Brief Problem-solving Intervention in Different Formats for the Prevention of Suicide in Adults Over 50 (SOLPROSU50+)

April 28, 2026 updated by: Fernando Lino Vázquez González, University of Santiago de Compostela

Efficacy of a Brief Poblem-solving Based Psychological Intervention Implemented in Different Formats for the Indicated Prevention of Suicide in Adults Over 50

Suicide represents a personal tragedy and an enormous global public health problem. One of the most vulnerable groups is adults 50 years and older. Despite this stage of life is particularly amenable to the implementation of targeted suicide prevention strategies, we have few studies of the efficacy of psychological interventions, those that do exist have methodological limitations, and none were implemented in formats other than face-to-face, which limits their accessibility. There is a need for brief psychological interventions that can be administered in both face-to-face and remote formats, do not require long training periods, and are effective in different contexts: for example, problem-solving therapy. The main objective of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of a brief problem-solving psychological intervention for targeted suicide prevention in people aged 50 years and older, administered in face-to-face, conference call, and smartphone app formats. A randomized controlled trial will be performed. Participants will be recruited through healthcare centers in the Autonomous Community of Galicia (Spain). To be included, participants must: (a) be at least 50 years old, (b) reside in Galicia, and (c) present suicidal ideation. Subjects will be excluded if they: (a) present serious mental health or medical disorders; (b) have begun receiving psychological or psychopharmacological treatment in the previous two months or are participating in other suicide prevention research; (c) do not have an appropriate mobile device or sufficient fluency to communicate in Spanish, or have problems that make it impossible to participate; or (d) plan to move in the next 18 months. At pre-intervention information will be collected on sociodemographic, family, personal history, current suicide risk and other clinical variables. 212 participants will be randomly assigned to (1) a problem-solving-based psychological intervention delivered face-to-face (PSPI-FF; experimental group 1); (2) a problem-solving-based psychological intervention delivered via telephone conference call (PSPI-CC; experimental group 2); (3) a problem-solving-based psychological intervention delivered via a smartphone app (PSPI-A; experimental group 3); or (4) a usual care control group (UCCG). Participants in the experimental groups will complete the six sessions/modules of the interventions. Finally, subjects in all groups will be evaluated at post-intervention and 3, 6 and 12-month follow-ups.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

212

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • A Coruña
      • Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain, 15782
        • Recruiting
        • Research Group on Mental Health and Psychopatology
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ángela J. Torres Iglesias, MD, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Vanessa Blanco Seoane, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Manuel Arrojo Romero, MD, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mario Páramo Fernández, MD, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Miguel A. Simón López, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ana M. Bueno Palomino, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Elena Andrade Fernández, PhD.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Patricia Otero Otero, PhD.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be at least 50 years old
  • Reside in Galicia
  • Present suicidal ideation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Present serious mental health or medical disorders
  • Have begun receiving psychological or psychopharmacological treatment in the previous two months or are participating in other suicide prevention research
  • Do not have an appropriate mobile device or sufficient fluency to communicate in Spanish, or have problems that make it impossible to participate
  • Plan to move in the next 18 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Problem-solving-based psychological intervention delivered in a face-to-face format (PSPI-FF)
Participants in this group will receive a problem-solving intervention for suicide prevention in a face-to-face format. The intervention will consist of 6 sessions, approximately 90 minutes in duration each, once a week, in a group format, in person.
The intervention will include training in the components of the problem-solving model and other behavioral and cognitive skills such as detecting warning signals, monitoring mood, relaxation techniques, self-reinforcement, strategies for acting in crisis situations, engaging in enjoyable activities, mindfulness meditation techniques, or strategies for reframing irrational thoughts. It will be developed from the problem-solving model (D'Zurilla and Nezu, 1982) and will reference the indicated prevention program for depression (Vázquez et al., 2015), which has shown efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms and preventing the onset of depression episodes (Otero et al., 2015; Vázquez et al., 2013), with results on symptomatology maintained at 8 years (López et al., 2020); and the indicated prevention intervention that demonstrated efficacy in reducing suicide risk (Xavier et al., 2019).
Experimental: Problem-solving-based psychological intervention delivered via telephone conference call (PSPI-CC)
Participants in this group will receive the intervention described in a teleconference call format, with the same duration, contents, and structure.
The intervention will include training in the components of the problem-solving model and other behavioral and cognitive skills such as detecting warning signals, monitoring mood, relaxation techniques, self-reinforcement, strategies for acting in crisis situations, engaging in enjoyable activities, mindfulness meditation techniques, or strategies for reframing irrational thoughts. It will be developed from the problem-solving model (D'Zurilla and Nezu, 1982) and will reference the indicated prevention program for depression (Vázquez et al., 2015), which has shown efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms and preventing the onset of depression episodes (Otero et al., 2015; Vázquez et al., 2013), with results on symptomatology maintained at 8 years (López et al., 2020); and the indicated prevention intervention that demonstrated efficacy in reducing suicide risk (Xavier et al., 2019).
Experimental: Problem-solving-based psychological intervention delivered via a smartphone app (PSPI-A)
Participants in this group will receive the intervention described adapted to be administered through a smartphone app, with equivalent duration, content, and structure (approximately 90 minutes to complete each of the 6 modules).
The intervention will include training in the components of the problem-solving model and other behavioral and cognitive skills such as detecting warning signals, monitoring mood, relaxation techniques, self-reinforcement, strategies for acting in crisis situations, engaging in enjoyable activities, mindfulness meditation techniques, or strategies for reframing irrational thoughts. It will be developed from the problem-solving model (D'Zurilla and Nezu, 1982) and will reference the indicated prevention program for depression (Vázquez et al., 2015), which has shown efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms and preventing the onset of depression episodes (Otero et al., 2015; Vázquez et al., 2013), with results on symptomatology maintained at 8 years (López et al., 2020); and the indicated prevention intervention that demonstrated efficacy in reducing suicide risk (Xavier et al., 2019).
No Intervention: Usual care (UCCG)
Participants in this group will receive usual care. Usual treatment will include individual and group psychotherapy and/or psychiatric medication as determined by the health professionals they are currently consulting, whether in public or private facilities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline suicidal ideation to post-treatment (7 weeks), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months.
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Suicidal ideation will be assessed using the Suicidal Ideation Scale (SSI; Beck et al., 1979), a semi-structured scale of 19 items with an internal consistency (Kuder-Richardson coefficient [KR-20]) of .89 and an inter-rater reliability (k) of .83.
Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline suicidal ideation to post-treatment (7 weeks), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months.
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Aditionally, the severity of ideation and suicidal behavior over the last month will be assessed using the Columbia Scale for assessing suicide risk (C-SSRS; Posner et al., 2011). It consists of a semi-structured interview with good convergent and discriminant validity and high sensitivity (100.0%) and specificity (99.4%) for the classification of suicidal behavior; the ideation intensity subscale showed a Cronbach's alpha of .73-.95.
Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline hopelessness to post-treatment (7 weeks), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Hopelessness will be assessed with the Beck Hopelessness Scale (HS; Beck et al., 1974), a self-administered instrument of 20 items with a range from 0 to 20. Higher scores mean higher hopelessness. It has an internal consistency (Kuder-Richardson 20 [KR-20]) of .93.
Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline anxiety and depressive symptoms to post-treatment (7 weeks), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Anxiety and depression symptoms will be assessed with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12; Goldberg & Williams, 1988), a self-administered questionnaire of 12 items designed to screen for non-psychotic psychiatric morbidity, with a range from 0 to 12. Higher scores mean higher anxiety and depressive symptoms. Its internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) is .86 for individuals under 65 years of age and .90 for individuals aged 65 years or older.
Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline reasons for living to post-treatment (7 weeks), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Deterrent reasons for attempting suicide will be assessed through the Reasons for Living Inventory (RFL; Linehan et al., 1983), a self-administered instrument of 48 items across six subscales, with a range from 48 to 288. Higher scores mean that individuals exhibit higher reasons for living. Internal consistencies (Cronbach's alphas) range from .72 to .89.
Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline impulsivity to post-treatment (7 weeks), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Impulsivity will be assessed using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11; Patton et al., 1995), a self-administered instrument of 30 items, with a range from 30 to 120. Higher scores mean higher impulsivity. Its internal consistencies (Cronbach's alphas) range from .79 to .82.
Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline problem-solving skills to post-treatment (7 weeks), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Problem-solving skills will be assessed with the Revised Social Problem-Solving Inventory (SPSI-R; D'Zurilla et al., 1997), an inventory of 52 items with a range from 0 to 208, and an internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) ranging from .68 to .92.
Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline social support to post-treatment (7 weeks), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Social support will be evaluated with the DUKE-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire (Duke-UNC-11; Broadhead et al., 1988), an 11-item questionnaire with a range from 11 to 55 and an internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of .90. Higher scores mean higher social support.
Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline syndrome of clinical anger to post-treatment (7 weeks), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
The anger syndrome will be assessed with the Clinical Anger Scale (CAS; Snell et al., 1995), a self-administered instrument of 21 items with a range from 0 to 63, and an internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of .94. Higher scores correspond to greater clinical anger.
Pre- and post-intervention (7 weeks) with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months
Treatment adherence
Time Frame: During the intervention sessions (6 weeks)]
Treatment adherence will be assessed by recording the number of sessions attended or modules completed by each participant, and the number of intersession tasks completed.
During the intervention sessions (6 weeks)]
Satisfaction with the service received
Time Frame: Post-intervention (7 weeks)
Satisfaction with the intervention will be evaluated using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8; Larsen et al., 1979), an 8-item scale whose total score varies from 8 to 32, where a higher score indicates greater satisfaction with the service received. It has an internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of .80.
Post-intervention (7 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sociodemographic, familial, personal history, and current suicide risk variables
Time Frame: Pre-intervention.
These variables will be assessed using a hetero-administered questionnaire, developed ad hoc for this study, following the recommended criteria in the Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Suicidal Behavior (Grupo de Trabajo de la Guía de Práctica Clínica de Prevención y Tratamiento de la Conducta Suicida, 2012/2020). This questionnaire will include information on: sex, age, marital status, living arrangements, rural/urban setting, education level, main activity, family monthly income, characteristics of suicidal ideation (e.g., potential plans, access to lethal means, intent to die, previous suicide attempts); present/past risk factors (e.g., risk factors related to psychological and psychiatric problems, family history of suicidal behavior and mental disorder, history of physical abuse or sexual abuse); and health and psychosocial stress factors (e.g., presence of chronic illness, financial problems).
Pre-intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fernando L. Vazquez González, PhD., University of Santiago de Compostela
  • Principal Investigator: Ángela J. Torres Iglesias, PhD., University of Santiago de Compostela

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicide

Clinical Trials on Problem-solving-based psychological intervention

Subscribe