ASk Questions in GYnecologic Oncology (ASQ-GYO) (ASQ-GYO)

June 15, 2025 updated by: Ira Winer

ASk Questions in GYnecologic Oncology (ASQ-GYO): A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Question Prompt List Communication Intervention in Outpatient Gynecologic Oncology Clinics

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of the ASk Questions in GYnecologic Oncology question prompt list (ASQ-GYO QPL) at improving patient self-efficacy, distress, physician trust, and knowledge compared to usual care during new patient gynecologic oncology visits. Also to determine the acceptability of the ASQ-GYO QPL with new gynecologic oncology patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • Potential participants who are scheduled for a new patient appointment will be contacted via phone or email to determine if they are interested in participating.
  • If a participant is interested, they will choose their preferred method of consenting (phone, email, or in person) and if they would like to complete the pre-visit survey now or at a later time prior to their appointment
  • If consented, all participants will be provided with the pre-survey questionnaire. If eligible, participants will then be randomized to usual care or the intervention (ASk Questions in GYnecologic Oncology question prompt list (ASQ-GYO QPL)
  • If randomized to receive the ASQ-QYO QPL, they will be emailed this document and given a paper copy of the ASQ-GYO QPL in the waiting room prior to their visit to ensure they have received the intervention.
  • Directly after the participant's visit, all participants will be asked to complete the post-visit survey on a tablet in the clinic waiting room, or via a secure link in an email within 1 week of the appointment.
  • After completion of the post-visit survey and within one month of their visit, participants who were not randomized to receive the ASQ-GYO QPL will be sent the ASQ-GYO QPL via email so that they may also have access to this resource.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Elizabeth Johns, MD MS
  • Phone Number: 313-576-8441
  • Email: hr3132@wayne.edu

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Recruiting
        • Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Susan Eggly, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Elizabeth Johns, MD MS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Larrissa Mattei, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Anna Gotschlich, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wei Chen, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sam Robinson, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ira Winer, MD PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age
  • Understands spoken and written English
  • Able to consent to study participation
  • Biopsy confirmed gynecologic cancer diagnosis (ovarian, endometrial, cervical, vulvar, or vaginal cancer or Gestational Trophoblastic Disease) OR have imaging and/or laboratory findings highly concerning for a cancer diagnosis and have not seen a Gynecologic Oncologist

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pathologic diagnosis of dysplasia only (cervical, vulvar, or endometrial)
  • History and/or imaging/laboratory findings more indicative of a non-cancer diagnosis
  • Previous treatment discussion with a Gynecologic Oncologist

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Administration of the ASk Questions in GYnecologic Oncology (ASQ-GYO) Question Prompt List
Participants are provided with a question prompt list
Participants are randomized and will receive the ASQ-GYO prompt list within 2 weeks prior to their new patient appointment with the gynecology oncology physician.
No Intervention: No administration of the ASk Questions in GYnecologic Oncology (ASQ-GYO) Question Prompt List
Participants will not be provided with the question prompt list

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pre- and post-visit self-efficacy scores and compared by trial group
Time Frame: All participants will complete the PEPPI instrument twice: within 2 weeks of their first visit and again within 1 week after the visit.
The Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Provider Interactions (PEPPI) instrument is a validated, 20-item, 5-point Likert scale tool designed to measure patient's self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and attention to their medical concerns from physicians.
All participants will complete the PEPPI instrument twice: within 2 weeks of their first visit and again within 1 week after the visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pre- and post-visit National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer scores compared by trial group
Time Frame: All participants, Twice: within 2 weeks of the first visit and again within 1 week after the visit
The NCCN Distress Thermometer is a one-question, 11-point Likert scale for patient-reported distress in the past week including today
All participants, Twice: within 2 weeks of the first visit and again within 1 week after the visit
Change in pre- and post-visit Trust in a Physician scores compared by trial group
Time Frame: All participants, Twice: within 2 weeks of the first visit and again within 1 week after the visit
The Trust in a Physician score is a validated, 5-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating more trust. The metric addresses generic physician trust prior to the visit, and trust in the specific physician the patient saw during their visit for after the visit
All participants, Twice: within 2 weeks of the first visit and again within 1 week after the visit
Knowledge Screen
Time Frame: All participants will complete a post-visit knowledge screen once within 1 week after their visit
The Knowledge Screen is a 10-item, 5-point Likert scale, investigator-developed set of questions designed to elicit understanding of the contents of the Question Prompt List with higher scores indicating more understanding.
All participants will complete a post-visit knowledge screen once within 1 week after their visit
Patient perceptions of the Question Prompt List
Time Frame: The patients in the intervention group will complete this within 1 week after their visit.
This is a 15-item investigator-developed set of questions with 7 items utilizing a 5-point Likert scale and 8 items utilizing binary yes/no questions designed to elicit the acceptability of the Question Prompt List among the patients in the intervention group.
The patients in the intervention group will complete this within 1 week after their visit.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ira Winer, MD PhD, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Subscribe