- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06317441
The Safety And Efficacy Of A Probiotic Intervention On Lactulose Hydrogen Breath Test-Positive Patients And Related Gastrointestinal Symptoms
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The goal of this double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study is to evaluate whether two different doses of a probiotic formulation may have effect on gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as gut and small intestine microbiota, in participats suffering from SIBO. The two probiotic doses will be compared to a placebo.
The main research questions to be answered by this study are related to:
- Probiotic effect on bloating and abdominal distension.
- Probiotic effect on other gastrointestinal symptoms.
- Probiotic effect on incidence of SIBO.
- Probiotic effect on small intestine and gut microbiota.
The study will include a 2 month intervention with the investigational products and assessments will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention, end-of-intervention, and follow-up period, with the exception of SIBO diagnosis, which will be conducted at baseline and at follow-up.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Gwen Duytschaever, PhD
- Phone Number: 8664934633
- Email: clinical@nimblesci.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Isaac Wong, MBT
- Phone Number: 8664934633
- Email: clinical@nimblesci.com
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2L 1Y8
- Recruiting
- Nimble Science
-
Principal Investigator:
- Christopher N Andrews, MD
-
Contact:
- Gwen Duytschaever
- Phone Number: 8664934633
- Email: Clinical@nimblesci.com
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Matthew Woo, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18-65 years old at the inclusion of the study, both female and male subjects.
- Signed Informed Consent; willing and able to comply with study procedures.
- Willing to maintain their diet and physical activity levels during the study.
- Able to swallow a size-00 capsule (23mm length and 9mm width).
- Participants with at least one of the following Rome IV diagnoses: FABD, functional diarrhea, IBS-M, or IBS-D.
- Baseline weekly average of worst daily (in past 24 hours) abdominal bloating/distension score of >= 3.0 on a 0-to-10-point scale.
- Participants with abnormal LHBT following the North American Consensus recommendations (A rise in hydrogen of ≥20 ppm by 90 min).
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of less than three (3) bowel movements per week.
- With the diagnosis of IBS-C.
- Prior gastrointestinal disease, surgery, or abdominal or pelvic radiation treatment which, in the Investigator's opinion, would lead to intestinal structuring or obstruction with a risk of capsule non-excretion, including, e.g., achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis, any IBD, or previous esophageal, gastric, small intestinal, or colonic surgery. Appendectomy or cholecystectomy more than 3 months before the screening visit is acceptable.
- Persons with central venous catheters.
- History of known structural gastrointestinal abnormalities such as structures or fistulas leading to mechanical obstruction.
- Known history abdominal radiation treatment.
Use of any medications in the week prior to the screening study visit, unless part of regular treatment, that could substantially alter gastrointestinal motor function (e.g., opioids, anticholinergics, or GLP-1 analogues); laxative use is allowed if used less than 3 times a week and it is willing to keep unchanged in the week prior to the SIMBA capsule ingestions. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are allowed provided a wash-out period of 48 hours is respected before swallowing the SIMBA capsules and PPI treatment is resumed only 4 hours thereafter.
o Prokinetic use. Potential participants who are not using prokinetics to treat SIBO may be eligible after a 2-week washout period, and willing to not use prokinetics for the study duration.
- Unable to stop using laxatives or prokinetic medications for 4 days before the study procedure (BT). Laxatives can be resumed after the test is conducted.
- Organic motility disorder, including gastroparesis, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, systemic sclerosis, Ogilvie's syndrome.
- Celiac disease (treated or untreated).
- Any significant heart, liver, lung, kidney, blood, endocrine or nervous system disease, which in the opinion of the investigator, would adversely affect study safety or outcome.
- Cancer diagnosis or treatment within the past year (non-melanoma skin cancers are acceptable).
- Gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases, including ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, microscopic colitis.
- Participants with IBS presenting with alarm symptoms such as: rectal bleeding, unexplained weight loss, iron deficiency anemia, and nocturnal symptoms,
Participants over the age of 50 or older who have not had:
- a colon cancer screening by either a negative FIT or FOBT test within the last 2 years; OR
- a colonoscopy in the prior 10 years which was negative for colorectal cancer
- Epilepsy diagnosis.
- History or diagnosis of immunological diseases, infectious diseases or immune-compromised conditions, which in the opinion of the investigator, would adversely affect study safety or outcome. Such as, but not limited to, hepatitis, tuberculosis, HIV positive, Parkinson's, multiple sclerosis, AIDS, lymphoma, and long-term corticosteroid treatment.
- History of oropharyngeal dysphagia, or other swallowing disorder with a risk of capsule aspiration.
- Antibiotic use (except for topical use) ≤ 12 weeks prior to screening. Potential participants may be eligible once a 12-week washout is completed.
- Regular use of probiotics, prebiotics or synbiotics (including food and drinks containing added probiotics and/or probiotic yogurts with live, active cultures) within 1 month prior to screening. Potential participants may be eligible once a 1-month washout is completed.
- Any prior Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Planning to become pregnant.
- Alcohol or drug abuse.
- Allergy to the components present in the probiotic and placebo capsules.
- Are non-English speaking.
- Are scheduled for an MRI at any time during the study. Potential participants may be eligible to participate once their MRI procedure is completed.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control group (Placebo)
No probiotic dosage
|
|
|
Experimental: Probiotic (High dose)
A high dosage probiotic per capsule
|
The intervention consists of a probiotic either with a low or high dosage
|
|
Experimental: Probiotic (Low dose)
A low dosage probiotic per capsule
|
The intervention consists of a probiotic either with a low or high dosage
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in bloating/distension severity
Time Frame: From baseline to end of intervention (week 8).
|
The primary outcome will assess the changes in weekly median severity of bloating/distension, defined as pressure, fullness or sensation of increased girth with a daily assessment with an ordinal scale between probiotic groups and placebo.
|
From baseline to end of intervention (week 8).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Median bloating-free days
Time Frame: Each intervention week and follow up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
Median bloating-free days per week at each intervention week and follow up
|
Each intervention week and follow up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
|
Change in median bloating/distension severity
Time Frame: At all intervention weeks (with the exception of end-of-intervention, as described in the primary outcome) and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
Change in median bloating/distension severity assessed by an ordinal scale (0 no severity- 10 extreme severity) at all intervention weeks (with the exception of end-of-intervention, as described in the primary outcome)
|
At all intervention weeks (with the exception of end-of-intervention, as described in the primary outcome) and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
|
Change in abdominal discomfort/pain
Time Frame: At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline
|
Change in abdominal discomfort/pain assessed by an ordinal scale (0 no pain - 10 extreme pain)
|
At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline
|
|
Changes in gastrointestinal symptoms
Time Frame: At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
Changes in gastrointestinal symptoms assessed with GSRS
|
At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
|
Changes in stool frequency and consistency
Time Frame: At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
Changes in stool frequency and consistency assessed with the Bristol Stool Scale (scoring 1 watery - 7 hard)
|
At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
|
Changes in the quality of life
Time Frame: At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
Changes in the quality of life assessed with the Short Form (SF)-36 questionnaire
|
At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
|
Changes in reflux incidence and severity
Time Frame: At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
Changes in reflux incidence and severity assessed with the modified reflux symptoms (mRESQ)
|
At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
|
Changes in the severity of IBS symptoms
Time Frame: At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
Changes in the severity of IBS symptoms assessed with IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) questionnaire
|
At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
|
Recovery rate of the probiotic strain
Time Frame: At mid-intervention (week 4) end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
Recovery rate of the probiotic strain in small intestine and stool specimens
|
At mid-intervention (week 4) end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
|
Microbiome changes within small intestine, fecal and saliva samples
Time Frame: At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
Changes in the the bacterial populations with the small intestine, fecal and saliva microbiomes represented as a diversity ratio
|
At mid-intervention (week 4), end of intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline.
|
|
Investigation how the microbiome and SIBO associate with each other though bacterial population analyses.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Exploring the correlation of select bacterial populations with SIBO through analysis of the small intestine and fecal microbiomes using metagenomics methodologies.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Change in SIBO positivity rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Change in SIBO positivity rate assessed by glucose breath test
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Exploratory metabolomic analysis
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
To investigate whether certain metabolites present in the small intestine, fecal, saliva samples may be associated with the presence/absence of SIBO.
Using untargeted metabolomic methodologies.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Safety outcomes
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
To collect safety data on the probiotic formulation and the SIMBA capsule by monitoring adverse events throughout the study.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Exploratory: Quantifying the probiotic cell proportions
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Determine the proportion of probiotic cells in spore versus germinated form using qPCR methodologies
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- NIMCSF137
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth
-
Warsaw University of Life SciencesCompletedSmall Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth | SIBO | Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Syndrome (SIBO)Poland
-
Augusta UniversityCompletedColectomy | Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth | Small Intestinal Fungal Overgrowth
-
Envivo Bio IncRecruitingSmall Intestinal Bacterial OvergrowthUnited States
-
McMaster Children's HospitalThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenRecruitingSmall Intestinal Bacterial OvergrowthCanada
-
The Functional Gut ClinicCompletedSmall Intestinal Bacterial OvergrowthUnited Kingdom
-
Atrium InnovationsGenova Diagnostics; Dr. Nathan Morris, MDWithdrawnSmall Intestinal Bacterial OvergrowthUnited States
-
San Antonio Military Medical CenterUnknownSmall Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth
-
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University; West China Hospital; Second... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingSmall Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth
-
Augusta UniversityUnknownSmall Intestinal Bacterial OvergrowthUnited States
-
National University of Natural MedicineCompletedSmall Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth | Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Syndrome (SIBO)United States
Clinical Trials on Probiotic
-
King's College Hospital NHS TrustCompleted
-
Lallemand Health SolutionsRecruitingFocus is on Healthy SubjectsCanada
-
Fudan UniversityInner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., LtdCompletedObesity | AdiposityChina
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompleted
-
BiocodexCompletedAcute GastroenteritisArgentina
-
Fundació Sant Joan de DéuCompleted
-
University of LeedsUnknown
-
Centro Pediatrico Albina de PatinoCompletedAcute Gastroenteritis | Acute DiarrheaBolivia
-
Centros de Investigación de Nutrición y SaludNutribioticaCompletedFunctional ConstipationSpain
-
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical CentreUnknownHypertension | Obesity | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus | HyperlipidemiaMalaysia