- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06384326
Parental Perceptions and Acceptance of Silver Diamine Fluoride in Spain and Italy (SDF)
April 21, 2024 updated by: Simone Bagattoni, University of Bologna
Comparison of Aesthetic Perception and Acceptability of Silver Diamine Fluoride Staining Between Spanish and Italian Parents.
Assessing parental aesthetic acceptability of Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) staining is crucial for its potential implementation in paediatric dentistry.
This study represents the third part of a wider project initially focused on evaluating SDF aesthetic acceptability in Italy, then comparing it between Spanish and Italian parents
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
The aim of the present study was to compare aesthetic perceptions and acceptance of SDF pigmentation between Spanish and Italian parents, and assess weather acceptability is influenced by location, child's cooperation, or demographic background.
A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted among 267 Spanish parents and 234 Italian parents whose children were attending three university dental clinics.
A validated Italian version of the questionnaire "Parental perceptions of Silver Diamine Fluoride Dental Color Changes" was implemented.
The questionnaire included sets of colored photographs showing both anterior and posterior teeth before and after SD treatment.
Respondents were requested to provide their assessments based on the presented visual stimuli.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
501
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bologna, Italy, 40125
- Servizio di Assistenza Odontoiatrica per disabili in età evolutiva e di odontoiatria infantile
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Parents awaiting their child's dental appointments at three distinct locations: for Italian parents the Unit of Dental Care for Special Needs Patients and Paediatric Dentistry at the University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, and the Unit of Paediatric Dentistry at the University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy - for Spanish parents the Department of Paediatric Dentistry of the International University of Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Spanish and Italian parents, for each group respectively
- Parents of healthy children or children with mild systemic disease. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status 1-2
- Parents of children under the age of 12 years
- Parents of children with previous caries experience in primary teeth
- Parents who consented to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- No Spanish and Italian parents, for each group respectively
- Parents of children with ASA status ≥ 3
- Parents of children over the age of 12 years
- Parents of children without previous caries experience in primary teeth
- Parents who no consented to participate
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Spanish parents
Spanish parents were recruited at the Department of Paediatric Dentistry of UIC between March 2023 and July 2023, accomplishing the second phase of the survey.
|
|
Italian parents
Italian parents were recruited at the Unit of Dental Care for Special Needs Patients and Paediatric Dentistry at the University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, and the Unit of Paediatric Dentistry at the University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy between September 2020 and March 2022
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of SDF's overall acceptance between Spanish and Italian parents
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Measurement tool: questionnaire.
Specific questions focused on the general acceptability of the SDF staining for anterior and posterior teeth.
Scores for levels of acceptability were 'unacceptable' (scoring 1), 'somewhat unacceptable' (scoring 2), 'somewhat acceptable' (scoring 3), and 'acceptable' (scoring 4).
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of SDF's specific acceptability in different scenarios of child's behavior between Spain and Italy
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Measurement tool: questionnaire.
Acceptance of SD treatment was evaluated by asking parents if they would allow the treatment to be done on their children in a context of hypothetical scenarios of child cooperation (child cooperative; child upset but could cooperate; child crying; child needs physical restraint; child screaming or kicking; child needs nitrous oxide sedation; child needs oral sedation; child needs general anesthesia).
This assessment was carried out separately for anterior and posterior teeth.
Scores for acceptance level were 'extremely unlikely' (scoring 1), 'somewhat unlikely' (scoring 2), 'somewhat likely' (scoring 3), and 'very likely' (scoring 4).
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
Baseline
|
|
Parental overall acceptability of SD staining according to demographic background
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Measurement tool: questionnaire.
Specific questions were strategically formulated to capture a comprehensive range of demographic variables of the participants, including factors such as age, education, and socioeconomic status.
The findings from this analysis contribute valuable insights into the nuanced relationship between demographic characteristics and parental attitudes towards SD staining in Spain and Italy.
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 21, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
April 25, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 25, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 21, 2024
Last Verified
April 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- bagattoni3
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acceptability
-
RTI InternationalCompletedAcceptabilitySouth Africa
-
University of PittsburghUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID); Oak Crest Institute...TerminatedSafety | AcceptabilityUnited States, South Africa, Zimbabwe
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...CompletedHPV Vaccine AcceptabilityFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier de CayenneCompleted
-
Arizona State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingFeasibility Studies | AcceptabilityUnited States
-
Rohan, Lisa, PhDUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID)CompletedSafety | Usability | AcceptabilityUnited States, Kenya, South Africa, Zimbabwe
-
University of LiverpoolLiverpool John Moores University; Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation TrustCompletedTolerance | Acceptability | Human FactorsUnited Kingdom
-
Beni-Suef UniversityCompletedAcceptability of Health CareEgypt
-
University of California, BerkeleyUniversity of California, DavisCompletedConsumption | Side Effect | AcceptabilityUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingAcceptability, Preferences, and Needs