1 vs 7 RATG Infusions in Renal Transplantation (ONSET)

Basiliximab With One Day or Seven Days RATG Induction Therapy in Renal Transplantation: a Matched-cohort Observational Study

This trial is to compare the risk/benefit profile over six-month follow-up of two induction immunosuppressive regimens based on one or seven low-dose perioperative RATG infusions on top of the same induction therapy with basiliximab and steroid (progressively tapered post-transplant) and maintenance therapy with calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid in 75 recipients (25 Patients and 50 Reference-Patients) of a single or dual first kidney transplant from an ideal or marginal donor at a single Renal Transplant Center.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In patients receiving a kidney transplant, it is necessary to use immunosuppressive drugs that serve to reduce or prevent the risk of rejection. Some of these drugs are infused only in the first days of the transplant to more effectively reduce the reactivity of the immune system when the risk of rejection is highest. Among these are thymoglobulins, antibodies that destroy immune system cells (lymphocytes) which can cause rejection. For this reason, in their Center the investigators have developed a protocol that provides for the infusion of thymoglobulins for seven consecutive days starting from the day of the transplant. The first infusion begins even before the transplant is performed so that the lymphocytes are destroyed before the kidney is implanted and can therefore be recognized by the immune system as a foreign organ. This first administration is therefore certainly the most important, to the point that perhaps subsequent infusions of thymoglobulins may not even be necessary. Based on this reasoning, starting from April 1st 2023 the investigators began to infuse only the first dose of thymoglobulins, always starting the infusion before the transplant was performed, avoiding subsequent administrations. The goal was to maintain the same anti-rejection efficacy, but reducing the risk of side effects. In fact, thymoglobulins reduce the number of white blood cells and platelets in the blood and can increase the risk of opportunistic infections which are facilitated by the fact that the activity of the immune system is reduced by thymoglobulins. In other words, the effects of thymoglobulins on the immune system that serve to reduce the risk of rejection are the same as those that increase the risk of infections.

At this point the investigators would therefore like to verify whether actually infusing a single dose of thymoglobulin starting before the transplant can maintain the same anti-rejection effect that is obtained by administering seven doses of thymoglobulin, while reducing the risk of side effects. For this reason, in this study they want to compare the data already collected for clinical reasons in kidney transplant recipients treated with a single dose of thymoglobulin with the data, also already collected, in kidney transplant recipients who instead received all seven doses of thymoglobulin. The latter must have the same characteristics as patients who have received a single dose of thymoglobulins. In essence the investigators should compare two groups of patients who are very similar in terms of the type of transplant performed (for example single or double) and the other anti-rejection therapies administered in addition to thymoglobulins and who differ only in having received one or seven infusions. All patients will have received the transplant from the same surgical team and will have been monitored and treated by the same nephrology team based on the same standardized clinical monitoring and immunosuppressive treatment protocols (regardless of the number of thymoglobulin doses). In this way, any differences in the risk of rejection or side effects that may emerge between the two groups could only be explained by the difference in treatment with thymoglobulins (with a single dose or with seven doses).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • BG
      • Bergamo, BG, Italy, 24127
        • ASST HPG23 - Unità di Nefrologia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive recipients of a single or dual kidney transplant from ideal or marginal donors at the Renal Transplant Center of the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) of the Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, in Bergamo (Italy)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consecutive recipients of a single or dual kidney transplant from ideal or marginal donors who, from 01/04/2023 to 31/12/2023, were induced with one single perioperative RATG infusion
  • Consecutive recipients (Reference-Patients) of a single or dual kidney transplant from ideal or marginal donors who before 01/04/2023 were induced with seven perioperative RATG infusions (on top of the same induction and maintenance treatment used for patients receiving one single RATG infusion)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Living donor recipients, second transplant recipients or patients receiving a multiorgan transplant, and patients with a peak panel reactive antibody titer >30% or positive B cell cross-match

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients
25 consecutive recipients of a single or dual kidney transplant from ideal or marginal donors who, from 01/04/2023 to 31/12/2023, were induced with one single perioperative RATG infusion (Patients) at the Renal Transplant Center of the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) of the Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, in Bergamo (Italy)
Thymoglobulin, Genzyme corporation, Italy.
Other Names:
  • Thymoglobulin
Simulect, Novartis, Italy.
Other Names:
  • Simulect
Reference patients
The most recent 50 consecutive recipients (Reference-Patients) of a single or dual kidney transplant from ideal or marginal donors who before 01/04/2023 were induced with seven perioperative RATG infusions (on top of the same induction and maintenance treatment used for patients receiving one single RATG infusion) at the Renal Transplant Center of the (ASST) of the Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, in Bergamo (Italy)
Thymoglobulin, Genzyme corporation, Italy.
Other Names:
  • Thymoglobulin
Simulect, Novartis, Italy.
Other Names:
  • Simulect

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of thrombocytopenia and/or leukopenia
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Incidence of thrombocytopenia and/or leukopenia requiring or not requiring down-titration or transient withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil/ mycophenolic acid (and/or RATG)
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of anemia
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Occurrence of anemia requiring treatment with erythropoiesis stimulating agents
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Occurrence of viral infections
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Polyomavirus BK (BKV) and/or Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/reactivations
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Occurrence of pneumonia
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Occurrence of opportunistic infections
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Systemic candidiasis and any other opportunistic infection
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Occurrence of delayed graft function
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Delayed Graft Function defined as need of dialysis during the first week post-transplant
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Occurrence of allograft rejection
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Acute allograft rejection (overall, steroid-resistant and biopsy-proven rejections considered separately)
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Occurrence of biopsy proven rejection
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Banff score for biopsy proven rejections
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Survival
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Six-month patient/graft survival
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Platelet and WBC counts
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Six-month time course of platelet and WBC counts
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Creatinine levels
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Six-month time course of serum creatinine levels
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months
Incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events
From day 0 post-transplant up to 10 days or patient discharge, then at 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-transplant and every 1 month up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Giuseppe Remuzzi, MD, Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Replacement

Clinical Trials on RATG

Subscribe