- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06352034
Empathy Training for Psychology Students Trainees
May 8, 2024 updated by: Yinyin Zang, PhD, Peking University
Effectiveness of Empathy Training Among Psychology Students Trainees: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aims to examine the effectiveness of empathy training for psychology student trainees who plan to become mental health practitioners.
The training consists of five sessions of psychoeducation, three-role group exercises, and Q&A.
Empathy assessment will be based on self-reported, listener-reported, and observer-reported measurements.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
50
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Yinyin Zang, PhD
- Phone Number: 86 15553201610
- Email: yinyin.zang@pku.edu.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Peking, Beijing, China, 100871
- Peking University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult male and female (aged between 18 and 65 years old)
- Major or double major in psychology
- Currently enrolled undergraduate or graduate students
- Taking psychological counselor as one of the major occupational chooses
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hearing, speech, reading, or writing impairments
- A diagnosis of mental disorders
- Simultaneously participating in other emotional skills training
- Suicidal ideation or self-injurious behavior
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Empathy Training
The Empathy training consists of five sessions.
Each session contains psychoeducation, three-role group exercises, and Q&A.
The interval between every session is 5-14 days.
Sessions are scheduled for 1.5 hours, including 30 minutes of psychoeducation, 45 minutes of three-role group exercises, and 15 minutes of Q&A.
|
The intervention contains five themes: 1) An overview of empathy and emotions.
2) Cognitive empathy and clarification technique.
3) Emotional empathy and reflection of feelings technique.
4) Awaring and dealing with the inner feelings while empathizing.
5) Empathy timing and "emotional pendulum" technique.
|
|
No Intervention: Wait-List
The participants in the wait-list group will not receive the empathy training or other similar training until all the groups finish their one-month follow-up measurements.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from consultation willingness question inquiry
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
A single item inquiry "How willing are you to come back for consultation next time?"
will be asked to the simulation "client" to measure the ability to build the counselor-client relationship.
The item scores from 0 to 4. A higher score represents a higher ability to build the counselor-client relationship.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
|
Change from morphed emotion perception task
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
An experimental task measures the ability of emotion perception.
Participants need to identify the emotion of facial pictures out of six basic emotions (i.e., anger, sadness, fear, disgust, surprise, and happiness).
The higher accuracy indicates better emotion perception ability.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
|
Change from Baseline of the Measure of Empathy Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
An 8-item empathy self-report scale measures cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on a 5-point Likert scale (score from 1 to 5, and total score vary from 8 to 40).
A higher score represents higher empathy ability.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
|
Change from Baseline of the Emotion Perception Scale
Time Frame: 1 month
|
A 13-item emotion perception scale measures the extent of emotions within a month, including anger, happiness, sadness, fear, surprise, disgust, guilt, shame, pressure, depression, inner anger, numbness, and aggrievedness.
Each item scores from 0 to 5, with total score varying from 0 to 65.
A higher score represents a higher extent of feeling the emotions.
|
1 month
|
|
Change from Baseline of the Peking Alexithymia Scale
Time Frame: 1 month
|
A 23-item Peking alexithymia scale measures the ability and willingness to feel, recognize, and share emotions on a 5-point Likert scale (scores from 1 to 5, and total scores vary from 23 to 115).
A higher score represents more severe alexithymia.
|
1 month
|
|
Change from counseling duration
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
A 10-minute counseling simulation will be conducted for each participant.
The simulation will last 10 minutes or before 10 minutes if the participant gives up midway.
The duration time will be recorded to measure the counseling tolerance of the participants.
Longer duration indicates better counseling tolerance.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
|
Change from Baseline of 12-Item Version of the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
A 12-item empathy self-report, senior-psychological-counselor-report, and simulate-client-report scale measures regard (R), empathic understanding (E), congruence (C), and unconditionality of regard (U) of the therapist.
The scoring of each item is from -3 to +3 (12 items, total score varies from -36 to 36).
A higher score represents better facilitative conditions the therapist can shape.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline of the Patient Health Questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The 9-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) measures the depression symptoms (scores from 0 to 3, and total score vary from 0 to 27).
A higher score represents worse depression symptoms.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The generalized anxiety disorder-7 scale (GAD-7) measures the generalized anxiety disorder symptoms (scored from 0 to 3, and total score from 0 to 21).
A higher score represents worse anxiety symptoms.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline of the Peking Irritability Scale
Time Frame: 1 month
|
A 17-item irritability measurement scale, Peking irritability scale, measures impulsive emotions, thoughts, and behaviors on a 5-point Likert scale (score from 1 to 5, and total score vary from 17 to 85).
A higher score represents higher irritability.
|
1 month
|
|
Change from Baseline of the the Fatigue Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
A 10-item fatigue assessment scale measures the degree of fatigue (score from 1 to 5, and total score vary from 10 to 50).
A higher score represents a higher degree of fatigue.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
|
Change from Baseline of the the Patient Health Questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
A 21-item patient health questionnaire measures the extent of semantic symptoms (score from 0 to 2, and total score vary from 0 to 42).
A higher score represents a higher degree of semantic problems.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline of the Cognitive-Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
An 18-item cognitive-emotion regulation questionnaire measures regulation strategy (score from 1 to 5, and total score vary from 18 to 90).
A higher score represents higher cognitive-emotion regulation ability.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
|
Change from Baseline of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
A 36-item difficulties in emotion regulation scale measures emotion regulation difficulties (score from 1 to 5, and total score vary from 36 to 180).
A higher score represents higher difficulties in emotion regulation.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
|
Change from Baseline of the the Satisfaction with Life Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
A 5-item satisfaction with life scale measures life satisfaction (score from 1 to 7, and total score vary from 5 to 35).
A higher score represents more satisfaction with life.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
|
Change from Baseline of the the Subjective Happiness Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
A 4-item subjective happiness scale measures happiness (score from 1 to 7, and total score vary from 4 to 28).
A higher score represents a happier state.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
|
|
Change from Baseline of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale
Time Frame: 1 month
|
A 10-item Connor-Davidson resilience scale measures resilience (score from 0 to 4, and total score vary from 0 to 40).
A higher score represents a higher degree of resilience.
|
1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yinyin Zang, PhD, Study Principal Investigator Peking University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
May 20, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 31, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
April 8, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 10, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 8, 2024
Last Verified
May 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Empathy Training for Students
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Empathy
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompleted
-
Universidad Pontificia ComillasCompleted
-
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health...Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial HospitalCompleted
-
University of Paris 5 - Rene DescartesUniversity of Paris 13; University Paris 7 - Denis DiderotCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
KTO Karatay UniversityCompleted
-
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health...Active, not recruitingAttitude | EmpathyTaiwan
Clinical Trials on Empathy Training
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiNot yet recruiting
-
Hong Kong Metropolitan UniversityRecruitingEmpathy Training of Healthcare Professional StudentsHong Kong
-
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health...Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial HospitalCompleted
-
Alain KaelinCTU-EOC Clinical Trial Unit Ente Ospedaliero CantonaleRecruitingParkinson Disease(PD)Switzerland
-
Max Planck Social Neuroscience LabHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinActive, not recruiting
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompleted
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandUniversity of Basel; Max Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentCompletedInformation Structuring Skills | Empathy SkillsSwitzerland
-
Mansoura UniversityNot yet recruitingPatient Satisfaction | Communication SkillsEgypt
-
Haseki Training and Research HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Max Planck Social Neuroscience LabParacelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (PMU)Active, not recruitingControl (Delayed Training) Condition | Intervention ConditionGermany