A Study of the Cobas® Liat CT/NG/MG Test Versus Current Standard Practice for Managing Participants at Increased Risk of Sexually Transmitted Infections

June 27, 2025 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Study of the Clinical Utility of Point of Care Cobas® Liat CT/NG/MG Nucleic Acid Test Versus Current Standard Practice

This study is designed to assess the comparative clinical utility of the point of care cobas® liat CT/NG/MG to current standard practices in the diagnosis and treatment of urogenital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is designed as a block randomized, controlled 2-arm prospective study. The study targets to enroll approximatively 348 participants at increased risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs)-participants who have known contact with CT/NG/MG (including participants who report knowledge or suspicion of STI exposure, despite the uncertainty of the specific STI pathogen or contact testing results), or participants with symptoms suggestive of STI-to participate in this study. Participants who give consent will provide demographic information and urogenital specimen(s) for CT/NG/MG testing on the cobas® liat system and for external laboratory-polymerase chain reaction (EL-PCR) testing. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio in blocks (of multiples of 2) stratified by the site to either of the following arms:

  • Standard of Care (SOC)
  • Point of Care (POC)

In both arms, the clinician will see and evaluate the participant and will complete a standardized form, known as a patient management plan (PMP), at the conclusion of the participant's encounter. The critical difference between the arms is that the clinician in the POC arm will be provided POC test results upon which they may choose to base their clinical decisions, whereas the SOC arm will not receive POC test results.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

344

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94103
        • San Francisco City Clinic
    • New Jersey
      • Hamilton Square, New Jersey, United States, 08690
        • Planned Parenthood of Northern, Central, and Southern New Jersey, Inc.
      • Perth Amboy, New Jersey, United States, 08861
        • Planned Parenthood of Northern, Central and Southern New Jersey
    • Texas
      • Killeen, Texas, United States, 76543
        • Baylor Scott & White Health - Kileen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sexually active people
  • People seeking medical services for symptoms consistent with a sexually transmitted infection (STI) and/or known exposure to an STI

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously enrolled in the study
  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Currently pregnant
  • Declines POC testing
  • Presents for routine STI screening (asymptomatic)
  • Use of antimicrobial agents active against CT, NG, or MG during the 21 days before sample collection. Example of such antimicrobial agents include the following: Macrolides (e.g., azithromycin and erythromycin); Penicillins (e.g., amoxicillin); Tetracyclines (e.g., doxycycline); Fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin); Cephalosporins (e.g., ceftriaxone and cefixime)
  • Use of phenazopyridine-containing urinary pain relief medicines (ie, Azo or Pyridium) within 2 days prior to sample collection
  • Use of any over-the-counter feminine hygiene products (internally or externally), such as vaginal moisturizers, lubricants (e.g., Replens, RepHresh, etc.), and feminine washes/vaginal douches, etc. within the 3 days prior to sample collection. The use of tampons or pads during menses is not an exclusionary criterion.
  • Contraindication to vaginal swab sampling where vaginal swab sampling is the only option available
  • Urination within 1 hour prior to sample collection (for subjects providing urine sample)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Standard of Care (SOC) Arm: Standard Practice
In the SOC arm, the clinician will evaluate the participant based on standard practice.
Standard of care (SOC) is defined as the traditional/typical diagnosis and treatment steps in practice recommended by the CDC guidelines that rely upon clinical syndromic presentations and/or external laboratory testing.
Experimental: Point of Care (POC) Arm: cobas® liat CT/NG/MG
In the POC arm, the clinician will evaluate the participant and will be provided POC test results upon which they may choose to base their clinical decisions.
The cobas® CT/NG/MG nucleic acid test for use on the cobas® Liat® System is an investigational, automated, qualitative in vitro nucleic acid diagnostic test that utilizes real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) nucleic acid in male/female urine and vaginal swabs (clinician-collected and self-collected) in cobas® PCR Media.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Given Inappropriate Treatments for All Pathogens Combined (CT, NG, and MG)
Time Frame: On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
An inappropriate treatment is defined as under and/or overtreatment on the day of the medical encounter based on CDC recommendations for the pathogen-specific results obtained by EL-PCR.
On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Given Inappropriate Treatment for CT Infection
Time Frame: On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
Percentage of Participants Given Inappropriate Treatment for NG Infection
Time Frame: On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
Percentage of Participants Given Inappropriate Treatment for MG Infection
Time Frame: On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
Mean Satisfaction and Confidence Rating Scores of SOC and POC, According to Healthcare Professionals' Responses to the CSDT Questionnaire
Time Frame: Once every 2 weeks until end of study (approximately 4 months)
Healthcare professionals will rate their confidence in and their satisfaction with the POC test and SOC procedures on a 5-point scale from very confident to very unconfident and on a 5-point scale from very satisfied to very dissatisfied, respectively, in response to the Clinician Satisfaction with Diagnostic Test Questionnaire (CSDT-Q).
Once every 2 weeks until end of study (approximately 4 months)
Mean Satisfaction Rating Scores of SOC and POC, According to Participants' Responses to the PSDT Questionnaire
Time Frame: On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
Participants will rate their satisfaction with the POC test and SOC procedures on a 5-point scale from very satisfied to very dissatisfied in response to the Patient Satisfaction with Diagnostic Test Questionnaire (PSDT-Q).
On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zune Huynh, MD, Hoffmann-La Roche

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 29, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 28, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 28, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care (SOC): Clinician's Standard Practice

Subscribe