Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Congenital and Juvenile Form: From Diagnosis to Rehabilitation [MDCJ-NeuBeRe] (MDCJ-NeuBeRe)

April 19, 2024 updated by: IRCCS Eugenio Medea

Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Congenital and Juvenile Form: From Diagnosis to Rehabilitation

The rationale of the study is to collect structured data in the neuropsychological, clinical neuroradiologic and neurorehabilitation fields in children/young people affected by congenital and juvenile myotonic dystrophy. Children affected by the congenital form (CDM1) present important brain alterations present since birth while, on the contrary, patients with the adult form of DM1 often present a degenerative, slowly progressive neurocognitive picture. Promising therapies that aim to correct the molecular mechanism underlying the symptoms of adult forms of DM1 are under development, but their potential role at the level of the nervous system and in particular in forms of CDM1 (which appears to be a distinct disorder of neuronal development) is also to be clarified.

To this end, a better definition of neurocognitive profiles and their evolution is essential for the purposes of evaluating the effectiveness of experimental therapies.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

A. Recruitment of patients with a defined diagnosis of Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 (see following inclusion and exclusion criteria)

B) Clinical and cognitive evaluation

  1. neurological and neuromuscular examination, compilation of the MIRS-muscle scale and EPWORTH scale-daytime sleepiness (1 session of approximately 1 hour);
  2. administration of a neuropsychological battery, in order to define the level of cognitive functioning and to frame a detailed function-specific profile (multiple sessions to be defined based on the collaboration of the patients) investigating the following areas:

    1. intelligence quotient;
    2. attention;
    3. memory;
    4. visual-constructive skills and executive functions
  3. psychiatric examination and administration of psychological tests (MMPI-2, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2) to investigate any psychopathologies (behavioral disorders, anxiety disorders, developmental disorders, hyperactivity/attention deficit) and to define the psychological-behavioral profile and adaptive (Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scale)
  4. neuroimaging examination through Morphological magnetic resonance and Diffusor Tensor imaging and Voxel Based Morphometry protocols
  5. based on the clinical conditions, a cardiological evaluation will also be carried out (including instrumental tests such as Electrocardiogram ECG, echocardiogram and 24-hour ECG) and pneumological evaluation (with recording of nocturnal oximetry, spirometry), eye examination, phoniatric examination and logopedic evaluation (aimed at evaluating chewing/swallowing)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with a defined diagnosis of MYotonic Dystrophy type 1, congenital and juvenile form

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. genetically defined diagnosis of Steinert myotonic dystrophy
  2. age <35 years
  3. reading and signing the informed consent. For the congenital form: presence of hypotonia and weakness at birth, for the juvenile form: onset between 1 and 10 years with normal pre-perinatal history.

Exclusion criteria

  1. other concomitant pathologies that completely prevent the execution of clinical assessments
  2. presence of devices and prostheses that prevent the execution of the MRI
  3. lack of family compliance. -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Myotonic Dystrophy type 1
Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 -congenital form Myotonic Dystrophy type 1-infantile form
clinical and neurocognitive evaluations neuroradiological evaluation through cerebral magnetic resonance
Other Names:
  • cerebral imaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor function evaluation by Muscular Impairment Rating Scale
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 2 years
Muscular Impairment Rating Scale (MIRS) in assessing patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). The MIRS is a ordinal five-point rating scale, where grade 1 = no clinical muscular impairment; grade 2 = early muscular impairment (clinical myotonia, facial weakness, and weakness of neck flexors) without limb weakness; grade 3 = distal weakness; grade 4 = mild to moderate (3 ≤ core < 5) proximal weakness; grade 5 = severe (MRC score<3)proximal weakness proximal weakness
through study completion,an average of 2 years
cognitive evaluation by Wechsler Intelligence scale
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 2 years
Wechsler Intelligence scale: mean score 100 SD 15 (SD: Standard Deviation):deficiency when 2 Standard Deviation below average)
through study completion,an average of 2 years
cognitive evaluation by Raven Matrices
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 2 years
Raven Matrices , Z scores=/> 0,00 (in range); Z scores =/< -2,00 (deficiency)
through study completion,an average of 2 years
cognitive evaluation by Continous Performance Test 3
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 2 years
Continous Performance Test 3: T mean Scores 50 SD 10 (SD: standard deviation) (T=45-59 in range; T =/>60 below range)
through study completion,an average of 2 years
cognitive evaluation by Trail Making Test A-B
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 2 years
Trail Making Test A-B: Z scores=/> 0,00 (in range); Z scores =/< -2,00 (deficiency)
through study completion,an average of 2 years
cognitive evaluation by Digit Span and CORSI Test
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 2 years
Digit Span and CORSI Test:Z scores=/> 0,00 (in range); Z scores =/< -2,00 (deficiency)
through study completion,an average of 2 years
cognitive evaluation by Rey Figure test
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 2 years
Rey Figure test: Z scores=/> 0,00 (in range); Z scores =/< -2,00 (deficiency):
through study completion,an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical evaluation by Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 2 years
Epworth Sleepiness Scale: scores from 0 to 24; above 10, clinical risk.
through study completion,an average of 2 years
cognitive evaluation by Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 2 years
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: mean score 100 SD 15 (SD: standard deviation) : deficiency when 2 Standard Deviation below average
through study completion,an average of 2 years
cognitive evaluation by Tower of London test
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 2 years
Tower of London:mean score 100 SD 15 deficiency when 2 Standard Deviation below average)
through study completion,an average of 2 years
cognitive and behavioral evaluation by Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 2 years
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- MMPI 2: mean score 50 SD 10 ((SD: standard deviation)
through study completion,an average of 2 years
cognitive and behavioral evaluation by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales
Time Frame: through study completion :an average of 2 years
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales mean score 100 SD 15 (SD: standard deviation) :deficiency when 2 Standard Deviation below average
through study completion :an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myotonic Dystrophy 1

Clinical Trials on neurocognitive evaluations

Subscribe