)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Diagnosis is established by clinical assessment of persons with MS (PwMS), in combination with imaging and body fluid assessments. Treatment decisions in MS are mainly based on periodic monitoring of disease activity and progression through clinical and imaging assessments.

The predictive and prognostic value of currently used assessments to individualize treatment decisions is still very limited. Emerging digital measures have the potential to provide granular health status measurements that would allow monitoring MS disease activity and progression continuously and remotely, in real-world settings, with minimal disruption of patients' life.

Using the investigators' self developed dreaMS software program the investigators previously identified digital biomarkers (DB) that hold promise to provide detailed and accurate assessments of MS-related health status and disease progression to complement traditional clinical, imaging, or body fluid assessments.

This international, observational study aims to evaluate and validate the generalizability of these DB across different languages and cultural settings to provide DB that are helpful for patient care, research, and regulatory decisions. Beyond this, the processes and data structures created for this study are intended to establish a collaborative research platform for subsequent studies, including pragmatic trials, promoting new long-term international academic collaborations.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. Focal demyelination and diffuse neurodegeneration in the gray and white matter of the brain and spinal cord lead to decreased physical and cognitive functioning and disability.

Diagnosis is established by clinical assessment of persons with MS (PwMS), including taking their history and neurologic examination, in combination with imaging and body fluid assessments. Treatment decisions in MS are based on continuous monitoring of MS disease activity and progression through clinical and imaging assessments, while the role of body fluid assessments is not yet universally established. The predictive and prognostic value of these currently used assessments to individualize treatment decisions is still very limited. New and more reliable measures are needed, especially indicators of disease progression, which allow to personalize therapies and care.

With the digitization of healthcare, new opportunities are emerging to provide quasi-continuous and granular health status measurements as digital measures. Such digital measures may allow to monitor MS disease activity and progression more informatively than the only episodical traditional assessments. Digital health technologies allow to remotely capture dynamic fluctuating functions and symptoms in real world settings with minimal disruption of patients' life and usual care.

The investigators developed the dreaMS software program that includes app-based interactions with the patients, patient-reported information via surveys, and continuous monitoring through sensors. In a previous study (NCT04413032), which evaluated the feasibility and acceptance of using our dreaMS software program, we identified digital biomarkers (DB) that are relevant for PwMS. These DB are evaluated and validated in an ongoing study including a larger population of PwMS in Switzerland (NCT05009160).

This international, observational study aims to evaluate and validate the generalizability of these DB across different languages and cultural settings to provide DB that are helpful for patient care, research, and regulatory decisions. Beyond this, the processes and data structures created for this study are intended to establish a collaborative research platform for subsequent studies, including pragmatic trials, promoting new long-term international academic collaborations.

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tyrol
      • Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria, 6020
        • Innsbruck Medical University, Department of Neurology
    • Vienna
      • Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Vienna Medical University, Department of Neurology
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Weill Institute, Department of Neurology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Persons with MS from the neurological outpatient clinics in the participating centers (European and North American).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18
  • Diagnosed with MS according to the revised McDonald criteria 2017, all clinical forms inclusive (CIS, RRMS, SPMS, PPMS)
  • In possession of a Healios+Me app-compatible smartphone (iOS/Android)
  • Corrected close visual acuity of ≥0.5
  • Hand motor skills sufficient for using a smartphone
  • Ability and intention to follow the study procedures
  • Sufficient knowledge of the language for the specific country
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

  • NA

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of the digital features with the respective measurements of the clinical reference tests
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Spearman correlation coefficients higher than 0.4 (lower bound of 95% confidence interval) are considered relevant. All scheduled pairs of measurements collected during the study will be used. As the yearly observations of a patient are not independent, standard confidence intervals cannot be used. Therefore, a bootstrap approach will be used to determine a 95% confidence interval for the Spearman correlations (where data will be resampled on the patient level).
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
The ability of measurements of the changes in the digital biomarkers over the two-year follow-up to predict worsening in the clinical reference test over the same period expressed as binary variables
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 months
The change of the digital biomarker over two years allows to distinguish patients experiencing a relevant worsening in the corresponding reference test over the same period from those who do not with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) larger than 0.6 (lower bound of 95% confidence interval).
Baseline and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The ability of the digital biomarker to detect worsening in other relevant reference test results creating converging evidence
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The ability of the digital biomarker to detect worsening in other relevant reference test results creating converging evidence
up to 24 months
The ability of the digital biomarker to detect worsening in standard assessments used for treatment of PwMS (clinical, imaging, body fluids)
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The ability of the digital biomarker to detect worsening in standard assessments used for treatment of PwMS (clinical, imaging, body fluids)
up to 24 months
The ability of the digital biomarker to detect change of Patient Reported Outcomes
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The ability of the digital biomarker to detect change of Patient Reported Outcomes
up to 24 months
The ability of the digital biomarker to detect occurrence of clinical and other meaningful events (relapses, PIRA, serious adverse events, hospitalizations, working capacity)
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The ability of the digital biomarker to detect occurrence of clinical and other meaningful events (relapses, PIRA, serious adverse events, hospitalizations, working capacity)
up to 24 months
The relationship of the digital biomarkers with imaging and body fluid markers
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The relationship of the digital biomarkers with imaging and body fluid markers
up to 24 months
The relationship of the digital biomarkers with Patient Reported Outcomes
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The relationship of the digital biomarkers with Patient Reported Outcomes
up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ludwig Kappos, Prof., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Subscribe