Effectiveness of an Online Intervention Using a Feminist Approach on Gender Equality Promotion and Sexual Violence Prevention in China

April 5, 2024 updated by: The University of Hong Kong

Effectiveness of an Online Intervention Using a Feminist Approach on Gender Equality Promotion and Sexual Violence Prevention in China: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

This paper presents the findings of a clustered randomized controlled trial (cRCT) that evaluated the effectiveness of an online feminist sexual health intervention among Chinese young adults, providing insights into the impacts of this innovative approach and contribute to the growing body of literature on feminist interventions for sexual health and equality promotion.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

422

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 000000
        • The University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Young adults aged between 18-29 years old who possessed a mobile phone
  2. Had prior experience in using social media
  3. Were able to read and understand Chinese

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Those with a physical impediment (e.g., blindness) preventing them from accessing the mobile content

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: General Sexual Health intervention
Participants will receive their general online sexual health education programming.
This general online sexual health education consisted of online videos, quizzes and game that covered a wide range of diverse topics on love, sex and relationships such as healthy and respectful relationships, body self-esteem, sexual identity and orientation, sexual rights and decision making, in addition to the conventional focus on sexual dysfunction and disease aversion.
Experimental: Feminist Sexual Health Intervention
Participants will receive online feminist sexual health program.
The intervention included a game, five short videos, two posters, and five online quizzes, which were provided with a frequency of two posts per week and a final real-time online workshop. Materials included content on the spectrum of gender and sexual identities and orientations, gender and sexual roles, consent and communication, body positivity and self-acceptance, sexual pleasure and desire, as well as risky sexual behavior associated with dating app use and the legal issues and risks of sexual assault, such as precautionary steps and available resources.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rape myth acceptance
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at one week and three months
Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale -Short Form, which consists of 17 items (1=not at all agree, 7=very much agree) assessing respondents' belief in rape myths (e.g., "Rape happens when a man's sex drive gets out of control"). The scores range from 17 to 119, with lower scores indicating less subscription to rape myths.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at one week and three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sociocultural Attitudes toward Appearance
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at one week and three months
Sociocultural Attitudes toward Appearance Questionnaire-3 consisted of eight items assessing the degree to which an individual accepts and internalizes societal standards of beauty. Examples include "I tend to compare my body to people in magazines and on TV" and "Women who appear in TV shows and movies project the type of appearance that I see as my goal." Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale. The scores range from 8 to 40, with lower scores indicating less endorsement of sociocultural beauty standards.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at one week and three months
Sexual Attitudes Scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at one week and three months
Sexual Attitudes Scale is a 22-item scale that includes: Permissiveness (six items); Responsibility (four items); Pleasure (four items); Instrumentality (four items); and Communion (four items). The factor items were rated on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). After reverse-coding the negatively worded items, the item scores of each factor are summarized to obtain a total score for the factor. High scores indicated a high level of acceptance of the factor. The scores range from 22 to 110.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at one week and three months
Sexual Desire Inventory
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at one week and three months
Sexual Desire Inventory is a self-reported scale developed to assess sexual desire. It has 14 items in two aspects: Dyadic Sexual Desire (DSD)and Solitary Sexual Desire (SSD). Items1,2,10 and14 are rated on 8-point scales with responses from 0 (Not at all or Always) to 7 (> once a day or < one day) and Items 3-9, 11-13 are rated on 9-point scales with responses from 0 (No desire, Not important at all, or Extremely low desire) to 8 (Strong desire, Extremely important, or High desire). High scores indicated a high level of sexual desire. The scores range from 0 to 108.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at one week and three months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EA230308

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sexual Violence

Clinical Trials on Sexual health intervention

Subscribe