FIH Clinical Investigation of Graphene Electrodes for Brain Mapping

March 20, 2026 updated by: David Coope, University of Manchester

First in Human (FIH) Clinical Investigation of Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Graphene Micro-electrocorticography Array for Brain Mapping in Neuro-oncology

The goal of this clinical investigation of a medical device is to test the safety of graphene based electrodes when used during surgery for resection of brain tumors. The main questions that it aims to answer are:

  • To understand the safety of the Graphene Cortical Interface when used during brain tumor surgery (primary objective);
  • To assess the quality of the brain signals recorded with the Graphene Cortical Interface, their ability to stimulate the brain, how stable their function is over the duration of an operation, and their suitability for use in the operating theatre (secondary objectives).

Participants will undergo tumor surgery as usual with the study electrodes being tested alongside a standard monitoring system. If they are awake for part of their surgery they may be asked to complete specific tasks such as naming objects from a list modified for the study, to evaluate the capability to decode brain signals (exploratory objective). They will be monitored subsequently for any complications including undergoing an additional MRI scan 6 weeks after their surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

During surgical operations within the brain such as the removal of a tumor, electrodes are commonly used to map specific brain functions or monitor brain activity. These are most commonly flexible plastic devices with embedded metallic contacts that allow electrical activity in the brain to be detected and measured. They may also be used to stimulate precise areas of the brain to either trigger or block a response such as the contraction of a muscle. This allows the surgeon to define which regions of the brain are involved in controlling critical functions such as movement or speech so that these areas can be protected during the operation.

There remain limitations with the design and physical characteristics of commercially available electrodes for use during brain operations. These include the limited ability of conventional materials to fold over the complex shape of the brain and the need to use comparatively large metallic contacts to detect the tiny electrical signals. This study will be the first to introduce a new generation of electrodes which have been designed to overcome these limitations. They are extremely thin and flexible allowing them to follow the surface of the brain and to be used in locations within and around the brain for which the standard electrodes are unsuitable. The contact surfaces that detect electrical activity and enable and stimulate the brain have been replaced with graphene which is a novel carbon-based material. The use of graphene allows electrodes to be made that are more sensitive to the tiny electrical signals of the brain. This means that they can be much smaller and closer together providing increased detail in the recording and potentially enabling signals to be detected that would previously have required such long recordings that they could not be used to guide decision making during surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Greater Manchester
      • Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom, M6 8HD
        • Recruiting
        • Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David J Coope, PhD FRCS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Solitary supratentorial tumor radiologically consistent with glioma (intrinsic primary brain tumor) on standard diagnostic MRI;
  • Planned for surgery under awake conditions or under general anesthesia with intra-operative electrocorticography (ECoG);
  • English as first language for those subjects with tumors associated with language areas;
  • Karnofsky performance score > 70 and World Health Organization (WHO) performance status score ≤ 1;
  • Willing and able to understand and provide informed consent for participating in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (e.g., incompatible implanted devices);
  • Previous cranial surgery or radiotherapy;
  • Subjects expected to undergo craniotomy of less than 5 cm in maximum diameter (bone to bone)
  • Known extracranial malignant neoplasm;
  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • Renal impairment sufficient to limit Gadolinium administration (EGFR <60 ml/min)
  • For those subjects with tumors associated with language areas, any contraindication which could preclude them from performing the whole awake intra operative tasks at the discretion of the Investigator (e.g., language function not suitable for monitoring tasks)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Patients with suspected gliomas (intrinsic primary brain tumors) in whom surgical resection under general anesthesia with neurophysiological monitoring or under awake conditions where language mapping is planned.
Study device to be evaluated intra-operatively alongside standard of care neurophysiological monitoring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the preliminary safety of the investigational device for its intended use
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
All adverse events (including, but not limited to, adverse device events)
Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the ability of the device to record signals from the brain
Time Frame: During surgical procedure
Performance of detecting signals from the brain by sensing of electrical brain activity
During surgical procedure
Evaluate the ability of the device to provide functional stimulation of the brain
Time Frame: During surgical procedure
Performance of functional stimulation of the brain by inducing evoked motor responses measured as peripheral muscle electromyography (EMG)
During surgical procedure
Assess stability of sensing and stimulating electrodes
Time Frame: During surgical procedure
Stability of electrodes by evaluation of impedance measurements over time
During surgical procedure
Evaluate device usability - an assessment by questionnaire of the operating surgeon's impression of the suitability of the device for sensing and stimulation during brain tumor surgery
Time Frame: During surgical procedure
Study specific questionnaire to be completed by the operating surgeon including ease of handling, positioning and removal of the electrode. The study specific 'Device Usability' tool scores outcomes on a scale of 1-4 where 4 represents a favourable feature.
During surgical procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the quality of the recorded somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) - sensing part A (exploratory)
Time Frame: During surgical procedure
Assessing the quality of recorded brain activity by measuring signal to noise ratio (SNR) during stimulation of a peripheral nerve
During surgical procedure
Assess the quality of the recorded baseline brain activity - sensing part B (exploratory)
Time Frame: During surgical procedure
Assessing the quality of recorded brain activity at rest (or under anaesthesia) evaluated as the power spectral density (PSD)
During surgical procedure
Assess the ability of detecting brain evoked responses during stimulation of the brain (exploratory)
Time Frame: During surgical procedure
Preliminary assessment of the ability of the device to detect changes in brain activity evoked in response to stimulation of distant but connected brain regions
During surgical procedure
Evaluate decoding capability from data recorded during language task (exploratory)
Time Frame: During surgical procedure
Preliminary evaluation of the ability to detect changes in brain activity that correspond to word or sound generation as the participant completes a standardized object naming task (quantified by classification accuracy)
During surgical procedure
Evaluate signal characteristics of tumour infiltrated brain regions (exploratory)
Time Frame: During surgical procedure
Preliminary evaluation of changes in the pattern of brain activity in healthy brain versus that infiltrated by tumour quantified by changes in the power spectral density (PSD)
During surgical procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David J Coope, PhD FRCS, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 24, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 24, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioma

Clinical Trials on INBRAIN Graphene Cortical Interface

Subscribe