Enhancing Epilepsy Management With Precision Deep Brain Stimulation (EPI-BOOST)

April 8, 2024 updated by: Lutz Weise, Nova Scotia Health Authority

EPI-BOOST: Enhancing Epilepsy Management With Precision Deep Brain Stimulation

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of objective neural response feedback on deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming for drug-resistant epilepsy in a prospective observational cohort study.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aim 1: To objectively monitor epilepsy burden with the provided sensing capabilities of the DBS leads by quantifying the association between neuronal activity and seizure frequency

Aim 2: To use the neuronal activity to inform programming of DBS for patients with epilepsy, and assess the impact on patient and caregiver quality of life and hospital costs.

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures that affects millions of individuals worldwide and poses a significant burden on their quality of life. Despite considerable advancements in treatment strategies, approximately one-third of patients are considered to have drug-resistant epilepsy. Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy frequently visit the emergency room, are hospitalized regularly, and have many seizure-related injuries. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) offers a unique treatment option by delivering precise electrical pulses with surgically implanted electrodes to the specific brain regions responsible for seizures, disrupting the seizure pathways. Long-term favorable findings showing significant seizure reduction at five-year post-implantation for patients who otherwise have no treatment options have convinced many centers to incorporate DBS into their healthcare practise.

For assessing the treatment response in epilepsy, healthcare providers are dependent on patient-reported seizure diaries. Recent research in DBS has focused on the biological implications of neuronal recordings through the implanted electrodes. These signals offer objective insight into brain activity, specifically epileptic burden, and offers potentially predictive capabilities. Current research focuses on whether the sensing capabilities of DBS can provide reliable seizure burden detection, and whether this can be achieved with less demand on the patient.

In this prospective observational cohort study, the researchers aim to improve the impact of DBS treatment on the seizure burden and quality of life of patients diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy in Atlantic Canada. This will be done by investigating the neural activity underlying epileptic events as a representation of epileptic burden, affording the opportunity to tailor DBS interventions with more precision and efficiency.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 3A7
        • Queen Elizabeth Health Science Centre
        • Contact:
          • Lutz Weise

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients qualifying for deep brain stimulation on the basis of drug-resistant epilepsy
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of consent
  • Electrical or other devices that preclude the performance of an MRI for pre-operative imaging

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Participant Group
Participants who meet eligibility criteria and provide informed consent.

Participants will be brought in for their standard follow-up appointments at 4-weeks, 4-months, and 1-year post-surgery. In addition to the routine care, physiological data will be extracted from the implanted device and analyzed. The physiological data will be considered along with the standard epilepsy diary to assess epileptic burden and inform device programming.

Quality of life will be measured with a series of standard questionnaires pre-surgery and at the 1-year follow-up.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Seizure reduction
Time Frame: Change from baseline versus Month 12
The number of seizures experienced by patients will be assessed by the number of seizures recorded by patients and their caregivers in seizure diaries and described as absolute seizure reduction.
Change from baseline versus Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in disease score on Patient Weighted Quality Of Life In Epilepsy
Time Frame: Twelve months
Assessment of therapeutic effects using Patient Weighted Quality Of Life In Epilepsy, a 10-question survey completed by patients to assess quality of life, where a higher score is associated with a more positive quality of life.
Twelve months
Change in depression score on Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy
Time Frame: Twelve months
Assessment of therapeutic effects using Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy, a 6-question survey to assess depression. A higher score is associated with more severe depression.
Twelve months
Change in anxiety score on Anxiety General Anxiety Disorder-7
Time Frame: Twelve months
Assessment of therapeutic effects using Anxiety General Anxiety Disorder-7, a 7-question survey to assess anxiety. A higher score is associated with more severe anxiety, and a lower score is associated with minimal anxiety.
Twelve months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lutz Weise, MD, PhD, Dalhousie University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy, Drug Resistant

Clinical Trials on Neuromodulation programming

Subscribe