Learning and Living With Wildfire Smoke

April 11, 2025 updated by: Savannah D'Evelyn, University of Washington

Learning and Living With Wildfire Smoke: Creating Air Clean Environments in Schools Through Youth Participatory Action Research

The proposed intervention in this Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) proposal will improve knowledge and awareness of the health impacts of air pollution exposure, will elevate the youth voice, improve youth self-efficacy and lead to behavior changes that would reduce exposure to air pollution in a high school setting. These outcomes will be accomplished through the introduction of a new air quality curriculum into science classes, and the establishment of an after-school air quality monitoring program.

All students enrolled in Food Science (Montrose High School), Intro to Agriculture (The STEAD School) and Environmental Science Academy (Grand Junction High School) will participate in the new air quality curriculum, as it will be built into the existing lesson plans. For the after-school monitoring program, the PI and participating teachers (Letters A and B) will recruit 10 to 15 students at each school to be involved in the Student Research Cohort (SRC). Information on this program and how to apply will be shared with students through their health and science classes, included in the school newsletter, and posted on billboards around the school. Students will be identified within the following inclusion criteria: 1) freshman or sophomores in high school and 2) participation in the air quality curriculum. New students will be recruited each year to keep a consistent group as students leave and/or graduate. New students will be brought up to speed by carry-over students, and each new year will represent a separate SRC dedicated to a specific goal.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Air Quality Curriculum: The goal of integrating a new curriculum into classrooms is to improve student knowledge on the health effects of air pollution, specifically of wildfire smoke. The curriculum was jointly designed by the PI and colleagues at CO Dept of Public Health and Environment to teach at the intersection of air pollution, citizen science and civic action and to create critical thinkers who understand they can impact air quality in their community. Students will learn research and air quality 101 (with time devoted specifically to wildfire smoke), learn to measure both their personal exposure to air pollutants and acute health outcomes of exposure, and will be taught the basics of sensors and of air quality monitoring networks. The PI will be available to assist in teaching any lessons as necessary.

YPAR Air Quality Monitoring Project: The goal of the SRC is to implement a student-designed and student-driven air quality monitoring study. Based on the knowledge they gained from the curriculum, and given access to outdoor, indoor, and personal monitoring devices, the SRC will pose research questions, design a study to answer these questions, and collect and analyze data to share with their school community.

Students will begin this portion of the project by developing research questions that will address air quality issues in each school community. The PI will support students in developing questions that would fill research gaps about: a) wildfire smoke versus other pollutant sources; b) indoor-outdoor infiltration; and c) exposure differences throughout the school building and or throughout a student's day. Once 3-5 questions have been developed, students will be given a list of materials (three-five indoor stationary monitors, one-two outdoor stationary monitor and five handheld mobile monitors), information about any constraints (Wi-Fi availability; facilities restrictions) and a manual for monitor setup. The manual will support students in placing monitors, teach them how to calibrate and maintain monitors, how to process data for QA-QC, and how to analyze monitor data. The SRC will then develop a research plan and place monitors in locations that will allow them to answer their research questions. Once the plan is solidified and approved by the PI, students will present their plan to school administrators and facilities staff to ensure feasibility of monitor placement. To encourage self-efficacy and engagement with the systems of power in their school community, the meeting to present their plan will be arranged by the students themselves. In this meeting, students will present the questions they wish to answer, their plan to do so, and ask for any assistance they may need from facilities (power sources) or IT (Wi-Fi access) in order to begin data collection.

Impact of student participation: The impact on students of the curriculum and involvement in the SRC will be separately evaluated to measure both student's content knowledge, self-efficacy and behavior through both qualitative and quantitative data collection.

To measure the impact of the curriculum quantitatively, a Likert-style survey will assess 1) content knowledge based on completion of the curriculum learning objectives, and 2) student self-efficacy using the Sociopolitical Control Scale (SPCS) for Youth. Content knowledge questions will ask students to rank the extent of understanding for each learning objective and the self-efficacy questions will use the established SPCS for youth to measure students' self-perceptions in two domains: 1) capacity to organize a group of people to achieve certain goals; and 2) ability to influence decisions in their community. Both the content knowledge and self-efficacy portions of the Likert-style survey will be given to all students participating in the curriculum before and after the curriculum lessons (beginning and end of semester). Qualitative data will also be collected via a reflective memo on student interactions and learning written at the end of every curriculum lesson by teachers. The PI will create a template for reflective memos to lessen the burden on teachers, and to ensure the memo is specific to both the learning objectives and the SPCS for youth.

A similar approach will be used to measure the impact of participation in the SRC. As all of the students participating in the SRC will have participated in the air quality curriculum, the quantitative assessment for this group will focus solely on self-efficacy and behavior change. The self-efficacy portions of the quantitative, Likert-style survey will be given to all SRC students at the beginning and end of each school year. Additionally, SRC-generated artifacts (notes and journals) will be collected continuously throughout the year for qualitative analysis.

An additional Likert-style survey will be given to all students (SRC and curriculum only students) in the final year of the grant to assess the impact of the curriculum and monitoring program on air-quality related behavior changes overall. The purpose of these surveys will be to evaluate content knowledge on the health effects of smoke exposure, as well as changes in individual and school-wide behaviors post-implementation of the intervention plan. This survey will be Likert-style and a combination of 1) a series of questions developed to assess comprehension of new knowledge specific to the intervention; and 2) validated questions from the 2007-2011 NHANES survey to evaluate behavior change specific to air quality. Questions include the following themes: mask use; time outdoors versus indoors; exercise schedule; transportation and air filtration.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

85

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • University of Washington

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Freshman and Sophomore students at Montrose High School in Montrose, Colorado, Grand Junction High School in Grand Junction, Colorado and the STEAD School in Commerce City, Colorado with the ability to participate for more than two years.
  • Teachers, Administrators and Staff at aforementioned high schools willing to participate for more than two years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Junior and Senior Students at the aforementioned schools (unable to participate for more than two years)
  • Teachers, Administrators and Staff at aforementioned high schools unwilling or unable to participate for more than two years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of students, staff, teacher and administrators with higher scores on a Likert-style questionnaire for content knowledge learning objectives.
Time Frame: Year 1 and 2
Improved Health Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice related to the health impacts of local air pollution across students, staff, teachers and administrators are measured pre and post involvement in an air quality curriculum intervention via a likert scale survey to measure predetermined learning objectives.
Year 1 and 2
Scores on Likert-style questionnaire to evaluate behavior change around air quality.
Time Frame: Year 3 and 4
A Likert-style survey will be given to all students to assess the impact of the curriculum and monitoring program on air-quality related behavior changes post-intervention. (The air quality intervention is to be designed by students as part of the project but could include interventions such as changes to filtration systems, an anti-idling or educational campaign.) The Likert-style survey will be validated questions from the 2007-2011 NHANES survey to evaluate behavior change specific to air quality. Questions include the following themes: mask use; time outdoors versus indoors; exercise schedule; transportation and air filtration.
Year 3 and 4
Change in student exposure to air pollution calculated through measurements of indoor particulate matter and indoor carbon dioxide.
Time Frame: Year 4 and 5
Indoor air quality levels (particulate matter and carbon dioxide) will be measured with indoor air quality sensors before and after each air quality intervention plan (such as changes to filtration systems, an anti-idling or educational campaign) has been implemented. Overall student exposure is calculated with approximate respiratory rates and time spent in each indoor location.
Year 4 and 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Savannah D'Evelyn, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 28, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 26, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00017745
  • K99ES034442 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Clinical Trials on Air Action Curriculum

Subscribe