Comparison of Subgingival Mechanotherapy With and Without the Use of a Perioscope: Clinical Trial

April 15, 2024 updated by: Medical University of Warsaw

Subgingival Mechanotherapy Using a Periodontal Endoscope Compared to Classical Subgingival Mechanotherapy for the Treatment of Periodontitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial

The study aims to comparatively assess clinical parameters, biochemical and microbiological parameters after treatment of periodontitis using subgingival mechanotherapy traditional and subgingival mechanotherapy using a perioscope.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Non-surgical treatment is the basic form of disease treatment periodontitis. Its first stage is the mechanical removal of dental plaque along with the control of risk factors. Subgingival mechanotherapy, also known as scaling and root planing (SRP) is the next stage, aimed at the subgingival area. Perioscopy makes possible direct real-time visualization of the root surface during the procedure. The research results published so far indicate improvement or no significant differences clinical parameters after SRP procedure using a perioscope vs traditional subgingival instrumentation. The aim of this study is to indicate, or not, clinical, biochemical (level of pro-inflammatory cytokines) and microbiological (A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, T. denticola) differences after periodontitis treatment using the traditional method vs. using a perioscope.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Mazowieckie
      • Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland, 02-097
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Periodontology and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 20-60; (II)
  • preserved lateral and anterior teeth;
  • no periodontal treatment in the last 12 months;
  • intermediate or advanced periodontitis (Stage II / III / IV)
  • in each quadrant at least three teeth with PPD>5 mm after initial treatment (scaling, motivation, instruction)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • antibiotic therapy in the last 6 months;
  • smoking;
  • systemic diseases affecting periodontal tissues;
  • pregnancy or lactation;
  • orthodontic treatment;
  • tooth mobility II / III degree;
  • involvement of third degree furcations according to Hamp classification;
  • endodontic issues

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Subgingival mechanotherapy with perioscopy
Scaling and root planing using ultrasonic scaler and curettes, under the control of a perioscope, enabling real-time, magnified imaging of the root surface.
Subgingival mechanotherapy using a machine scaler, curettes and a perioscope
Active Comparator: Classical subgingival mechanotherapy
Scaling and root planing using ultrasonic scaler and curettes.
Subgingival mechanotherapy using a machine scaler and curettes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Time Frame: 0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP
Distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: 0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP
Distance from the cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP
Bleeding on probing (BoP)
Time Frame: 0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP
Percentage of sites with bleeding provoked by applying a probe to the bottom of a sulcus/pocket.
0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP
Plaque index (PI)
Time Frame: 0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP
Percentage of sites with plaque
0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Width of keratinized tissue (KTW)
Time Frame: 0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP
Distance between the most apical point of gingival margin and the mucogingival junction
0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP
Gingival thickness (GT)
Time Frame: 0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP
Thickness of the gingiva measured 2 mm apical to the gingival margin
0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subgingival plaque pathogens (Aa, Pg, Td) levels
Time Frame: 0 (before) and 6 months after SRP
Levels of periodontal pathogens (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola) measured with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test; data presented as number of bacteria of these species and percentage of total bacteria found in a sample; sample taken from the deepest pocket on each side.
0 (before) and 6 months after SRP
Gingival crevicular fluid levels of cytokines
Time Frame: 0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP
Levels of (IL - interleukin) IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and interferon-gamma in gingival crevicular fluid presented as pg/ml; sample taken from the deepest pocket on each side.
0 (before), 3 and 6 months after SRP

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bartlomiej Górski, PhD, Department of Periodontology and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • WUM.Perio.05

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on subgingival mechanotherapy with perioscopy

Subscribe