Parental Perceptions and Acceptance of Silver Diamine Fluoride in Spain and Italy (SDF)

April 21, 2024 updated by: Simone Bagattoni, University of Bologna

Comparison of Aesthetic Perception and Acceptability of Silver Diamine Fluoride Staining Between Spanish and Italian Parents.

Assessing parental aesthetic acceptability of Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) staining is crucial for its potential implementation in paediatric dentistry. This study represents the third part of a wider project initially focused on evaluating SDF aesthetic acceptability in Italy, then comparing it between Spanish and Italian parents

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the present study was to compare aesthetic perceptions and acceptance of SDF pigmentation between Spanish and Italian parents, and assess weather acceptability is influenced by location, child's cooperation, or demographic background. A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted among 267 Spanish parents and 234 Italian parents whose children were attending three university dental clinics. A validated Italian version of the questionnaire "Parental perceptions of Silver Diamine Fluoride Dental Color Changes" was implemented. The questionnaire included sets of colored photographs showing both anterior and posterior teeth before and after SD treatment. Respondents were requested to provide their assessments based on the presented visual stimuli.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

501

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40125
        • Servizio di Assistenza Odontoiatrica per disabili in età evolutiva e di odontoiatria infantile

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Parents awaiting their child's dental appointments at three distinct locations: for Italian parents the Unit of Dental Care for Special Needs Patients and Paediatric Dentistry at the University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, and the Unit of Paediatric Dentistry at the University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy - for Spanish parents the Department of Paediatric Dentistry of the International University of Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Spanish and Italian parents, for each group respectively
  • Parents of healthy children or children with mild systemic disease. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status 1-2
  • Parents of children under the age of 12 years
  • Parents of children with previous caries experience in primary teeth
  • Parents who consented to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No Spanish and Italian parents, for each group respectively
  • Parents of children with ASA status ≥ 3
  • Parents of children over the age of 12 years
  • Parents of children without previous caries experience in primary teeth
  • Parents who no consented to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Spanish parents
Spanish parents were recruited at the Department of Paediatric Dentistry of UIC between March 2023 and July 2023, accomplishing the second phase of the survey.
Italian parents
Italian parents were recruited at the Unit of Dental Care for Special Needs Patients and Paediatric Dentistry at the University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, and the Unit of Paediatric Dentistry at the University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy between September 2020 and March 2022

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of SDF's overall acceptance between Spanish and Italian parents
Time Frame: Baseline
Measurement tool: questionnaire. Specific questions focused on the general acceptability of the SDF staining for anterior and posterior teeth. Scores for levels of acceptability were 'unacceptable' (scoring 1), 'somewhat unacceptable' (scoring 2), 'somewhat acceptable' (scoring 3), and 'acceptable' (scoring 4). Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of SDF's specific acceptability in different scenarios of child's behavior between Spain and Italy
Time Frame: Baseline
Measurement tool: questionnaire. Acceptance of SD treatment was evaluated by asking parents if they would allow the treatment to be done on their children in a context of hypothetical scenarios of child cooperation (child cooperative; child upset but could cooperate; child crying; child needs physical restraint; child screaming or kicking; child needs nitrous oxide sedation; child needs oral sedation; child needs general anesthesia). This assessment was carried out separately for anterior and posterior teeth. Scores for acceptance level were 'extremely unlikely' (scoring 1), 'somewhat unlikely' (scoring 2), 'somewhat likely' (scoring 3), and 'very likely' (scoring 4). Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Baseline
Parental overall acceptability of SD staining according to demographic background
Time Frame: Baseline
Measurement tool: questionnaire. Specific questions were strategically formulated to capture a comprehensive range of demographic variables of the participants, including factors such as age, education, and socioeconomic status. The findings from this analysis contribute valuable insights into the nuanced relationship between demographic characteristics and parental attitudes towards SD staining in Spain and Italy.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acceptability

Subscribe