The Effect Of Simulation-Supported Pediatric CPR Training Based On CRM On Knowledge, Attitude, And Performance

April 1, 2024 updated by: Signem ANOL KILIÇ, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

The Effect Of Simulation-Supported Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Based On Crew Resource Management On Knowledge, Attitude, And Performance

Crew Resource Management is a training system that aims to use all available resources effectively and increase safety by improving technical knowledge and skills as well as non-technical skills in risky tasks such as CPR. In safe critical patient management, the healthcare team should have interpersonal skills such as communication, stress management, teamwork, and leadership, cognitive skills such as situational awareness, task completion, planning, monitoring the situation, and rapid response to critical incidents, in addition to technical skills. To improve outcomes after pediatric cardiac arrest, many systems have been developed for performance measurement and quality improvement initiatives of the healthcare team. However, studies are needed to evaluate the effects of these systems. This study was planned to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-supported pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training based on team resource management on knowledge, attitude, and performance of the healthcare team in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-supported pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training based on the principles of Team Resource Management (ERM) on the knowledge, attitude, and performance of the healthcare team in the pediatric intensive care unit.

In this prospective randomized controlled study, nurses and physician assistants working in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (n=35), determined as the intervention group, and in the Pediatric Emergency Department (n=35), which was determined as the control group, were included in the sample. The intervention group received EKY-based pediatric CPR training, and it was assumed that the control group knew pediatric CPR management by their clinical duties. All CPR teams in the intervention and control groups were simulated with pediatric cardiac arrest scenarios and their pediatric CPR knowledge, attitudes, and performance were examined.While forming the intervention and control groups, stratified random sampling was performed by targeting the years of pediatric professional experience of resident physicians and nurses, and homogeneity between the groups was ensured.

The intervention group received CRM based pediatric CPR training and the control group was assumed to know pediatric CPR management as per their clinical duties. 'Healthcare Team Socio-Demographic Data Collection Form', 'Pediatric CPR Information Form', 'Teamwork Attitudes Scale', 'Pediatric CPR Team Performance Checklist', 'Student Satisfaction in Learning and Self-Confidence Scale' was used to collect the data for the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bornova
      • İzmir, Bornova, Turkey, 35100
        • Ege University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Working in Ege University Pediatric Intensive Care Unit or Pediatric Emergency Service
  • Voluntary acceptance to participate in the study
  • Participated in CPR case management at least once
  • Not having received ECM training before
  • Not having received any training on Pediatric CPR and ECPR during the implementation phase of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Voluntary refusal to participate in the study,
  • Never participated in CPR case management,
  • Having received EKY training before,
  • Having received any training in Paediatric CPR and ECM during the implementation phase of the study,
  • Incomplete completion of the data collection tools of the study or failure to complete the simulation phase

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
The intervention group was divided into 5 CPR teams consisting of 5 nurses and 2 physician assistants. While forming the intervention group, stratified random sampling was performed by targeting the years of professional experience of assistant physicians and nurses and homogeneity between subgroups was ensured. CRM-Based Pediatric CPR Training was given to the intervention group.

The sociodemographic information form, Pediatric CPR knowledge level and teamwork attitudes pretest were administered to the healthcare teams just before the training intervention.

The intervention group received a 3-hour training intervention on technical/non-technical skills for CRM-Based Pediatric CPR Training To measure pediatric CPR team performance, 5 different scenarios were prepared by the researcher by INACLS standards. One day after the training intervention, simulation application including pediatric cardiac arrest scenarios was applied to all CPR teams in the intervention(5 groups) and control(5 groups) groups. The scenario content was based on a 5-year-old male patient diagnosed with Pneumonia+Septic Shock.

Pediatric CPR skill levels of the healthcare teams were evaluated during the simulation practice. Immediately after the simulation, the post-intervention post-test of Pediatric CPR knowledge level and team attitudes of the healthcare teams was performed.

No Intervention: Control Group
The Control group was divided into 5 CPR teams consisting of 5 nurses and 2 physician assistants. While forming the control group, stratified random sampling was performed by targeting the years of professional experience of assistant physicians and nurses, and homogeneity between subgroups was ensured. The control group was assumed to know pediatric CPR management as per their clinical duties and no educational intervention was made.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Socio-demographic data of the healthcare team
Time Frame: Baseline

In this form, there are closed-ended questions about the participant's age, gender, occupation, educational status, duration of professional experience, area of professional experience, the status of receiving Pediatric CPR training in undergraduate education, the status of attending the Pediatric CPR Course, and the status of participating in CPR case management in the clinic.

In addition, open-ended questions were included to evaluate the reasons for the difficulties experienced in the management of the CPR process, the perception of a functional team in CPR management, the status of providing functional teamwork in risky tasks such as CPR in their clinics, and what are the individual-clinical-organizational suggestions to improve ECM management in the CPR process.

Baseline
Pediatric KPR knowledge level
Time Frame: 2 month

The effect of simulation-supported pediatric KPR training based on team resource management on knowledge

The form includes a total of 25 statements, including 13 true and 12 false statements for the management of the Pediatric CPR process. A cut-off point of 80 points was set for the participants to be evaluated as successful in the form in which the level of knowledge of the participants was determined. For each statement in the form, the participants were expected to answer as 'True' - 'False' - 'No Idea'; each item was evaluated over 4 points.

2 month
Pediatric KPR team attitude level
Time Frame: 2 month

The effect of simulation-supported pediatric KPR training based on team resource management on team attitude

The Teamwork Attitudes Scale includes 5 sub-dimensions (team structure, leadership, situation monitoring, mutual support, and communication) and 28 items. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale (Strongly Disagree=1 point, Disagree=2 points, Undecided=3 points, Agree=4 points, Strongly Agree=5 points). As a result of the evaluation of the scale total score averages and sub-dimension score averages, the highest score is 140 and the lowest score is 28. As a result of the evaluation of the scale, the high score of the individual shows that the teamwork attitude is positive.

2 month
Pediatric KPR team performance level
Time Frame: 2 month

The effect of simulation-supported pediatric KPR training based on team resource management on performance

Pediatric CPR Team Performance Checklist; while the participant performed the skill expected from him/her in the simulation environment, the researcher monitored how this skill was performed and evaluated through pre-structured and progressive checklists. In the evaluation of the Pediatric CPR Team Performance Checklist; according to the performance of the participant, each item was evaluated as 'Not Performed=0 points', 'Partially Performed=1 point', and 'Performed=2 points'. Total score averages were used in the evaluation. The Pediatric CPR Team Performance Checklist includes the following sections; Phase 1: Pre-CPR Performance Checklist (16 items) Phase 2: CPR Process Performance Checklist (16 items) Phase 3: Post-KPR Performance Checklist (6 items) Phase 4: CPR Process Non-Technical Skills Checklist (13 items)

2 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: SİĞNEM ANOL KILIÇ, PhD, Research assistant

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Clinical Trials on Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Based On Team Resource Management

Subscribe