Assessing Comorbidities in Epilepsy Using Eye Movement Recordings (ACER)

October 13, 2025 updated by: Rachel Kuperman, Eysz, Inc.
This study wants to make it easier to find kids with a type of epilepsy called childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) who might have problems with ongoing seizures and thinking. Right now, doctors use tests that can be expensive and take a long time. Eysz is developing a system that looks at how kids move their eyes which might help find CAE more quickly and accurately. This study will compare Eysz with the usual tests to see if it can predict seizures and thinking problems in kids with CAE. The goal is to find these problems earlier and help kids do better in school and life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study addresses the challenges in managing childhood absence epilepsy (CAE), a condition that poses risks of injury and cognitive issues despite normal intelligence levels. Current management relies heavily on subjective reporting and costly, time-consuming tests such as neuropsychiatric assessments and EEGs. However, these methods often underestimate seizure burden and neurocognitive comorbidities, leading to missed opportunities for early intervention. Eysz, a novel system analyzing eye movements, has shown promise in identifying CAE features through passive analysis. Building upon this, the study aims to validate Eysz against established tests like EEGs and questionnaires to develop a rapid and objective tool for identifying CAE in children at risk of poor outcomes due to ongoing seizures or cognitive issues. By evaluating eye-movement features in comparison with hyperventilation, EEG results, and various assessments, the goal is to enable earlier diagnosis, quicker attainment of seizure freedom, and identification of at-risk children who may benefit from interventions to improve cognitive outcomes during critical developmental periods.

The study will assess features such as saccade frequency, fixation duration, and eye blink frequency measured by the Eysz system and correlate them with clinical outcomes. By improving the accuracy and efficiency of CAE diagnosis, the study aims to reduce the burden on patients and caregivers while enhancing overall treatment outcomes. Additionally, the findings may contribute to a better understanding of the relationship between eye movements and neurological conditions, potentially opening avenues for future research and intervention strategies. Through collaboration with clinicians and researchers, this study seeks to address the unmet needs in CAE management and ultimately improve the quality of life for affected children and their families.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Children's Hospital Orange County
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A diverse group of children (4-12 years) with childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) and healthy controls will be recruited from epilepsy centers in North Carolina, California, and Colorado. Inclusion criteria involve confirmed CAE diagnosis or healthy controls, absence of other neurological disorders, and various socio-economic backgrounds. Exclusion criteria include conditions or medications affecting eye movements or cognition.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Diagnosis of Childhood Absence Epilepsy by Treating Neurologist or a Healthy control Fluent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

History of subarachnoid hemorrhage, sickle cell anemia, recent cerebrovascular accident or myocardial infarction, significant cardiopulmonary disease, active asthma, known aneurysm, known moyamoya disease, or pregnancy.

Known diagnosis of strabismus or amblyopia Any vision abnormalities that prevent the participant from viewing the screen clearly People who have a history of generalized tonic clonic convulsions To participate as a healthy control the participant must have no personal history of epilepsy, ADHD or other developmental disorder, no first degree relatives with the above diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Children with CAE or Controls
Pediatric Epilepsy Side Effect Questionnaire Continuous Performance Test Children's Sleep Questionnaire Anxiety/Depression Screening Eye tracking during active tasks- saccade/antisaccade task, and passive tasks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eye Movements to Diagnose CAE
Time Frame: 1 year
Use machine learning algorithms based on eye movement feature analysis (e.g., saccade frequency and velocity, fixation duration, and eye blink frequency) to identify people with CAE, and those with ongoing seizure activity with > 75% sensitivity and specificity.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eye Movements to Diagnose Attention challenges
Time Frame: 1 year
Use machine learning algorithms based on eye movement feature analysis to identify people with epilepsy whose CPT score indicates attention deficits and those with PESQ score > 34 (1 standard deviation from mean) with > 75% sensitivity and specificity.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Childhood Absence Epilepsy

Subscribe