Mobile Mental Health Stigma Reduction Intervention Among Black Adults

April 15, 2026 updated by: Aderonke Bamgbose Pederson, Massachusetts General Hospital

Design and Feasibility of a Mobile Mental Health Stigma Reduction Intervention Among Black Adults With Depression and Anxiety

Major depressive and anxiety disorders are highly prevalent in the general population and are a leading cause of disability. Black adults have a high burden of depression and anxiety. This study aims to assess a self- administered video-based intervention to reduce mental illness stigma and medical mistrust among Black adults with moderate to severe depression or anxiety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Major depressive and anxiety disorders affect 57.3 million adults in the U.S. These disorders are also highly stigmatized. Stigma refers to negative attitudes or beliefs about mental illness, or negative behaviors directed toward persons with mental illness (PWMI) is a leading and fundamental cause of health inequities.

The efficacy and precision of anti- stigma interventions to improve mental health outcomes among underserved Black adults are grossly limited and represent a critical public health gap. Studies show stigma compounds disabilities related to the primary symptoms of mental illness and increases morbidity and premature mortality related to mental illness. Compared with white adults, Black adults with mental illness have more chronic disease, and more severe illness at presentation. Meta-analyses have consistently shown that both face-to-face and video-based contact with individuals with mental illness can reduce stigma. Recent studies that distinguished contact delivery showed effect size for video-based contact to be comparable to face-to-face contact. Contact interventions, which are premised on the idea that positive and voluntary contact with PWMI can effectively reduce mental illness stigma, are aimed at reducing stigma and improving health outcomes.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a self-administered, video-based mobile app intervention aimed at reducing mental illness stigma among Black adults. Black adults with moderate to severe depression or anxiety will be recruited to participate in the Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three arms: two video-based intervention arms and one waitlist control arm. The video-based intervention will include first-hand lived experience stories of mental health and one's recovery journey.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. If you identify as Black American or Black immigrant
  2. Experience or been diagnosed with depression and/or anxiety
  3. Age 18-45 years
  4. Own a smartphone with internet access
  5. Have not seen a psychiatrist or therapist in the last 12 months or have not been in routine healthcare
  6. English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Visual, hearing, voice, or motor impairments that would prevent engagement in study procedures,
  2. Diagnosis of psychotic disorder or severe suicidality for which participation would be inappropriate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Video Intervention 1
The video intervention #1 will involve videos of patients describing personal narratives of mental illness, treatment and recovery, and will be delivered over 4 weeks (with two booster sessions in week 6 and 12). Assessments will be completed over 12 months from date of randomization.
A self-administered video-based mobile app with narratives on mental illness. The content of the videos consists of individuals sharing their personal experiences with depression and anxiety.
Active Comparator: Video Intervention 2
The video intervention #2 will involve videos of patients describing personal narratives of mental illness, treatment and recovery, and will be delivered over 4 weeks (with two booster sessions in week 6 and 12). Assessments will be completed over 12 months from date of randomization.
A self-administered video-based mobile app with narratives on mental illness. The content of the videos consists of individuals sharing their personal experiences with depression and anxiety.
Placebo Comparator: Waitlist Video Intervention 3
After the completion of the 6-month waitlist period, the experimental video intervention will be provided. The intervention will involve videos of patients describing personal narratives of mental illness, treatment and recovery, and will be delivered over 4 weeks (with two booster sessions in week 6 and 12). The intervention offered after the waitlist period will follow video intervention 1 (experimental arm).
An experimental self-administered video-based mobile app with narratives on mental illness after the waitlist period has been completed. The content of the videos consists of individuals sharing their personal experiences with depression and anxiety.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Inventory of Costs in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders
Time Frame: 12 months post intervention
An adapted version to evaluate the utilization of mental health care services. The self-report questionnaire includes single item questions that will be used such as, "How many appointments have you attended at a Mental Health Care Institution in the past 3 months? Or at another mental health treatment facility?" and "In the past 3 months, how many appointments have you had with a psychologist, psychotherapist, or psychiatrist at a hospital?". Response options are qualitative: "no appointments" or providing the number of appointments attended. The test-retest reliability based on Cohen's Kappa was 0.649. Construct validity was assessed through the number of contacts recorded in the registration data, with a high correlation (ρ = 0.791).
12 months post intervention
Release of Information Form
Time Frame: 12 months post intervention
The release of information form will be used to objectively measure the utilization of mental healthcare services by identifying visits made to these services. More or less visits is dependent on patient needs and does not have an intrinsic positive or negative value.
12 months post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reported and Intended Behavior Scale
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and up to 12 months post-intervention
The Reported and Intended Behavior Scale includes 4 questions on each of the reported and intended behaviors. Items 1-4 are binary, "yes" or "no". Items 5-8 are evaluated using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 20. Higher scores indicate less stigma (less desire for social distance) and lower scores indicate higher stigma (more desire for social distance). The test-retest reliability was 0.75, and internal consistency, based on Cronbach's alpha among items 5-8, was 0.85.
Pre-intervention and up to 12 months post-intervention
Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and up to 12 months post-intervention
The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness is a 29-item measure with subscales that assess enacted and internalized stigma. Each item is evaluated using a four-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from a minimum of 29 to a maximum of 116. The higher scores indicate more internalized stigma. The original Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness reported test-retest reliability of 0.92.
Pre-intervention and up to 12 months post-intervention
The Group Based Medical Mistrust Scale
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and up to 12 months post-intervention
The Group Based Medical Mistrust Scale is a 12 -item scale to measure race-based medical mistrust; it has strong validity and reliability. Each item is evaluated using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from a minimum of 12 to a maximum of 60. Higher scores indicate greater medical mistrust.The Cronbach alpha for the full measure in previous studies was α=0.87-0.88. The total score and its three subscales were positively correlated with avoidance of health care (total score: p<0.0001; r=0.344).
Pre-intervention and up to 12 months post-intervention
Group Help Seeking Questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and up to 12 months post-intervention
The Group Help Seeking Questionnaire contains 10-items repeated for two problems (personal emotional and suicidal emotions). Each item is evaluated using a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). The total score ranges from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 140. Higher scores indicate higher help seeking intentions. Cronbach alpha for the full measure in previous studies was α=0.91. The perceived quality of previous mental health care was positively related to intentions to seek help from a mental health professional for personal-emotional problems, rs(55) = 0.51, p < 0.001, and suicidal thoughts, rs(54) = 0.57, p < 0.001.
Pre-intervention and up to 12 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aderonke Pederson, MD, Massachuessets General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Video Intervention 1

Subscribe