- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06358885
IGHID 12230 - An Implementation Trial of an Experiential Brief Alcohol Intervention for HIV Prevention (EBAI)
IGHID 12230 - Scaling up the Brief Alcohol Intervention to Prevent HIV Infection in Vietnam: a Cluster Randomized, Implementation Trial (EBAI)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In this cluster-randomized controlled, hybrid type 3 implementation trial, investigators will assess two approaches to the brief alcohol intervention (BAI) scale-up. The BAI is an evidence-based intervention to address unhealthy alcohol use that comprises 2 in-person sessions and 2 booster telephone sessions. Face-to-face 45-minute sessions occur ~1 month apart; 10-minute telephone sessions occur 2 to 3 weeks after each face-to-face session. Investigators chose a hybrid type 3 design to evaluate implementation outcomes, while simultaneously ensuring that effectiveness outcomes, specifically viral suppression, are achieved. Investigators will compare facilitation (FAC) versus EBAI+FAC in 30 ART clinics in Vietnam. The FAC arm, the comparison arm, will use internal and external facilitators to help clinics and staff address common barriers to BAI implementation. Facilitation typically works through interactive problem solving and support. In the EBAI+FAC arm, clinic staff, defined as clinic directors, physicians, nurses, and counselors, will be offered the experiential BAI (EBAI), regardless of their own alcohol use, prior to BAI implementation, and clinic staff responsible for delivering the BAI to patients will also be offered 3 additional consolidation opportunities to integrate their own experiences with their delivery of the BAI to PWH. Randomization will be 1:1 with 15 clinics per arm. Clinics will be assessed pre-training for key contextual factors, related to clinic characteristics and clinic staff.
Upon trial initiation, persons with HIV (PWH) initiating or on ART will be screened for unhealthy alcohol use with the AUDIT-C (Time 0). Those PWH who screen positive for unhealthy alcohol use will be offered the BAI by trained clinic counselors. PWH who do not screen positive will continue to be screened with the AUDIT-C at routine ART clinic visits. PWH who screen positive but refuse to participate in the trial or are excluded due to alcohol withdrawal symptoms will continue to be screened with the AUDIT-C at every routine ART clinic visit per standard clinic procedures. PWH may decline AUDIT screening when it is offered. Implementation and effectiveness outcomes will be evaluated to 12 or 24 months (Aim 1). After the 12- month assessments, mechanisms underlying successful implementation in both arms will be explored using qualitative and quantitative methods (Aim 2). Investigators will explore the effect of implementing the BAI (both arms) and experiencing the BAI (EBAI+FAC arm) on staff members' alcohol use and attitudes toward alcohol and BAI (Aim 3).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hanoi, Vietnam
- Hanoi Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
PWH cohort participants
- Person living with HIV at any stage of HIV infection
- Currently attending the study ART clinic at any ART stage (initiating or receiving ART)
- AUDIT-C score >=4 for men or >=3 for women
- >= 18 years of age
- Willing to provide informed consent, which includes consenting to interview and collection of dried blood spots
Clinic staff participants:
- Work at the ART clinic as a clinic director, physician, nurse, or counselor
- Willing to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
PWH cohort participants:
- Psychological disturbance preventing participation
- Cognitive impairment
- Threatening behavior
- Unwilling to provide locator information Note: If a participant screens positive with the AUDIT-C and is identified to be at substantial risk for alcohol withdrawal based on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol Scale (CIWA) will be referred for treatment. They will not be eligible for enrollment until after alcohol withdrawal concerns are addressed.
- These participants may be rescreened, consented, and enrolled after treatment.
Clinic staff participants:
- Psychological disturbance, cognitive impairment, or threatening behavior
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Facilitation Only (FAC)
Clinics randomized to the FAC arm will implement BAI delivery to PWH using the facilitation only approach.
|
The facilitation approach will use a flexible clinic level implementation strategy that helps clinics to address common barriers, such as counselor skills, competing priorities, and resource deficits.
|
|
Experimental: Facilitation Plus an Experiential Brief Alcohol Intervention (EBAI+FAC)
Clinics randomized to the EBAI+FAC arm will implement BAI delivery to PWH participants using the facilitation approach.
Additionally, clinic staff, irrespective of their own alcohol use, will be offered the BAI themselves prior to delivering the BAI.
|
The facilitation approach will use a flexible clinic level implementation strategy that helps clinics to address common barriers, such as counselor skills, competing priorities, and resource deficits.
Clinic staff will be offered the experiential BAI prior to implementation.
The BAI comprises 2 in-person sessions and 2 booster phone sessions.
Clinic staff responsible for delivering the BAI to PWH participants will be offered 3 additional consolidation sessions to integrate their experiences receiving the BAI with their delivery of the BAI.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fidelity Score
Time Frame: 15 months
|
Fidelity is a clinic-level measure assessed as a composite of the recipients of the BAI. The timeframe of 15 months reflects individual recruitment over 12 months plus 3 months for completion of the BAI. The score comprises successful completion of the 4 protocol-specified BAI sessions (2 in-person, 2 by phone) within 7 weeks of the initial session weighted by the central fidelity rater's quality rating of the in-person sessions. Fidelity will be assessed using a tailored selection of fidelity measures including the BAI Core Components Checklist. The clinic fidelity score ranges from 0-100. The score will be the percentage of counseling sessions completed, multiplied (weighted) by the combined average quality rating of counseling sessions. Higher scores indicate higher fidelity. |
15 months
|
|
Viral Suppression
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Viral suppression is defined as a viral load <1000 copies/mL on a dried blood spot (DBS) sample collected 12 months after enrollment of a participant.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
BAI Acceptability Score - Clinic Staff: Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) scale
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
|
Acceptability is the perception that the BAI intervention is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory to clinic staff. Acceptability among clinic staff will be assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), which consists of 4 items containing responses on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1-4. The AIM score will be the mean of the 4 item responses (range: 1-5). Higher AIM scores indicate higher acceptability. |
Up to 12 months
|
|
BAI Acceptability score Counselors: Mental Health Implementation Science Tools (mhIST) Acceptability Scale for Providers
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
|
Acceptability is the perception that the BAI intervention is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory to counselors delivering the BAI to patients. Acceptability among counselor participants will be assessed using the Mental Health Implementation Science Tools (mhIST) Acceptability Scale for providers, which consists of 13 items containing responses on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0-3. The mhIST score is calculated as the mean score of all responses (range: 0-39). Higher mhIST scores indicate higher acceptability. |
Up to 12 months
|
|
BAI Acceptability PWH: Mental Health Implementation Science Tools (mhIST) Acceptability Scale for Consumers
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
|
Acceptability is the perception that the BAI intervention is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory to PWH. Acceptability among PWH participants will be assessed using the Mental Health Implementation Science Tools (mhIST) Acceptability Scale for consumers, which consists of 15 items containing responses on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0-3. The mhIST score is calculated as the mean score of all responses (range: 0-45). Higher mhIST scores indicate higher acceptability. |
Up to 12 months
|
|
Penetration- Proportion of PWH Screened with the AUDIT-C
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
|
The first penetration metric will be the: proportion of PWH initiating or on ART who are screened with the AUDIT-C.
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
Penetration - Proportion of PWH who screen positive who receive at least one counseling session
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
|
The second penetration metric will be the proportion of PWH that screen positive who receive at least one BAI counseling session.
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
Costs
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
|
Investigators will use an "ingredients" or bottom-up approach, with comparison to "top-down" costing.
The cost estimates will follow the investigators published conceptual framework for assessing implementation costs and cost analysis of health services.
Investigators will include all types of measurable costs (e.g., staff, equipment, consumables, overheads, etc.) associated with key steps and component of the respective implementation strategy and BAI service delivery.
Investigators will follow international conventions for all procedures including economic costing, discounting, and reporting.
|
Up to 24 months
|
|
Sustainability Score: Provider Support of Sustainment Scale (PRESS)
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
|
Sustainability will be measured among clinic staff, including directors, using the provider support of sustainment scale (PRESS), a brief, 3-item measure of sustainment that is pragmatic and useable across different evidence-based intervention (EBIs), provider types, and settings.
Responses are recorded on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (to a very great extent) and the score is calculated as the mean of the 3 responses with higher scores indicating higher sustainability.
The PRESS captures frontline staff's report of their clinic's continued use of an EBI.
|
Up to 24 months
|
|
AUDIT (total score) - Clinic staff
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
|
Investigators will assess the total Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score.
The AUDIT is a 10-item scale with summed responses ranging from 0-40; higher scores indicating more harmful alcohol consumption.
|
Up to 24 months
|
|
AUDIT (total score) - PWH
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
|
Investigators will assess the total Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score.
The AUDIT is a 10-item scale with summed responses ranging from 0-40; higher scores indicating more harmful alcohol consumption.
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
Fidelity (Extended Window)
Time Frame: 17 months
|
Fidelity is a clinic-level measure assessed as a composite of the recipients of the BAI. The timeframe of 17 months reflects individual recruitment over 12 months plus 5 months for completion of the BAI. The score comprises successful completion of the 4 protocol-specified BAI sessions (2 in-person, 2 by phone) within 4 months of the initial session weighted by the central fidelity rater's quality rating of the in-person sessions. Fidelity will be assessed using a tailored selection of fidelity measures including the BAI Core Components Checklist. The clinic fidelity score ranges from 0-100. The score will be the percentage of counseling sessions completed, multiplied (weighted) by the combined average quality rating of counseling sessions. Higher scores indicate higher fidelity. |
17 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Vivian Go, MD, University of North Carolina
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Blood-Borne Infections
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Infections
- RNA Virus Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Communicable Diseases
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Lentivirus Infections
- Retroviridae Infections
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
- Slow Virus Diseases
- HIV Infections
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
- Organic Chemicals
- Investigative Techniques
- Alcohols
- Ethanol
- Methods
Other Study ID Numbers
- 22-3123
- R01AA030480 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV-1-infection
-
Fundación HuéspedMSD Pharmaceuticals LLC; Fundacion IDEAANot yet recruiting
-
Henan Genuine Biotech Co., Ltd.Recruiting
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNot yet recruiting
-
Craig Cohen, MD, MPHNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Duke University and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruiting
-
BioNTech SERecruitingHIV -1 InfectionGermany, United States
-
TaiMed Biologics Inc.Active, not recruitingHIV -1 InfectionUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Not yet recruitingHIV -1 Infection | Methamphetamine UseUnited States
-
Pomeranian Medical University SzczecinViiV HealthcareNot yet recruitingHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Infection | HIV-1 Subtype A6 Infection | HIV-1 Subtype B Infection | Virologically Suppressed HIV-1 Infection Receiving Long-Acting Antiretroviral TherapyPoland
-
Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades InfecciosasConsejeria de Salud. Junta de Andalucia. SpainCompletedHIV Infection | HIV-1 InfectionSpain
Clinical Trials on Facilitation (FAC)
-
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training...CompletedStroke RehabilitationTurkey
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompleted
-
South Central VA Mental Illness Research, Education...CompletedDepressionUnited States
-
Noctem, LLCUnited States Department of Defense; Naval Health Research Center; US Air Force... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingChronic Insomnia | Implementation; Digital HealthUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Utah; Pastors 4 PCORRecruitingHypertensionUnited States
-
University of MichiganNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)TerminatedDepression | Bipolar Disorder | Mood DisorderUnited States
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingAutism Spectrum DisorderPakistan
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentVA Oncology and Precision Medicine; VA Tobacco Use Treatment National Program... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingLung Cancer Screening | Tobacco Dependence TreatmentUnited States