The Effect of High Reality Simulation Environment on the Skills of Midwifery Students, in Newborn Heel Blood Collection

April 16, 2024 updated by: Yonca Çiçek Okuyan, Celal Bayar University

The Effect of High Reality Simulation Environment on the Skills of Midwifery Students, Learning Satisfaction, Anxiety and Self-Efficacy in Newborn Heel Blood Collection

The researchers gave midwifery students theoretical training on how to take heel blood on a newborn model. Students were asked to take heel blood on the model in the high-reality simulation environment and simulation room. The student's ability to take heel blood before and after taking heel blood in a high-reality simulation environment or on a newborn model in a simulation environment, satisfaction with learning, anxiety and self-efficacy levels were compared.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The population of the research consisted of 4th grade midwifery students studying in the fall semester of the 2022-2023 academic year (N = 98). 6 students could not continue studying. No sample selection was made and an attempt was made to reach the entire universe. The sample of the research consisted of a total of 92 midwifery students, n=46 in the control group and n=46 in the experimental group. Verbal and written permission was obtained from the students included in the research. Both the experimental and control groups were given theoretical training on heel blood collection on a model using the show-and-tell technique.Then, those in the experimental group were asked to take heel blood on a newborn model in a high-reality simulation environment. The control group was asked to take heel blood on a newborn model in the simulation laboratory. Self-Efficacy-Efficacy scale for both the experimental group and the control group. State and Trait Anxiety Scale was applied as pre-test and post-test. Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale was applied only as a posttest. The heel prick skill evaluation form was filled out by a researcher. Pre-test and post-test results, Student tudent Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning scores , and Heel Blood Skill scores were compared between the experimental and control groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

92

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Manisa, Turkey, 45140
        • Manisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery
      • Manisa, Turkey, 45140
        • Yonca çiçek okuyan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 4th grade students (n=49) who took the Maternal and Child Health Practice course of the Midwifery Department and agreed to participate in the study voluntarily were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students in younger grades who did not take the Maternal and Child Health Practice course were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: group that practices in a high-reality simulation environment
The researcher showed the student how to take heel blood on the model. The researcher introduced both high-reality simulation environment. As a pre-test, the student was asked to fill out the Introductory Information Form, Self-Efficacy-Efficacy Scale and State and Trait Anxiety Scales surveys. Midwifery students in the experimental group were asked to take heel blood on a model in a high-reality simulation environment.Heel blood collection skill evaluation form was filled out by the researcher.As a post-test, the student was asked to fill out the Introductory Information Form, Self-Efficacy Scale and State and Trait Anxiety Scales surveys.

The person who will take heel blood in the newborn simulation model can prepare the materials.

Firstly, the blood sample can fill in all the information on the filter paper. Knows where the baby's face should be. It can determine the area where a heel blood sample can be taken.It can gently warm the heel area for a few minutes. The area can be cleaned with alcoholic preparation (cotton/swab, etc.). He can squeeze the heel with his thumb and index finger in front. The other 3 fingers can be rubbed at the back. May stroke the heel three times. The heel can be pierced once with a lancet at a suitable location. He can relax his hand. He can wipe away the first drop of blood. It can create a large thick drop of blood to be collected on filter paper. It can make the drop fill the entire ring on the filter paper with one touch. After the procedure is completed, the heel can be pressed.

No Intervention: control group
They took heel blood on a newborn model in the simulation room as routine training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skill checklist
Time Frame: during the intervention
The heel prick skill (20 tasks/step) is based on checklists for evaluating student management, recommendations of the Ministry of Health and WHO, and training materials and guides prepared by the Ministry of Health. Each task/step was evaluated as "outstanding" if performed completely and correctly, and as "needs improvement" if performed incompletely and incorrectly. Needs improvement is rated as 1 point, sufficient as 2 points. As a result of the skill checklist, the lowest score is 1 and the highest score is 40
during the intervention
State and Trait Anxiety Scales
Time Frame: one hour before and one hour after interventions
It is used to determine state and trait anxiety levels in individuals. State-Trait Anxiety Scale consists of a total of 40 items, 20 items each. The State Anxiety Scale requires the individual to describe how he or she feels at a particular moment and under certain circumstances. The total score of the scale varies between 20-80. A high score from the scale indicates a high level of anxiety, and a low score indicates a low level of anxiety.
one hour before and one hour after interventions
Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: one hour before and one hour after interventions
The scale was developed to determine behavior and behavioral changes. The scale consisting of 23 items is a 5-point Likert type self-evaluation scale. It includes the options 1-"does not describe me at all", 2-"describes me a little", 3-"undecided", 4-"describes me well", 5-"describes me very well" and the score given for each item is taken as basis. Scores between 23 and 115 are obtained from the scale. A minimum of 23 and a maximum of 115 points can be obtained from the entire scale. A high total score from the scale indicates that the individual's perception of SEM is at a good level.
one hour before and one hour after interventions
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Questionnaire
Time Frame: one month after intervention
It evaluates student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. The total number of items is 12. The scale is a 5-point Likert type and consists of the subscales "Satisfaction with Current Learning" and "Self-Confidence in Learning". The satisfaction with current learning subscale consists of 5 items, the self-confidence in learning subscale consists of 7 items, and there are no negative items. The sum of the subdimensions of the scale does not give the total score. Scale scores; It is obtained by dividing the sum of the sub-dimensions by the number of items. As the total score from the scale increases, student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning also increases.
one month after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yonca çiçek okuyan, PhD, Manisa Celal Bayar University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MCBU-SBF-YC-04

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Heel blood collection in a newborn simulation model

Subscribe