Core Competency Model for Corrections (CCM-C)

April 13, 2024 updated by: Robert J. Cramer, PhD, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Development and Implementation of a Self-Directed Violence (SDV) Prevention Training Program for the North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections

The overall goal of this project is to design, implement, and revise the Core Competency Model for Corrections (CCM-C), an evidence-based Self-Directed Violence (SDV) prevention training program for correctional mental health providers in the North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections (DAC). The proposed specific aims are:

Aim 1: To create the CCM-C training program. Aim 2: To assess preliminary training effectiveness. Aim 3: To gather training program quality improvement feedback from corrections stakeholders.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Investigators will conduct a pilot feasibility and preliminary effectiveness evaluation of the Core Competency Model for Corrections (CCM-C; Cramer et al., 2022). This training approach involves psycho-educational content, self-assessment tools, interactive exercises to address 10 clinical care and practitioner-focused skill sets for suicide and self-injury risk assessment and management. The protocol employs a waitlist control sequential cross-over design and mixed-method evaluation approach targeting 50-100 NC correctional behavioral health clinicians (BHCs). Through an ongoing academic-community partnership, investigators will employ a Corrections Advisory Panel (CAP) to provide expert review of training. The CAP will comprise six NC-DAC BHCs and 4-6 external BHCs with experience in correctional behavioral health. Two training groups will each provide three assessments via an online self-report evaluation battery gathering information regarding participant demographics; SDV prevention knowledge, attitudes, and perceived skills; incarceration-related attitudes; and perceived importance of and intention to use SDV prevention practices.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27699
        • North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Behavioral Health Clinician (BHC)
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Living in the U.S.
  • Currently employed by the NC DAC

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decisional or cognitive impairments that preclude being able to consent to study participation
  • Being a member of the study correctional advisory panel (CAP)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Core Competency Model for Corrections (CCM-C) Self-Directed Violence Prevention Training group 1
Receives CCM-C training two weeks after baseline assessment.
The Core Competency Model (CCM; Cramer et al., 2013, 2019) is an evidence-based educational training program for BHCs in suicide prevention core suicide prevention skills. The ten core competencies are: (1) Manage personal attitudes and reactions to suicide; (2) Maintain a collaborative stance toward the client; (3) Elicit evidence-based risk and protective factors; (4) Focus on current suicide plan and intent of suicidal ideation; (5) Determine risk level; (6) Enact a collaborative evidence-based treatment plan; (7) Notify and involve other persons; (8) Document risk, plan, and reasoning for clinical decisions; (9) Know the law concerning suicide, and; (10) Engage in debriefing and self-care. The CCM will be adapted for this pilot trial. In light of the SDV problem in carceral settings, the CCM for Corrections (CCM-C; Cramer, Kaniuka, & Peiper, 2022) was adapted to address both suicide and self-injury assessment, treatment, and prevention.
Experimental: Core Competency Model for Corrections (CCM-C) Self-Directed Violence Prevention Training group 2
Receives CCM-C training two weeks after follow-up 1 assessment.
The Core Competency Model (CCM; Cramer et al., 2013, 2019) is an evidence-based educational training program for BHCs in suicide prevention core suicide prevention skills. The ten core competencies are: (1) Manage personal attitudes and reactions to suicide; (2) Maintain a collaborative stance toward the client; (3) Elicit evidence-based risk and protective factors; (4) Focus on current suicide plan and intent of suicidal ideation; (5) Determine risk level; (6) Enact a collaborative evidence-based treatment plan; (7) Notify and involve other persons; (8) Document risk, plan, and reasoning for clinical decisions; (9) Know the law concerning suicide, and; (10) Engage in debriefing and self-care. The CCM will be adapted for this pilot trial. In light of the SDV problem in carceral settings, the CCM for Corrections (CCM-C; Cramer, Kaniuka, & Peiper, 2022) was adapted to address both suicide and self-injury assessment, treatment, and prevention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility
Time Frame: Immediately post-training
Feasibility of CCM-C training as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM; Weiner et al., 2017); the scale ranges from 5-20 where higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Immediately post-training
Acceptability
Time Frame: Immediately post-training
Acceptability of CCM-C training as measured by the self-report subscale on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM; Weiner et al., 2017); the scale ranges from 5-20 where higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
Immediately post-training
Appropriateness
Time Frame: Immediately post-training
Appropriateness of CCM-C training as measured by the self-report subscale of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM; Weiner et al., 2017); the scale ranges from 5-20 where higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Immediately post-training
Usability
Time Frame: Immediately post-training
Usability of CCM-C training as measured by the self-report subscale of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM; Weiner et al., 2017); the scale ranges from 5-20 where higher scores indicate greater usability.
Immediately post-training

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived self-directed violence prevention skills
Time Frame: Immediately post-training
The Suicide Competency Assessment Form (SCAF; Cramer et al., 2013, 2020) will be used to measure participants' perceived SDV prevention skill mastery. The SCAF is a self-report questionnaire that contains 10 items capturing core competencies of the CCM-C training; these items are measured on a four-point scale of perceived competency (1 = incapable; 4 = advanced) where higher scores denote better competency. For the present study, these 10 items was adapted to capture SDV-focused skills.
Immediately post-training
Willingness to intervene with a suicidal person
Time Frame: Immediately post-training
The Attitudes about Intervening with a Suicidal Person (AIBS; Aldrich et al., 2014) self-report questionnaire will be used to measure SDV prevention-focused attitudes and the willingness to intervene in an event where a person is experiencing SDV. The AIBS is a subscale of the larger, recently revised Willingness to Intervene against a Suicidal Person Enhanced questionnaire (Aldrich & Cerel, 2023). Higher scores (range 14-90) convey more positive attitudes and greater willingness to intervening with someone in distress.
Immediately post-training
Beliefs about incarcerated persons engaging in self-directed violence
Time Frame: Immediately post-training
The Attitudes toward Prisoners who Self-Harm (APSH; Garbutt & Casey, 2015; Ireland & Quinn, 2007) scale is a self-report questionnaire that will be used to measure SDV prevention-focused attitudes and stigma. The APSH consists of 25 items with a total score; higher scores (range 25-125_ denote more stigmatizing beliefs.
Immediately post-training
Self-directed violence prevention knowledge
Time Frame: Immediately post-training
For this pilot evaluation, investigators created a 10 multiple-choice CCM-C Knowledge Quiz. Correct answers are summed for a total score (range 0-10) where higher scores indicate greater understanding of the CCM-C.
Immediately post-training
Perceived importance of training
Time Frame: Immediately post-training
Investigators will use the intention to use training content scale (Cramer et al., 2019), a brief self-report questionnaire, to capture BHC's perceived importance in using (pre-training) and intent to use (post-training) CCM-C training content. Across seven items, higher scores (item mean 1-5) denote greater perceived importance of the training.
Immediately post-training

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compassion fatigue: Job burnout
Time Frame: Immediately post-training
The Compassion Fatigue-Short Scale (CF-SS; Adams, Boscarino, & Figley, 2006), a self-report questionnaire, will be used to assess feelings of compassion fatigue, conceptualized as secondary traumatic stress (5 items) and job burnout (8 items). This measure contains 13 items. This subscale score denotes higher job burnout (range 8-80).
Immediately post-training
Compassion fatigue: Traumatic stress
Time Frame: Immediately post-training
The Compassion Fatigue-Short Scale (CF-SS; Adams, Boscarino, & Figley, 2006), a self-report questionnaire, will be used to assess feelings of compassion fatigue, conceptualized as secondary traumatic stress (5 items) and job burnout (8 items). This measure contains 13 items. This subscale score denotes higher traumatic stress (range 5-50).
Immediately post-training

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

3
Subscribe